Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(10): E1171-E1182
DOI: 10.1055/a-2415-9414
Original article

Antibiotic prophylaxis in digestive endoscopy: Guidelines from the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy

David Karsenti 
1   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Clinique Paris-Bercy, Charenton-le-Pont, France (Ringgold ID: RIN568079)
2   Gastroenterology, Centre d'Explorations Digestives, Paris, France
,
Rodica Gincul
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN89686)
,
Arthur Belle
4   Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
,
Ariane Vienne
5   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Privé d' Antony, Antony, France (Ringgold ID: RIN55030)
6   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
,
Emmanuel Weiss
7   Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (Ringgold ID: RIN55100)
,
Geoffroy Vanbiervliet 
8   Pôle DIGi-TUNED, Endoscopie Digestive, CHU de Nice, Hôpital L'Archet 2, Nice, France
,
Olivier Gronier
9   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Clinique Sainte Barbe, Strasbourg, France
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Digestive endoscopy is a highly dynamic medical discipline, with the recent adoption of new endoscopic procedures. However, comprehensive guidelines on the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in these new procedures have been lacking for many years. The Guidelines Commission of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED) convened in 2023 to establish guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in digestive endoscopy for all digestive endoscopic procedures, based on literature data up to September 1, 2023. This article summarizes these new guidelines and describes the literature review that fed into them.

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasonography - Endoscopy Upper GI Tract - Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Pancreatobiliary (ERCP/PTCD) - Quality and logistical aspects - Quality management


Publication History

Received: 13 March 2024

Accepted after revision: 13 September 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 September 2024

