Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2370-6900
Synthesis of Diarylpyrrole Pseudo-Natural Products: Cyanide-Mediated Nitrile-to-Nitrile Cyclocondensation and C–H Acidity-Guided Regioselectivity
We are grateful to CSIR-New Delhi [02(0441/21/EMR-II)] and SERB, New Delhi (Sanction Nos.: CRG/2020/000256 and EMR/2015/002379) for financial support of this study. D.S., T.K., and A.A. express their gratitude to NIPER S.A.S. Nagar for their fellowships.
Abstract
Pseudo-natural products (pseudo-NPs), the chemically reengineered molecular skeletons generated by the deconstruction of NPs into fragments and their subsequent recombination, have gained immense attention in recent times owing to their ability to occupy a significant portion of the medicinally relevant NP-based molecular space, their possession of novel bioactivities, and their ability to address chemical and biological challenges. In this study, the reassembly of fragments of combretastatin, steganacin, podophyllotoxin, colchicine, and other natural products and drug molecules by a cis-lock fusion-edge recombination led to the generation of diarylpyrrole pseudo-NP-functionalized skeletons, named combretapyrroles. These combretapyrroles were synthesized with excellent substrate scope in good yields by a new cyanide-mediated nitrile-to-nitrile cycloaddition reaction of a vic-dinitrile combined with 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine-mediated desilylative cleavage of TMSCN and in situ generation of cyanide. The differential acidity of the benzylic C–H moieties of the vic-dinitrile intermediate was found to influence regioselectivity in the mechanistic pathway and to provide different products. A cheminformatic analysis showed that the combretapyrroles occupy a unique drug-relevant chemical space that is rarely covered by NPs. Combretapyrroles also were found to possess drug-like physicochemical properties.
Key words
pseudo-natural product - nitriles - cyclocondensation - cyclization - regioselectivity - diarylpyrrolesSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2370-6900.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 23 June 2024
Accepted: 22 July 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
22 July 2024
Article published online:
08 August 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1 Newman DJ, Cragg GM. J. Nat. Prod. 2020; 83: 770
- 2a Karageorgis G, Reckzeh ES, Ceballos J, Schwalfenberg M, Sievers S, Ostermann C, Pahl A, Ziegler S, Waldmann H. Nat. Chem. 2018; 10: 1103
- 2b Grigalunas M, Brakmann S, Waldmann H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022; 144: 3314
- 3 Karageorgis G, Foley DJ, Laraia L, Waldmann H. Nat. Chem. 2020; 12: 227
- 4 Liu J, Otte F, Strohmann C, Waldmann H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021; 76: 153228
- 5 Aoyama H, Davies C, Liu J, Pahl A, Kirchhoff J.-L, Scheel R, Sievers S, Strohmann C, Grigalunas M, Waldmann H. Chem. Eur. J. 2024; 30: e202303027
- 6 Kaur R, Kaur G, Gill RK, Soni R, Bariwal J. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014; 87: 89
- 7 Pérez-Pérez M.-J, Priego E.-M, Bueno O, Martins MS, Canela M.-D, Liekens S. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 59: 8685
- 8a Chaudhary V, Venghateri JB, Dhaked HP. S, Bhoyar AS, Guchhait SK, Panda D. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 59: 3439
- 8b Giri P, Batra PJ, Kumari A, Hura N, Adhikary R, Acharya A, Guchhait SK, Panda D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2023; 95: 117489
- 8c Hura N, Sawant AV, Kumari A, Guchhait SK, Panda D. ACS Omega 2018; 3: 9754
- 8d Hura N, Naaz A, Prassanawar SS, Guchhait SK, Panda D. ACS Omega 2018; 3: 1955
- 8e Sanghai N, Jain V, Preet R, Kandekar S, Das S, Trivedi N, Mohapatra P, Priyadarshani G, Kashyap M, Das D, Satapathy S, Siddharth S, Guchhait SK, Kundu CN, Bharatam PV. MedChemComm 2014; 5: 766
- 9 Domagala A, Jarosz T, Lapkowski M. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 100: 176
- 10 Ferreira VF, de Souza MC. B. V, Cunha AC, Pereira LO. R, Ferreira ML G. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2001; 33: 411
- 11 Diana-Rivero R, Halsvik B, García Tellado F, Tejedor D. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 4078
- 12 Su Z, Wang S, Luo N, Wang C. Synlett 2020; 31: 1022
- 13 Guchhait SK, Sisodiya S, Saini M, Shah YV, Kumar G, Daniel DP, Hura N, Chaudhary V. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 5807
- 14a Ertl P, Roggo S, Schuffenhauer A. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008; 48: 68
- 14b Vanii Jayaseelan K, Moreno P, Truszkowski A, Ertl P, Steinbeck C. BMC Bioinf. 2012; 13: 106
- 15a Sorokina M, Steinbeck C. J. Cheminf. 2019; 11: 55
- 15b https://docs.api.naturalproducts.net (accessed Jul 30, 2024)
- 16 Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng H.-Y, Smith BR, Ward KW, Kopple KD. J. Med. Chem. 2002; 45: 2615
- 17 Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 42717
- 18 5-Amino-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-phenyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonitrile (1b) and 5-Amino-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonitrile (1c); Typical Procedure A sealed tube was charged with the acrylonitrile 1 (1 mmol, 235 mg), 1,4-dioxane (1.6 mL), H2O (0.4 mL), and TMG (1 mmol, 4 equiv, 0.5 mL), and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. TMSCN (1 mmol, 3 equiv, 0.38 mL) was then added and the tube was sealed. The mixture was stirred at 95 °C until the reaction was complete (TLC), and the resulting mixture was worked up with H2O and CH2Cl2. The organic solution was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under vacuum in a rotary evaporator. The crude product was purified by column chromatography [silica gel (100–200 mesh), EtOAc–hexane (50%)] to give 1b and 1c in yields of 46% and 39%, respectively. 1c Orange solid; yield: 132 mg (46%); mp 167–177 ℃. FTIR (Neat, ATR): 2836, 2189, 1603, 1527, 1245, 1175, 762 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.45 (s, 1 H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.13 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.89 (s, 2 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 159.09, 138.81, 135.66, 133.46, 131.53, 130.25, 129.75, 129.55, 129.36, 128.91, 126.46, 124.91, 117.23, 114.06, 113.96, 106.50, 90.38, 55.29. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H15N3NaO: 312.1113; found: 312.1119