The impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on ventricular catheter placement in cerebrospinal fluid shunts – a single-center study

Abstract

Purpose Misplacement of ventricular catheters during shunt surgery occurs in 40% of cases using a freehand technique and therefore represents a risk for early shunt failure. The goal of this retrospective, single-center study is to analyze the impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on ventricular catheter positioning and early outcome of shunt survival.

Materials and Methods We analyzed the charts and images of all patients who underwent shunt surgery from 09/2017 to 12/2022 and compared the position of the ventricular catheter using the freehand technique and real-time ultrasound guidance. Central catheter position was graded as grade I (optimal), II (contact with ventricle structures or contralateral), and III (misplacement).

Results A ventricular catheter was placed in 244 patients using real-time US guidance and in 506 patients using a freehand technique. The mean age (53.4 and 53.6 years, respectively) and the preoperative frontal occipital horn ratio (FOHR; 0.47 versus 0.44) were almost equal in both groups. In the study group, grade I catheter position was achieved in 64% of cases, grade II in 34%, and grade III in 2%. The control group showed grade I position in 45%, grade II in 32%, and grade III in 23% of cases (p<0.05). An early central catheter failure rate was the highest in grade III (40.5%) compared to 4% in grade I.

Conclusion Our data demonstrate that real-time US guidance leads to a significant improvement in ventricular catheter placement. Consequently, early shunt revisions decrease significantly. Further prospective, randomized, and controlled studies comparing the standard method to real-time ultrasound catheter placement are required.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Eine fehlerhafte Platzierung von Ventrikelkathetern bei einer Shunt-Operation tritt in 40% der Fälle auf, wenn die Freihandtechnik verwendet wird, und stellt daher ein Risiko für ein frühzeitiges Shunt-Versagen dar. Ziel dieser retrospektiven Single-Center-Studie ist es, die Auswirkungen der Echtzeit-Ultraschallführung auf die Positionierung des Ventrikelkatheters und das frühe Outcome der Shunt-Funktion zu analysieren.

Material und Methoden Wir analysierten die Diagramme und Bilder aller Patienten, die sich zwischen 09/2017 und 12/2022 einer Shunt-Operation unterzogen, und verglichen die Position des Ventrikelkatheters bei Einsatz der Freihandtechnik und der Echtzeit-Ultraschallführung. Die zentrale Katheterposition wurde als Grad I (optimal), II (Kontakt mit Ventrikelstrukturen oder kontralateral) und III (Fehlplatzierung) eingestuft.

Ergebnisse Ventrikelkatheter wurde bei 244 Patienten unter Echtzeit-Ultraschallführung und bei 506 Patienten mittels Freihandtechnik platziert. Das Durchschnittsalter (53,4 bzw. 53,6 Jahre) und die präoperative „Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio“ (FOHR; 0,47 bzw. 0,44) waren in beiden Gruppen nahezu gleich. In der Studiengruppe wurde in 64% der Fälle Katheterposition Grad I erreicht, in 34% Grad II und in 2% Grad III. In der Kontrollgruppe wurde in 4% der Fälle Katheterposition Grad I erzielt, in 32% der Fälle Grad II und in 23% der Fälle Grad III (p<0,05). Die Rate des frühen Katheterversagens war bei Grad III am höchsten (40,5%), im Vergleich zu 4% bei Grad I.

Schlussfolgerung Unsere Daten zeigen, dass die Echtzeit-Ultraschallführung zu einer signifikanten Verbesserung der Platzierung von Ventrikelkathetern führt. Folglich gehen frühe Shunt-Revisionen signifikant zurück. Weitere prospektive, randomisierte und kontrollierte Studien, in denen die Standardmethode mit der Platzierung des Katheters in Echtzeit-Ultraschall verglichen wird, sind erforderlich.

Keywords

shunt - US-guided - ventricular catheter

Publication History

Received: 31 March 2023

Accepted after revision: 25 June 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 June 2024

Article published online:
07 November 2024

• References

• 1 Whitehead WE, Jea A, Vachhrajani S. et al. Accurate placement of cerebrospinal fluid shunt ventricular catheters with real-time ultrasound guidance in older children without patent fontanelles. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 406-410
• 2 Whitehead WE, Riva-Cambrin J, Wellons 3rd JC. et al. Factors associated with ventricular catheter movement and inaccurate catheter location: post hoc analysis of the hydrocephalus clinical research network ultrasound-guided shunt placement study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 14: 173-178
• 3 Whitehead WE, Riva-Cambrin J, Wellons 3rd JC. et al. No significant improvement in the rate of accurate ventricular catheter location using ultrasound-guided CSF shunt insertion: a prospective, controlled study by the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 12: 565-574
• 4 Faillace WJ. A no-touch technique protocol to diminish cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. Surg Neurol 1995; 43: 344-350
• 5 Farahmand D, Hilmarsson H, Högfeldt M. et al. Perioperative risk factors for short term shunt revisions in adult hydrocephalus patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 1248-1253
• 6 Hayhurst C, Beems T, Jenkinson MD. et al. Effect of electromagnetic-navigated shunt placement on failure rates: a prospective multicenter study. J Neurosurg 2010; 113: 1273-1278
• 7 Chandler WF, Knake JE, McGillicuddy JE. et al. Intraoperative use of real-time ultrasonography in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 157-163
• 8 Wilson TJ, Stetler WR, Al-Holou WN. et al. Comparison of the accuracy of ventricular catheter placement using freehand placement, ultrasonic guidance, and stereotactic neuronavigation. J Neurosurg 2013; 119: 66-70
• 9 Schaumann A, Thomale UW. Guided Application of Ventricular Catheters (GAVCA)--multicentre study to compare the ventricular catheter position after use of a catheter guide versus freehand application: study protocol for a randomised trail. Trials 2013; 14: 428
• 10 Heussinger N, Eyüpoglu IY, Ganslandt O. et al. Ultrasound-guided neuronavigation improves safety of ventricular catheter insertion in preterm infants. Brain Dev 2013; 35: 905-911
• 11 Lind CR, Tsai AM, Lind CJ. et al. Ventricular catheter placement accuracy in non-stereotactic shunt surgery for hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16: 918-920
• 12 Kestle JR, Drake JM, Cochrane DD. et al. Lack of benefit of endoscopic ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion: a multicenter randomized trial. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 284-290
• 13 O’Hayon BB, Drake JM, Ossip MG. et al. Frontal and occipital horn ratio: A linear estimate of ventricular size for multiple imaging modalities in pediatric hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998; 29: 245-249
• 14 Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Butler J. et al. Outcomes of CSF shunting in children: comparison of Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network cohort with historical controls: clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 12: 334-338
• 15 Levitt MR, O’Neill BR, Ishak GE. et al. Image-guided cerebrospinal fluid shunting in children: catheter accuracy and shunt survival. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012; 10: 112-117
• 16 Drake JM, Kestle JR, Milner R. et al. Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 294-303
• 17 Saladino A, White JB, Wijdicks EF. et al. Malplacement of ventricular catheters by neurosurgeons: a single institution experience. Neurocrit Care 2009; 10: 248-252
• 18 Sampath R, Wadhwa R, Tawfik T. et al. Stereotactic placement of ventricular catheters: does it affect proximal malfunction rates?. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2012; 90: 97-103
• 19 Sainte-Rose C, Piatt JH, Renier D. et al. Mechanical complications in shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 1991; 17: 2-9
• 20 Bierbrauer KS, Storrs BB, McLone DG. et al. A prospective, randomized study of shunt function and infections as a function of shunt placement. Pediatr Neurosurg 1990; 16: 287-291
• 21 Kast J, Duong D, Nowzari F. et al. Time-related patterns of ventricular shunt failure. Childs Nerv Syst 1994; 10: 524-528
• 22 Abu-Serieh B, Ghassempour K, Duprez T. et al. Stereotactic ventriculoperitoneal shunting for refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 1039-1043
• 23 Azeem SS, Origitano TC. Ventricular catheter placement with a frameless neuronavigational system: a 1-year experience. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 243-247
• 24 Hermann EJ, Capelle HH, Tschan CA. et al. Electromagnetic-guided neuronavigation for safe placement of intraventricular catheters in pediatric neurosurgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012; 10: 327-333
• 25 Thomale UW, Gebert AF, Haberl H. et al. Shunt survival rates by using the adjustable differential pressure valve combined with a gravitational unit (proGAV) in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29: 425-431
• 26 Clark S, Sangra M, Hayhurst C. et al. The use of noninvasive electromagnetic neuronavigation for slit ventricle syndrome and complex hydrocephalus in a pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008; 2: 430-434
• 27 Haberl EJ, Messing-Juenger M, Schuhmann M. et al. Experiences with a gravity-assisted valve in hydrocephalic children. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009; 4: 289-294
• 28 Theodosopoulos PV, Abosch A, McDermott MW. Intraoperative fiber-optic endoscopy for ventricular catheter insertion. Can J Neurol Sci 2001; 28: 56-60
• 29 O’Leary ST, Kole MK, Hoover DA. et al. Efficacy of the Ghajar Guide revisited: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 2000; 92: 801-803
• 30 Shkolnik A, McLone DG. Intraoperative real-time ultrasonic guidance of ventricular shunt placement in infants. Radiology 1981; 141: 515-517
• 31 Rubin JM, Dohrmann GJ. Use of ultrasonically guided probes and catheters in neurosurgery. Surg Neurol 1982; 18: 143-148
• 32 Strowitzki M, Moringlane JR, Steudel W. Ultrasound-based navigation during intracranial burr hole procedures: experience in a series of 100 cases. Surg Neurol 2000; 54: 134-144
• 33 Strowitzki M, Komenda Y, Eymann R. et al. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided puncture of the ventricular system. Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24: 65-69
• 34 Hsieh CT, Chen GJ, Ma HI. et al. The misplacement of external ventricular drain by freehand method in emergent neurosurgery. Acta Neurol Belg 2011; 111: 22-28