Article published online:
15 October 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M. et al. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation 2007; 116: 1736-1754
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Riphaus A. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline Development Policy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 626-629
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Habib G, Hoen B, Tornos P. et al. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009). The Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal 2009; 30: 2369-2413
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Martin C, Auboyer C, Boisson M. et al. Antibioprophylaxis in surgery and interventional medicine (adult patients). Update 2017. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2019; 38: 549-562
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1645-1654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Khashab MA, Chithadi KV. AcostaRD. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Bianco JA, Pepe MS, Higano C. et al. Prevalence of clinically relevant bacteremia after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in bone marrow transplant recipients. Am J Med 1990; 89: 134-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J. et al. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25: 107-131
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Piraino B, Bernardini J, Brown E. et al. ISPD position statement on reducing the risks of peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Perit Dial Int 2011; 31: 614-630
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Khashab MA, Chithadi KV. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Gweon TG, Jung SH, Kim SW. et al. Risk factors for peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who undergo colonoscopy: a retrospective multicentre study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19: 175
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kim JS, Jung E, Kang SH. et al. Safety of endoscopy in peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 12: e00379
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 O'Connor HJ, Hamilton I, Lincoln C. et al. Bacteremia with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy - a reappraisal. Endoscopy 1983; 15: 21-23
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Liu Y, Chen Y, Shu X. et al. Prophylactic antibiotics may be unnecessary in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection due to the low incidence of bacteremia. Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 3788-3794
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kawata N, Tanaka M, Kakushima N. et al. The low incidence of bacteremia after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) obviates the need for prophylactic antibiotics in esophageal ESD. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 5084-5090
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Maselli R, Oliva A, Badalamenti M. et al. Single-dose versus short-course prophylactic antibiotics for peroral endoscopic myotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 922-929
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hastier-De Chelle A, Onana-Ndong P, Olivier R. et al. Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis and conditioning modalities in per-oral ndoscopic myotomy for esophageal motor disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57: 1522-1530
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Chun YJ, Yoon NR, Park JM. et al. Prospective assessment of risk of bacteremia following colorectal stent placement. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 1045-1049
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 La Regina D, Mongelli F, Fasoli A. et al. Clinical adverse events after endoscopic resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis on the antibiotic prophylaxis. Dig Dis 2020; 38: 15-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Shichijo S, Takeuchi Y, Shimodate Y. et al. Performance of perioperative antibiotics against postendoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 349-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Khashab MA, Chithadi KV. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Baron PL. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 854-858
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Chang KJ, Nguyen P, Erickson RA. et al. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Barawi M, Gottlieb K, Cunha B. et al. A prospective evaluation of the incidence of bacteremia associated with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 189-192
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Levy MJ, Norton ID, Wiersema MJ. et al. Prospective risk assessment of bacteremia and other infectious complications in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 672-678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Janssen J, König K, Knop-Hammad V. et al. Frequency of bacteremia after linear EUS of the upper GI tract with and without FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 339-344
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S. et al. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 622-629
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 O'Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotçarena R. et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 470-474
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. Prospective assessment of diagnostic utility and complications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Results from a newly developed academic endoscopic ultrasound program. Dig Dis 2008; 26: 356-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA. et al. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 204-208
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Carrara S, Arcidiacono PG, Mezzi G. et al. Pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: complication rate and clinical course in a single centre. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42: 520-523
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Wang KX, Ben QW, Jin ZD. et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 283-290
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Jenssen C, Alvarez-Sánchez MV, Napoléon B. et al. Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 4659-4676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Polkowski M, Larghi A, Weynand B. et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 190-206
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Katanuma A, Maguchi H, Yane K. et al. Factors predictive of adverse events associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 2093-1099
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Banafea O, Mghanga FP, Zhao J. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration for histological diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16: 108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Rodriguez-D'Jesus A, Mghanga FP, Zhao J. et al. Adverse events of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cystic and solid lesions by using the lexicon proposed in an ASGE workshop: a prospective and comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 780-784
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Yoshinaga S, Itoi T, Yamao K. et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic masses: A prospective multicenter study. Dig Endosc 2020; 32: 114-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Levy MJ, Norton ID, Clain JE. et al. Prospective study of bacteremia and complications With EUS FNA of rectal and perirectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 684-689
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Levy MJ, Norton ID, Clain JE. et al. Prospective evaluation of adverse events following lower gastrointestinal tract EUS FNA. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 676-685
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P. et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 989-1006
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Zhu H, Jiang F, Zhu J. et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 667-675
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Allison MC, Sandoe JA, Tighe R. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 2009; 58: 869-680
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D. et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: a population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19: 56-66
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Haenni M, Dagot C, Chesneau O. et al. Environmental contamination in a high-income country (France) by antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and antibiotic resistance genes: Status and possible causes. Environ Int 2022; 159: 107047
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Guarner-Argente C, Shah P, Buchner A. et al. Use of antimicrobials for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective, comparative analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Facciorusso A, Buccino VR, Turco A. et al. Antibiotics do not decrease the rate of infection after endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 2308-2315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Facciorusso A, Arevalo-Mora M, Conti Bellocchi MC. et al. Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on infection rate after endoscopic ultrasound through-the-needle biopsy of pancreatic cysts: a propensity score-matched study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12: 211
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Colan-Hernandez J, Sendino O, Loras C. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not required for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions, based on a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1642-1649 e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Klein A, Qi R, Nagubandi S. et al. Single-dose intra-procedural ceftriaxone during endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts is safe and effective: results from a single tertiary center. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30: 237-241
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Facciorusso A, Mohan BP, Tacelli M. et al. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 14: 999-1005
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Facciorusso A, Buccino VR, Sacco R. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in pancreatic cysts: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 32: 1084-1090
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Facciorusso A, Kovacevic B, Yang D. et al. Predictors of adverse events after endoscopic ultrasound through-the-needle biopsy of pancreatic cysts: a recursive partitioning analysis. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 1158-1168
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Fazel A, Moezardalan K, Varadarajulu S. et al. The utility and the safety of EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of duplication cysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 575-580
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Diehl DL, Cheruvattath R, Facktor MA. et al. Infection after endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration of mediastinal cysts. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10: 338-340
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Annema JT, Veseliç M, Versteegh MI. et al. Mediastinitis caused by EUS-FNA of a bronchogenic cyst. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 791-793
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Wildi SM, Hoda RS, Fickling W. et al. Diagnosis of benign cysts of the mediastinum: the role and risks of EUS and FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 362-368
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Ryan AG, Zamvar V, Roberts SA. Iatrogenic candidal infection of a mediastinal foregut cyst following endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 838-839
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Westerterp M, van den Berg JG, van Lanschot JJ. et al. Intramural bronchogenic cysts mimicking solid tumors. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1119-1122
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Bournet B, Migueres I, Delacroix M. et al. Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years' experience at a referral center. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 349-354
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Banerjee S, Shen B. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 791-798
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Han C, Lin R, Liu J. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy for differentiation of benign and malignant pelvic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 3771-3781
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Grandjean JP, Mantion GA, Guinier D. et al. Vestigial retrorectal cystic tumors in adults: a review of 30 cases. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008; 32: 769-778
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Young NA, Neeson T, Bernal D. et al. Retrorectal cystic hamartoma diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6: 359-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Rathinamanickam H, Pawa S. A tailgut cyst diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. ACG Case Rep J 2015; 3: 33-35
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Hall DA, Pu RT, Pang Y. Diagnosis of foregut and tailgut cysts by endosonographically guided fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2007; 35: 43-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Pinto-Marques P, Damião-Ferreira J, Mendonça E. et al. Unusual cause of CA 19.9 elevation diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a retrorectal tailgut cyst. Endoscopy 2012; 44: E248-E249
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Siddiqui FA, Chopra R, Al-Marzooq Y. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of tailgut cyst: a rare entity. Acta Cytol 2014; 58: 217-220
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Rzouq F, Brown J, Fan F. et al. The utility of lower endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 48: 127-130
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Mohamadnejad M, Al-Haddad MA, Sherman S. et al. Utility of EUS-guided biopsy of extramural pelvic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 146-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Kaushik N, Khalid A, Brody D. et al. EUS-guided paracentesis for the diagnosis of malignant ascites. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 908-913
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 DeWitt J, LeBlanc J, McHenry L. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 609-615
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Peter S, Eltoum I, Eloubeidi MA. EUS-guided FNA of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with unknown primary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1266-1270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Nguyen PT, Chang KJ. EUS in the detection of ascites and EUS-guided paracentesis. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 336-339
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Srinivasan R. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of peritoneal nodules in patients with ascites of unknown cause. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1010-1013
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M, Kunda R. et al. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 310-332
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 409-416
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 Hoffman BJ. EUS-guided celiac plexus block/neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: S26-S28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 O'Toole TM, Schmulewitz N. Complication rates of EUS-guided celiac plexus blockade and neurolysis: results of a large case series. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 593-597
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 80 Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML. et al. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pain due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 2330-2337
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 81 Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Lisotti A. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based--a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 8424-8448
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 82 Sharma VK, Howden CW. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3133-3136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 83 Schembre D, Bjorkman DJ. Review article: endoscopy related infections. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993; 7: 347-355
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 84 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Infection control during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 836-841
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 85 Thevenot T, Degand T, Grelat N. et al. A French national survey on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients. Liver International 2013; 33: 389-397
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 86 Bernard B, Grange JD, Khac EN. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta- analysis. Hepatology 1999; 29: 1655-1661
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 87 Goulis J, Armonis A, Patch D. et al. Bacterial infection is independently associated with failure to control bleeding in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Hepatology 1998; 2: 1207-1212
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 88 Lee TH, Huang CT, Lin CC. et al. Similar rebleeding rate in 3-day and 7-day intravenous ceftriaxone prophylaxis for patients with acute variceal bleeding. J Formos Med Assoc 2016; 115: 547-552
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 89 de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G. et al. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2022; 76: 959-974
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 90 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G. et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 91 Chen M, Wang L, Wang Y. et al. Risk factor analysis of post-ERCP cholangitis: A single-center experience. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int HBPD INT 2018; 17: 55-58
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 92 Lee JG, Lee CE. Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 476-477
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 93 Olsson G, Enochsson L, Swahn F. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ERCP with failed cannulation. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56: 336-341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 94 Navaneethan U, Jegadeesan R, Nayak S. et al. ERCP-related adverse events in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 410-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 95 Merchan MFS, de Moura DTH, de Oliveira GHP. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14: 718-730
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 96 Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GL. et al. ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 97 Thosani N, Zubarik RS, Kochar R. et al. Prospective evaluation of bacteremia rates and infectious complications among patients undergoing single-operator choledochoscopy during ERCP. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 424-431
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 98 Othman MO, Guerrero R, Elhanafi S. et al. A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 99 Saxena P, Singh VK, Lennon AM. et al. Endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis after metal stent placement in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 175-178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 100 Saleem A, Leggett CL, Murad MH. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the patency of covered and uncovered selfexpandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant bile duct obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 321-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 101 Almadi MA, Barkun AN, Martel M. No benefit of covered vs uncovered self-expandable metal stents in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 27-37
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 102 Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L. et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 127-149
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 103 Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 32-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 104 Comité de pilotage Sociétè française d’anesthésie et de reanimation. Antibioprophylaxie en chirurgie et médecine interventionnelle. (patients adultes). 2018 https://sfar.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Antibioprophylaxie-RFE-mise-a-jour-2018.pdf
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar