CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(06): E750-E756
DOI: 10.1055/a-2316-7638
Innovation forum

Single-center experience with intraprocedural cleansing system to improve inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy

1   Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
,
Nicha Wongjarupong
1   Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
2   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
,
Natalie Wilson
1   Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
,
Bryant Megna
1   Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
2   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
,
Vijay Are
1   Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
2   Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14400)
,
Anders Westanmo
3   Gastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN20040)
,
Susan Lou
3   Gastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN20040)
,
3   Gastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN20040)
,
Brian J Hanson
3   Gastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN20040)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Inadequate bowel preparation is common despite various preprocedure interventions. There is a need for an intervention at the time of colonoscopy to combat poor preparation. In this retrospective, observational study of 46 patients, we evaluated the clinical efficacy and feasibility of implementing the third generation of the Pure-Vu EVS System, a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared over-the-scope-based intraprocedural cleansing device, into our practice at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). To study clinical efficacy, we measured bowel preparation adequacy before and after using the device, as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Score, and reviewed colonoscopy surveillance interval recommendations. Technical success and feasibility of using the device were measured by procedure success rates and duration. We found that BBPS scores increased from 4.4 to 7.9 when using the device. Technical success was achieved 78.3% of the time (36/46 cases). Median colonoscopy duration was 46 minutes, although there was a trend toward shorter procedures over time. This is the first clinical evaluation of the third generation of an intraprocedural cleansing device. We found the device efficacious and easy to use with low procedure failure rates, but it does come with a learning curve. We suspect that adoption of this device mutually will benefit patients and health systems with the potential to improve resource utilization.



Publication History

Received: 02 January 2024

Accepted after revision: 24 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 April 2024

Article published online:
06 June 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T. et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1197-1203
  • 2 Sadeghi A, Rajabnia M, Bagheri M. et al. Predictive factors of inadequate bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2022; 15: 66-78
  • 3 Martel M, Ménard C, Restellini S. et al. Which patient-related factors determine optimal bowel preparation?. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2018; 16: 406-416
  • 4 Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 30: 819-826
  • 5 Yee R, Manoharan S, Hall C. et al. Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: what are the predictors of an inadequate preparation?. Am J Surg 2015; 209: 787-792
  • 6 Lebwohl B, Wang TC, Neugut AI. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2014-2020
  • 7 Miniter C. Patient education after inadequate bowel preparation: Improving care and outcomes. Fed Pract 2021; 38: 328-331
  • 8 Parra-Blanco A, Ruiz A, Alvarez-Lobos M. et al. Achieving the best bowel preparation for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 17709-17726
  • 9 Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F. et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 775-794
  • 10 Hernández G, Gimeno-García AZ, Quintero E. Strategies to Improve Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6: 245
  • 11 Pérez Jiménez J, Diego Bermúdez L, Gralnek IM. et al. An intraprocedural endoscopic cleansing device for achieving adequate colon preparation in poorly prepped patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 53: 530-534
  • 12 van Keulen KE, Neumann H, Schattenberg JM. et al. A novel device for intracolonoscopy cleansing of inadequately prepared colonoscopy patients: a feasibility study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 85-92
  • 13 Tran MN, Abdulla H, Merwat S. et al. S219 Single center experience with an oversleeve-based inter-procedural colon cleansing device. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116: S97
  • 14 Neumann H, Latorre M, Zimmerman T. et al. A multicenter, prospective, inpatient feasibility study to evaluate the use of an intra-colonoscopy cleansing device to optimize colon preparation in hospitalized patients: the REDUCE study. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21: 232
  • 15 Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G. et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-625
  • 16 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: A consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 463-485e465
  • 17 Gorard DA, McIntyre AS. Completion rate to caecum as a quality measure of colonoscopy in a district general hospital. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 243-249
  • 18 Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A. et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 721-731
  • 19 Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR. et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1696-1700
  • 20 Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 31-53
  • 21 Herman T, Wilson N, Wongjarupong N. et al. An intraprocedural cleansing system to improve inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy. VideoGIE 2023; 9: 179-181