CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(05): E642-E648
DOI: 10.1055/a-2290-0263
Original article

Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) interventions to improve real-world endoscopy unit productivity

Christopher Bradley
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12223)
,
Matt Sumethasorn
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12223)
,
Jin Sun Kim
2   Division of Gastrointestinal Liver Disease, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5116)
,
Sarah Wang
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12223)
,
Leslie Martinez
3   Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5141)
,
Megan Chang
3   Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5141)
,
Lillian Lemus
3   Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5141)
,
Behrod Katebian
3   Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5141)
,
Dara Bruce
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12223)
,
Andy Lee
3   Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5141)
,
Rachel Baden
3   Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5141)
,
Hal Yee
3   Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5141)
,
James Buxbaum
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12223)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims The Plan-Do-Study Act (PDSA) ramp is a framework that uses initial small changes to build consensus and momentum for subsequent, iterative process improvement. Our aim was to study its impact on endoscopy unit efficiency and throughput.

Methods Following a granular time-and-motion analysis to evaluate baseline performance (phase 1) we instituted successive interventions and measured their impact on core efficiency metrics including procedure volume and turnover time (phases 2–3).

Results We identified that inefficiency in turnover of anesthesia-supported endoscopy was the most crucial issue. Implementation of a pre-procedure anesthesia visit in phase 2 reduced turnover time by 15.5 minutes (95% confidence interval 3.9–27.1 minutes). Subsequent changes (phase 3) including front-loaded procedure scheduling and parallel in-room preparation resulted in an 18% increase in procedure volume.

Conclusions The PDSA ramp model is an effective means of assessing operational processes, developing novel interventions, and building consensus to improve the real-world productivity in a resource-conscious manner.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 30 October 2023

Accepted after revision: 06 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 March 2024

Article published online:
03 May 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Lin MY, Mishra G, Ellison J. et al. Differences in patient outcomes after outpatient GI endoscopy across settings: a statewide matched cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1088-1097 e17
  • 2 Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC. et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: Update 2021. Gastroenterology 2022; 162: 621-644
  • 3 Meyer GS, Jacoby I, Krakauer H. et al. Gastroenterology workforce modeling. JAMA 1996; 276: 689-694
  • 4 Buxbaum JL, Bradley CP, Lee WA. et al. Addressing postpandemic disruption in a safety net EU. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 135-138 e1
  • 5 Lopetegui M, Yen PY, Lai A. et al. Time motion studies in healthcare: what are we talking about?. J Biomed Inform 2014; 49: 292-299
  • 6 Friedman DM, Sokal SM, Chang Y. et al. Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 10-14
  • 7 Day LW, Belson D. Studying and incorporating efficiency into gastrointestinal endoscopy centers. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 764153
  • 8 Weinbroum AA, Ekstein P, Ezri T. Efficiency of the operating room suite. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 244-250
  • 9 Overdyk FJ, Harvey SC, Fishman RL. et al. Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 896-906
  • 10 Day LW, Belson D, Dessouky M. et al. Optimizing efficiency and operations at a California safety-net endoscopy center: a modeling and simulation approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 762-773
  • 11 Kaushal NK, Chang K, Lee JG. et al. Using efficiency analysis and targeted intervention to improve operational performance and achieve cost savings in the endoscopy center. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 637-645
  • 12 Yong E, Zenkova O, Saibil F. et al. Efficiency of an endoscopy suite in a teaching hospital: delays, prolonged procedures, and hospital waiting times. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 760-764
  • 13 Zamir S, Rex DK. An initial investigation of efficiency in endoscopy delivery. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1968-1972
  • 14 Berg B, Denton B, Nelson H. et al. A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite. Med Decis Making 2010; 30: 380-387
  • 15 Yang D, Summerlee R, Suarez AL. et al. Evaluation of interventional EU efficiency metrics at a tertiary academic medical center. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E143-E148
  • 16 Almeida R, Paterson WG, Craig N. et al. A patient flow analysis: identification of process inefficiencies and workflow metrics at an ambulatory EU. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 2016: 2574076
  • 17 Bjorkman DJ. Efficiency in endoscopy: imperatives and pitfalls. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1054-1055
  • 18 Gellad ZF, Thompson CP, Taheri J. EU efficiency: quality redefined. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1046-1049 e1
  • 19 Rex DK, Lahue BJ, Dronzek RW. Impact of two procedure rooms per physician on productivity and computer simulation examines the impact of process change in the hospital gastroenterology department. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: AB154
  • 20 Harewood GC, Chrysostomou K, Himy N. et al. A "time-and-motion" study of endoscopic practice: strategies to enhance efficiency. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1043-1050