Synlett 2024; 35(17): 2042-2048
DOI: 10.1055/a-2284-4984
letter
Special Section 14th EuCheMS Organic Division Young Investigator Workshop

Synthesis of Three-Dimensional Benzophenone Analogues Based on a [2.2]Paracyclophane Scaffold

Shiqi Wu
,
Laurent Micouin
,
Erica Benedetti
The authors gratefully thank the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (JCJC projet PhotoChiraPhane) (ANR-19-CE07-0001-01), the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris Cité (ANR-18-IDEX-0001), and the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche for financial support. The Chinese Scholarship Council is acknowledged for a grant to S.W.


Abstract

Herein, we report the synthesis of functionalized three-dimensional benzophenone analogues derived from [2.2]paracyclophane (pCp). The potential use of these compounds as photocatalysts is disclosed. Benzophenone and its derivatives are well-known photoactive compounds that have been extensively employed over the years as catalysts to promote a variety of transformations activated by light. The development of differently substituted three-dimensional versions of such compounds may significantly expand the range of their applications in photocatalysis. Exploitation of the planar chirality of substituted paracyclophanes may also lead to significant innovations in different fields. [2.2]Paracyclophane-based benzophenone derivatives incorporating reactive ester or amide functions at their pseudo-gem position are successfully prepared in a selective manner. Examples of both racemic and enantiopure compounds are reported. As a proof of concept, the catalytic activities of the newly synthesized molecules are compared to that of benzophenone in a known photooxidation reaction.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 16 February 2024

Accepted after revision: 10 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
10 March 2024

Article published online:
26 March 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Brown CJ, Farthing AC. Nature 1949; 164: 915
  • 2 Hope H, Bernstein J, Trueblood KN. Acta Cryst. 1972; B28: 1733
  • 3 Cram DJ, Allinger NL, Steinberg H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954; 76: 6132
  • 7 Hassan Z, Spuling E, Knoll DM, Bräse S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 2156
  • 10 Felder S, Wu S, Brom J, Micouin L, Benedetti E. Chirality 2021; 33: 506
  • 12 Amos SG. E, Garreau M, Buzzetti L, Waser J. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020; 16: 1163
  • 13 Hopf H, Laue T, Zander M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991; 30: 432
  • 16 Spuling E, Sharma N, Samuel ID. W, Zysman-Colman E, Bräse S. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 9278
  • 17 Wan Y, Alterman M, Larhed M, Hallberg A. J. Comb. Chem. 2003; 5: 82
  • 18 Rozenberg VI, Antonov DYu, Sergeeva EV, Vorontsov EV, Starikova ZA, Fedyanin IV, Schulz C, Hopf H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 2056
  • 20 Nikitas NF, Tzaras DI, Triandafillidi I, Kokotos CG. Green Chem. 2020; 22: 471
  • 21 Brom J, Maruani A, Turcaud S, Lajnef S, Peyrot F, Micouin L, Benedetti E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024; 22: 59
  • 22 Wu S, Galan LA, Roux M, Riobe F, Le Guennic B, Guyot Y, Le Bahers T, Micouin L, Maury O, Benedetti E. Inorg. Chem. 2021; 60: 16194
  • 23 Compound (±)-1 In a 50 mL flask, [2.2]paracyclophane (1 equiv., 2 g, 9.6 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and cooled to –10 °C. A solution of benzoyl chloride (2 equiv., 2.7 g, 2.2 mL, 19.2 mmol) and AlCl3 (1.75 equiv., 2.24 g, 0.92 mL, 16.8 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added and the reaction was stirred at –10 °C for 1 h. The mixture was then filtered and hydrolyzed with ice. The resulting aqueous solution was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with aqueous NaHCO3 solution and brine, then dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (Cy/EtOAc = 30:1) to yield (±)-1 (2.4 g, 7.68 mmol, 80%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.72–7.68 (m, 2 H), 7.54 (td, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.75 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.72–6.68 (m, 2 H), 6.57 (t, J = 1.1 Hz, 2 H), 6.56 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.35 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.37–3.31 (m, 1 H), 3.28–3.22 (m, 1 H), 3.21–3.05 (m, 3 H), 3.04–2.92 (m, 2 H), 2.86 (ddd, J = 12.8, 10.4, 5.4 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.6 (C), 141.6 (C), 139.9 (C), 139.3 (C), 139.3 (C), 138.9 (C), 136.3 (C), 136.0 (CH), 135.7 (CH), 134.3 (CH), 132.7 (CH), 132.7 (CH), 132.4 (CH), 132.4 (CH), 131.1 (CH), 129.9 (2 CH), 128.2 (2 CH), 35.6 (CH2), 35.3 (CH2), 35.2 (CH2), 35.1 (CH2). The spectroscopic data are consistent with the literature data for this compound (see Ref. 13).
  • 24 Compound (±)-5 Anhydrous AlCl3 (1.9 equiv., 1.21 g, 9.09 mmol) was suspended in dry CH2Cl2 (50 mL) in a 100 mL round-bottomed flask. The mixture was cooled to –10 °C, and (COCl)2 (1.9 equiv., 1.18 g, 0.80 mL, 9.11 mmol) was added dropwise (pale yellow solution). The resulting suspension was stirred at –10 °C for 5 min, then [2.2]paracyclophane (1 equiv., 1 g, 4.8 mmol) was slowly added portionwise, turning the solution dark red. The reaction mixture was stirred at –10 °C for 30 min. About 50 g of ice was then added, turning the mixture yellow. The two immiscible layers were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with cold CH2Cl2 (–20 °C, 3 × 50 mL). The combined organic phases were kept at –20 °C, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure in a cold bath. The resulting yellow solid (1 equiv., 1.43 g, 4.8 mmol) was suspended in dry chlorobenzene (40 mL). The solution was heated at reflux and stirred for 3 d. The mixture was then concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting brown solid (1 equiv., 1.3 g, 4.8 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of methanol (20 mL) and CH2Cl2 (6 mL). The solution was heated at reflux and stirred for 3 d. The mixture was then concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (Cy/EtOAc = 30:1) to afford (±)-5 (823 mg, 3.09 mmol, 64%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.14 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.66 (dd, J = 7.7, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.59–6.53 (m, 2 H), 6.52–6.43 (m, 3 H), 4.10 (ddd, J = 12.9, 9.8, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.92 (s, 3 H), 3.26–2.94 (m, 6 H), 2.87 (ddd, J = 12.9, 10.1, 6.9 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 167.5 (C), 142.6 (C), 139.9 (C), 139.8 (C), 139.3 (C), 136.4 (CH), 136.1 (CH), 135.3 (CH), 133.1 (CH), 132.7 (CH), 132.2 (CH), 131.5 (CH), 130.7 (C), 51.7 (CH3), 36.1 (CH2), 35.2 (CH2), 35.1 (CH2), 34.9 (CH2). The synthesis of this compound was replicated several times. The spectroscopic data are consistent with the literature data for this compound (see Ref. 15).
  • 25 Compound (±)-6 A solution of (±)-5 (1 equiv., 1 g, 3.75 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was cooled to –10 °C. TiCl4 (1 M solution in CH2Cl2, 3.5 equiv., 26 mL, 13.1 mmol) was added portionwise, followed by 1,1-dichlorodimethyl ether (3.5 equiv., 1.51 g, 1.19 mL, 13.1 mmol). The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred under argon for 16 h. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of ice. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution, water, and brine, then dried over MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (Cy/EtOAc = 20:1) to afford (±)-6 (0.68 g, 2.31 mmol, 62%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.91 (s, 1 H), 7.07 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.72–6.67 (m, 2 H), 6.65–6.60 (m, 2 H), 4.29–4.05 (m, 2 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.21–3.05 (m, 5 H), 3.05–2.93 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 190.6 (CH), 167.0 (C), 143.5 (C), 142.1 (C), 140.1 (C), 139.7 (C), 138.2 (CH), 136.6 (C), 136.2 (CH), 136.0 (CH), 135.7 (CH), 134.5 (CH), 133.8 (CH), 130.8 (C), 51.9 (CH3), 35.0 (CH2), 34.8 (CH2), 34.6 (CH2), 31.2 (CH2). The spectroscopic data are consistent with the literature data for this compound (see Ref. 18).
  • 26 Grignard Reaction for the Synthesis of Intermediate (±)-7a; Representative Procedure A Compound (±)-6 (1 equiv., 500 mg, 1.7 mmol) was dissolved in dry THF (10 mL) under an argon atmosphere. PhMgBr (1.2 equiv., 1 M in THF, 2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol) was added dropwise, and the resulting solution was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution. THF was removed under vacuum, and the resulting mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (Cy/EtOAc = 25:1) to yield product (±)-7a (520 mg, 1.4 mmol, 82%) as a white solid. IR (neat): 3498, 2949, 1711, 1594, 1492, 1436, 1274, 1199, 1096, 1077, 1033, 919, 872, 793, 764, 730 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.21–7.16 (m, 4 H), 7.15–7.08 (m, 3 H), 6.98 (s, 1 H), 6.72 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.62 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.50 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.46 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.65 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.05 (ddd, J = 13.7, 10.0, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.98 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H), 3.39 (dd, J = 3.8, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.32 (ddd, J = 13.8, 9.9, 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.21–3.03 (m, 4 H), 2.89 (ddd, J = 13.8, 10.5, 3.7 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 169.6 (C), 143.5 (C), 143.3 (C), 141.8 (C), 139.9 (C), 139.8 (C), 137.1 (CH), 136.1 (CH), 135.4 (C), 134.9 (CH), 134.4 (CH), 131.9 (CH), 129.3 (C), 128.3 (2 CH), 127.7 (CH), 127.2 (CH), 127.0 (2 CH), 72.6 (CH), 52.4 (CH3), 35.0 (CH2), 34.9 (CH2), 34.1 (CH2), 32.3 (CH2). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C25H24O3Na: 395.1618; found: 395.1618.
  • 27 Oxidation Reaction for the Synthesis of Compound (±)-3a; Representative Procedure B In a round-bottomed flask under an argon atmosphere, compound (±)-7a (1 equiv., 420 mg, 1.13 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (9 mL). Dess–Martin periodinane (DMP, 1.25 equiv., 599 mg, 1.41 mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture. The resulting solution was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction was quenched by the addition of saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The immiscible phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (×2). The combined organic phases were washed with water and brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (Cy/EtOAc = 35:1) to yield product (±)-3a (386 mg, 1.04 mmol, 92%) as a white solid. IR (neat): 1716, 1657, 1596, 1556, 1435, 1275, 1196, 1076, 953, 861, 800, 764, 750, 720 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.67–7.64 (m, 2 H), 7.53–7.49 (m, 1 H), 7.42–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.19 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.89 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.72 (ddd, J = 7.8, 5.6, 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.61 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.14 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.96 (s, 3 H), 3.33–3.23 (m, 1 H), 3.19–3.05 (m, 4 H), 2.94–2.86 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.0 (C), 167.2 (C), 142.5 (C), 141.9 (C), 139.5 (C), 139.3 (C), 139.2 (C), 137.0 (C), 136.2 (CH), 136.1 (CH), 135.9 (CH), 135.1 (CH), 134.5 (CH), 133.6 (CH), 132.1 (CH), 129.8 (2 CH), 129.6 (C), 128.1 (2 CH), 51.9 (CH3), 35.7 (CH2), 34.8 (CH2), 34.8 (CH2), 34.7 (CH2). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C25H23O3: 371.1642; found: 371.1641.
  • 28 Synthesis of Primary Amide (±)-4a; Representative Procedure C To a solution of compound (±)-3a (1 equiv., 200 mg, 0.54 mmol) in EtOH (5.5 mL) was added a solution of KOH (10 equiv., 2 M in H2O, 2.7 mL, 5.4 mmol). The resulting mixture was heated at reflux and stirred for 5 h. The reaction was then cooled to room temperature and acidified to pH 5 with an aqueous HCl solution (2 M). The resulting mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford the carboxylic acid (±)-8a (190 mg, 0.533 mmol, 99%) as a white solid. To a suspension of this compound (1 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 (5.5 mL), oxalyl chloride (1.2 equiv., 81 mg, 55 μL, 0.64 mmol) was added, followed by a few drops of DMF (10 mol%, 5 μL, 0.05 mmol). The solution was stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure to afford the desired acyl chloride derivative (198 mg, 0.528 mmol, quant.) as a yellow solid. This product (1 equiv.) was dissolved in dry acetone (4.5 mL). NH4OH (32 equiv., 2.4 mL, 16.9 mmol) was added at 5 °C, and the solution was stirred for 1 h. Water was then added, and the acetone was evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting aqueous solution was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous Na2CO3 solution and water, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (Cy/EtOAc = 2:1) to afford (±)-4a (160 mg, 0.45 mmol, 85%) as a white solid. IR (neat): 3005, 1657, 1596, 1555, 1447, 1371, 1322, 1276, 1075, 839, 802, 742, 720 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.66 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 6.86 (s, 1 H), 6.77 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.69 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.63 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.62 (s, 2 H), 4.01–3.83 (m, 1 H), 3.37–3.25 (m, 1 H), 3.23–2.98 (m, 4 H), 2.97–2.86 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.1 (C), 170.3 (C), 142.2 (C), 139.9 (C), 139.7 (C), 139.5 (C), 139.1 (C), 136.4 (C), 136.3 (CH), 136.1 (CH), 135.2 (CH), 135.2 (CH), 134.1 (CH), 133.2 (C), 132.0 (CH), 131.7 (CH), 129.9 (2 CH), 128.1 (2 CH), 36.0 (CH2), 35.2 (CH2), 34.8 (CH2), 34.7 (CH2). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C24H22O2N: 356.1645; found: 356.1644.
  • 29 Photooxidation of Benzylic Alcohol in the Presence of Catalyst (±)-1; Representative Procedure D In a glass vial, (±)-1 (0.2 equiv., 14 mg, 0.046 mmol) was dissolved in DMSO-d 6 (0.6 mL). Benzyl alcohol (9) (1 equiv., 22 mg, 21 μL, 0.2 mmol) was added to the mixture. The vial was then placed in a Rayonet photoreactor, and the reaction was irradiated at 300–350 nm under air for 55 h (Temp = 29 °C). Water (10 mL) and CH2Cl2 (10 mL) were then added. The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The conversion (unreacted starting material vs desired product) was determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.