Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-2351-0647
Mechanical evaluation of the dilation force of dilation devices during interventional endoscopic ultrasound
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/202408/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-2351-0647-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims To insert the metal stent delivery system (8.5F) during interventional endoscopic ultrasound (I-EUS), several dilation steps are needed, which may be related to increased bile leakage from a fistula. There have been no definitive studies of dilation force. The aim of the present study was to evaluate dilation force during I-EUS using several dilation devices.
Methods In the present study, seven dilation devices were evaluated including bougie dilators such as a straight-shaped dilator (the ES dilator, Soehendra dilator, a standard ERCP catheter) a screw-shaped dilator (Tornus ES, Soehendra stent retriever), and a 4-mm balloon catheter (REN biliary balloon catheter, Hurricane RX). The diameter of each dilator and dilation force were measured.
Results Of the bougie dilators, the dilation force of the ES dilator was the highest (0.908±0.035 kg). Of the balloon catheters, the dilation force of the Hurricane RX (3.261±0.024 kg) was slightly higher than that of the REN (3.159±0.072 kg). Of the bougie dilators, although the diameter of the ES dilator was not larger than that of the Tornus ES, the dilation force was stronger. Similarly, the diameter of the Soehendra stent retriever was greater than that of the ERCP catheter or Soehendra dilator and the dilation force was lower.
Conclusions Compared with bougie dilators, balloon catheters have stronger dilation force according to our experimental study. The present results should be evaluated in clinical trials.
Publication History
Received: 22 April 2024
Accepted after revision: 13 June 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 June 2024
Article published online:
08 August 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Giovannini M. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 28: S44-S49 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_47_19. (PMID: 31897377)
- 2 Dell'Anna G, Ogura T, Vanella G. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary interventions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 60–61: 101810
- 3 Ogura T, Ohama H, Higuchi K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic transmural stenting and transmural intervention. Clin Endosc 2020; 53: 429-435 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2019.130. (PMID: 31771320)
- 4 Ogura T, Itoi T. Technical tips and recent development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy. DEN Open 2021; 1: e8 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.8. (PMID: 35310149)
- 5 Ogura T, Higuchi K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: technical review and tips to prevent adverse events. Gut Liver 2021; 15: 196-205 DOI: 10.5009/gnl20096. (PMID: 32694240)
- 6 Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Feasibility and safety of using Soehendra stent retriever as a new technique for biliary access in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 2725-2730 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2725. (PMID: 25759542)
- 7 Kobori I, Hashimoto Y, Shibuki T. et al. Safe performance of track dilation and bile aspiration with ERCP catheter in EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with plastic stents: A retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 4986
- 8 Ogawa T, Kanno Y, Koshita S. et al. Prospective feasibility study on the efficacy and safety of a novel spiral dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. DEN Open 2022; 3: e170 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.170. (PMID: 36262217)
- 9 Hattori N, Ogura T, Ueno S. et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel drill dilator as the first-line tract dilation technique during EUS-guided biliary drainage by nonexpert hands (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 1153-1157
- 10 Amano M, Ogura T, Onda S. et al. Prospective clinical study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using novel balloon catheter (with video). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32: 716-720
- 11 Honjo M, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T. et al. Safety and efficacy of ultra-tapered mechanical dilator for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and pancreatic duct drainage compared with electrocautery dilator (with video). Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 376-382
- 12 Ueshima K, Ogura T, Nishioka N. et al. Technical feasibility of EUS-guided antegrade dilation for hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture using novel endoscopic device (with videos). United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 419-423
- 13 Bessho K, Ogura T, Ueno S. et al. Moving scope technique improves technical success rate of device insertion during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video). Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231207004.
- 14 Nakamura J, Ogura T, Ueno S. et al. Liver impaction technique improves technical success rate of guidewire insertion during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video). Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231188562.
- 15 Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1276-1284
- 16 Guo J, Giovannini M, Sahai AV. et al. A multi-institution consensus on how to perform EUS-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 356-365 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_53_18. (PMID: 30531022)
- 17 Teoh AYB, Dhir V, Kida M. et al. Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel. Gut 2018; 67: 1209-1228
- 18 Yamamoto Y, Ogura T, Nishioka N. et al. Risk factors for adverse events associated with bile leak during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 110-115
- 19 Ogura T, Iwatsubo T, Sakamoto J. et al. Troubleshooting for difficult removal of a stent delivery system after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy 2023; 55: E790-E791 DOI: 10.1055/a-2094-9374. (PMID: 37308152)
- 20 Ogura T, Uba Y, Tomita M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade dilation using a drill dilator for hepaticojejunostomy stricture with cholangioscopic findings. Endoscopy 2023; 55: E525-E526