CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(07): E905-E913
DOI: 10.1055/a-2337-3865
Original article

Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the United States: Large, untutored, single-operator experience

Mai A Khalaf
1   Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN3989)
2   Tropical Medicine and infectious diseases, Tanta University Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt (Ringgold ID: RIN68782)
,
Fares Ayoub
1   Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN3989)
,
Kristen A Staggers
3   Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN3989)
,
Johanna W El-Haj
4   College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN14743)
,
Salmaan Jawaid
1   Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN3989)
,
1   Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN3989)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows removal of tumors en-bloc. Western adoption of ESD has been hindered by its steep learning curve. Western data regarding ESD learning curve are limited. We analyzed the learning curve of a single endoscopist at a tertiary referral center in the United States.

Patients and methods All consecutive ESDs performed by a single endoscopist at a tertiary referral center in the United States from 2015 through 2022 were identified. Descriptive statistics and CUSUM analysis were used to describe the learning curve for en-bloc, R0 resection, and resection speed.

Results In our study, 503 patients with 515 lesions were included. Severe submucosal fibrosis was found in 17% of the lesions. The rates of en-bloc, R0, and curative resections were 81.9%, 71.1%, and 68.4%, respectively. CUSUM analysis showed that the learning curve plateaued at 268, 347, and 170 cases for en-bloc resection, R0 resection, and achieving a resection speed > 9 cm2/hr. Fibrosis significantly affected the R0 resection rate in the regression analysis (95% confidence interval 0.21–0.55). In colonic ESD curve analysis, the learning plateau was reached after 185 cases for both en-bloc and R0 resection.

Conclusions Following ex-vivo training in an animal model, an untutored expert operator achieved competency in ESD between 250 and 350 procedures. Our data can inform development of future training programs in the West.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 20 September 2023

Accepted after revision: 29 May 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
03 June 2024

Article published online:
25 July 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Hirao M, Masuda K, Asanuma T. et al. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer and other tumors with local injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 264-269
  • 2 Russo P, Barbeiro S, Awadie H. et al. Management of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E239-E259 DOI: 10.1055/a-0732-487. (PMID: 30705959)
  • 3 Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 361-389 DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-0874. (PMID: 36882090)
  • 4 Draganov PV, Chang M, Coman RM. et al. Role of observation of live cases done by Japanese experts in the acquisition of ESD skills by a western endoscopist. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4675-4680
  • 5 Zhang X, Ly EK, Nithyanand S. et al. Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection with an untutored, prevalence-based approach in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 580-588.e581
  • 6 Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T. et al. Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 302-306 DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01005.x. (PMID: 21175483)
  • 7 Steinbrück I, Faiss S, Dumoulin FL. et al. Predictive factors for the outcome of unsupervised endoscopic submucosal dissection during the initial learning curve with prevalence-based indication. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68: 3614-3624
  • 8 Wagner A, Neureiter D, Kiesslich T. et al. Single-center implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the colorectum: Low recurrence rate after intention-to-treat ESD. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 354-363 DOI: 10.1111/den.12995. (PMID: 29218732)
  • 9 Jawaid S, Keihanian T, Khalaf M. et al. Settings of a novel electrosurgical generator to enable efficient and safe submucosal endoscopic procedures. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E743-E751 DOI: 10.1055/a-2085-3757. (PMID: 37941733)
  • 10 Ismail MS, Bahdi F, Mercado MO. et al. ESD with double-balloon endoluminal intervention platform versus standard ESD for management of colon polyps. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E1273-E1279
  • 11 Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M. et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1078-1085.e1078
  • 12 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. (PMID: 20189503)
  • 13 Kim Y-I. Ambulatory endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms: trends and associated factors in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.12.021.
  • 14 Keihanian T, Zabad N, Khalaf M. et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel suturing device for closure of large defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 381-391 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.006. (PMID: 37061137)
  • 15 Ebigbo A, Probst A, Römmele C. et al. Step-up training for colorectal and gastric ESD and the challenge of ESD training in the proximal colon: results from a German Center. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E524-E530
  • 16 Rönnow CF, Uedo N, Toth E. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E1340-E1348
  • 17 Peery AF, Cools KS, Strassle PD. et al. Increasing rates of surgery for patients with nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the United States. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 1352-1360.e1353
  • 18 Moon N, Aryan M, Khan W. et al. Effect of referral pattern and histopathology grade on surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 702-711.e702
  • 19 Iqbal S, Ali A, Razzaq A. et al. Lack of proper reimbursement is hampering adoption of minimally invasive gastrointestinal endoscopy in North America. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12: 49-52 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i1.49. (PMID: 31942234)
  • 20 Wang AY. Training in endoscopic submucosal dissection from a Western perspective. Techniq Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 19: 159-169