Prospective single-arm trial on feasibility and safety of an endoscopic robotic system for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection

Abstract

Background The development of the EndoMaster “Endoluminal Access Surgical Efficacy” (EASE) system aims to enhance the safety and efficacy of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) through two flexible robotic arms. This is the first clinical trial to evaluate the performance of colorectal ESD using EndoMaster.

Method Patients with early mucosal colorectal neoplasia that was not suitable for en bloc resection with snare-based techniques were recruited. The EndoMaster EASE robotic system consisted of an independently designed flexible robotic platform with two robotic arms. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate using EndoMaster. Secondary outcomes included operating time, hospital stay, procedure-related complications, and oncologic outcomes.

Results 43 patients underwent robotic ESD, with a median robotic dissection time of 49 minutes. The technical success rate was 86.0%, while en bloc resection rate among cases with technical success was 94.6%. The complete resection rate was 83.8% and the median size of specimen was 35 mm (range 15–90 mm). The median hospital stay was 2 (range 1–7) days and there was one delayed bleed after 4 days, which was controlled endoscopically. One patient sustained perforation during the procedure, which was completely closed using clips without sequelae. Two patients were treated by salvage surgery.

Conclusion This first clinical trial confirmed the safety and efficacy of performing colorectal ESD using the EndoMaster EASE robotic system.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. Februar 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 06. September 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
06. September 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. November 2024

• References

• 1 Dragovich T. Colon Cancer. 2018 Zugriff am 27. Juni 2018 unter: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/277496-overview
• 2 Sumimoto K, Tanaka S, Shigita K. et al. Diagnostic performance of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for differentiation among noninvasive, superficially invasive, and deeply invasive colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 700-709
• 3 Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y. et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2020; 32: 219-239 DOI: 10.1111/den.13545. (PMID: 31566804)
• 4 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 591-62 DOI: 10.1055/a-1811-7025. (PMID: 35523224)
• 5 Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 361-389 DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-0874. (PMID: 36882090)
• 6 Arezzo A, Passera R, Marchese N. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 4: 18-29 DOI: 10.1177/2050640615585470. (PMID: 26966519)
• 7 Lim XC, Nistala KRY, Ng CH. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single arm analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27: 3925-3939
• 8 Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T. et al. Endoscopic en bloc versus piecemeal resection of large nonpedunculated colonic adenomas: a randomized comparative trial. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177: 29-38 DOI: 10.7326/M23-1812. (PMID: 38079634)
• 9 Ebigbo A, Probst A, Römmele C. et al. Step-up training for colorectal and gastric ESD and the challenge of ESD training in the proximal colon: results from a German Center. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E524-E530
• 10 Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K. et al. Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 862-870 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377205. (PMID: 25208032)
• 11 Saito Y, Abe S, Inoue H. et al. How to perform a high-quality endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastroenterology 2021; 161: 405-410 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.051. (PMID: 34089735)
• 12 Cui Y, Thompson CC, Chiu PWY. et al. Robotics in therapeutic endoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 402-410
• 13 Phee SJ, Reddy N, Chiu PW. et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection is effective in treating patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1117-1121
• 14 Chiu PWY, Ho KY, Phee SJ. Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel robotic system (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1172-1177 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.042. (PMID: 32991869)
• 15 Masgnaux LJ, Grimaldi J, Rivory J. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by adaptive traction: results of the first 54 procedures. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 205-211 DOI: 10.1055/a-2109-4350. (PMID: 37311544)
• 16 Phee SJ, Low SC, Sun ZL. et al. Robotic system for no-scar gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Med Robot 2008; 4: 15-22 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.179. (PMID: 18314917)
• 17 Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, Sunada K. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors more than 50 mm in diameter. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 602-607
• 18 Cao L, Li XG, Phan PT. et al. Sewing up the wounds: A robotic Suturing System for Flexible Endoscopy. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 2019; 27: 45-54