Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(07): E842-E848
DOI: 10.1055/a-2333-8002
Original article

Incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy: Risk factors and cost-effectiveness of real-time viewing

Matilde Topa 
1   Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9304)
,
Alessandro Rimondi 
2   Post graduate Specialization in Gastrointestinal Diseases, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9304)
,
Andrea Sorge
1   Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9304)
,
Veronica Smania
1   Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9304)
,
Lucia Scaramella
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
,
Nicoletta Nandi
1   Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9304)
,
Flaminia Cavallaro
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
,
Maurizio Vecchi
1   Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9304)
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
,
Luca Elli 
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
,
Gian Eugenio Tontini
1   Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9304)
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims International guidelines recommend real-time viewing (RTV) in capsule endoscopy for gastric emptying monitoring, yet it is often overlooked in clinical practice. We aimed to assess risk factors for incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and evaluate the clinical relevance and cost-effectiveness of RTV implementation.

Methods We included consecutive SBCEs from 2013 to 2020. RTV was not applied per local protocol. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for incomplete SBCE, including prolonged gastric transit time (GTT) and prolonged small bowel transit time (SBTT).

Results Analyzing 858 SBCEs, we observed a completion rate of 94.6%. Prolonged GTT and SBTT were present in 4.9% and 18.2% of complete SBCEs, and in 13% (P=0.03) and 10.8% (P=0.24) of incomplete SBCEs, respectively. Only 0.7% (6 of 858) had incomplete SBCE with prolonged GTT. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, a modifiable (prolonged GTT odds ratio [OR] 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–7.5) and two unmodifiable risk factors (inpatient status OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1–4.5) and history of incomplete SBCE (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.3–13.7) were independently linked to higher incomplete SBCE rates. The pretest completion probability was 90.5% and 95.8% in patients with and without unmodifiable risk factors, respectively (P <0.01). The direct cost of systematic RTV adoption and prokinetics administration would be €5059, aiming to identify and treat each case of prolonged GTT associated with incomplete SBCE.

Conclusions Modern devices make incomplete SBCE rare, usually not tied to prolonged GTT. In a low-incidence scenario, widespread RTV use brings high costs and uncertain effectiveness.

Keywords

Endoscopy Small Bowel - Capsule endoscopy - Quality and logistical aspects - Quality management - Small bowel endoscopy


Publication History

Received: 27 December 2023

Accepted after revision: 06 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
27 May 2024

Article published online:
03 July 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Yazici C, Losurdo J, Brown MD. et al. Inpatient capsule endoscopy leads to frequent incomplete small bowel examinations. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 5051
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Robinson CA, Jackson C, Condon D. et al. Impact of inpatient status and gender on small-bowel capsule endoscopy findings. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1061-1066
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Shibuya T, Mori H, Takeda T. et al. The relationship between physical activity level and completion rate of small bowel examination in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy. Intern Med 2012; 51: 997-1001
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ogata H, Kumai K, Imaeda H. et al. Clinical impact of a newly developed capsule endoscope: usefulness of a real-time image viewer for gastric transit abnormality. J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 186-192
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hosono K, Endo H, Sakai E. et al. Optimal approach for small bowel capsule endoscopy using polyethylene glycol and metoclopramide with the assistance of a real-time viewer. Digestion 2011; 84: 119-125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Shiotani A, Honda K, Kawakami M. et al. Use of an external real-time image viewer coupled with prespecified actions enhanced the complete examinations for capsule endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 1270-1274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Cotter J, de Castro FD, Magalhães J. et al. Finding the solution for incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5: 595-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rondonotti E, Spada C, Adler S. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 423-446
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lazaridis LD, Tziatzios G, Toth E. et al. Implementation of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommendations for small-bowel capsule endoscopy into clinical practice: Results of an official ESGE survey. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 970-980
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Topa M, Nandi N, Scaramella L. et al. Clinical impact of videocapsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy in non-bleeding small bowel lesions. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ben-Soussan E, Savoye G, Antonietti M. et al. Factors that affect gastric passage of video capsule. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 785-790
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tontini GE, Wiedbrauck F, Cavallaro F. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy with panoramic view: results of the first multicenter, observational study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 401-408.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pascual Torres D, Brú Budesca X. Costes de la endoscopia digestiva en un Hospital Universitario de nivel II. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 26: 279-287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Loras C, Mayor V, Fernández-Bañares F. et al. Study of the standard direct costs of various techniques of advanced endoscopy. Comparison with surgical alternatives. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50: 689-697
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Goldberg MJ, Kosinski L. Activity-based costing and management in a hospital-based GI unit. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M. et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335: 806-808
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Freitas M, Silva VM, Xavier S. et al. Prolonged gastric transit time in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: Which patients are at risk and what are the implications?. Turkish J Gastroenterol 2023; 34: 227-233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Tontini GE, Manfredi G, Orlando S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography and small-bowel endoscopy: Present and future. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 627-643
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Koulaouzidis A, Giannakou A, Yung DE. et al. Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2013; 29: 1171-1185
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Girelli CM, Soncini M, Rondonotti E. Implications of small-bowel transit time in the detection rate of capsule endoscopy: A multivariable multicenter study of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 697
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ouazana S, Baltes P, Toth E. et al. Endoscopic gastrointestinal placement of capsule endoscopy to investigate the small bowel: A multicentric European retrospective series of 630 procedures in adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2024;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bortoluzzi F, Sorge A, Vassallo R. et al. Sustainability in gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy: Position Paper from the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists (AIGO). Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54: 1623-1629
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Sorge A, Tontini GE, Scaramella L. et al. Could war and the supply chain crisis affect the sustainability of gastrointestinal endoscopy and single-use endoscopes?. Gut Published Online First: 2023; 72: 407-408
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar