PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(11): E1342-E1344
DOI: 10.1055/a-2451-8572
Editorial

Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor

Maddalena Menini
1   Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
,
Cesare Hassan 
1   Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
2   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Keywords

Endoscopy Upper GI Tract - Endoscopy Lower GI Tract


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. September 2024

Angenommen: 09. Oktober 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. November 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Einführung zu:

Discharging the duty of candor following delayed post-endoscopy cancer diagnosisEndosc Int Open 2024; 12(11): E1345-E1348
DOI: 10.1055/a-2459-1240

 

  • References

  • 1 Han C, Wu F, Xu J. Effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Front Oncol 2024; 14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Noh CK, Lee E, Lee GH. et al. Association of intensive endoscopic screening burden with gastric cancer detection. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2032542
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hamashima C. Benefits and harms of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 6385
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Menon S, Trudgill N. How commonly is upper gastrointestinal cancer missed at endoscopy? A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2014; 02: E46-E50
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P. et al. Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1661-1674.e11
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Juul FE, Cross AJ, Schoen RE. et al. Effectiveness of colonoscopy screening vs sigmoidoscopy screening in colorectal cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7: e240007
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Anderson JC, Robinson CM, Hisey W. et al. Colonoscopy findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ patients versus in colonoscopy-only patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data. Cancer Prev Res 2022; 15: 455-464
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 de Pierola LBF, Cubiella J, Mugica F. et al. Malignant colorectal polyps: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. In: Bustamante M. colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening - future directions. London: InTech; 2013
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Anderson R, Burr NE, Valori R. Causes of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers based on World Endoscopy Organization system of analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1287-1299.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Rutter MD, Beintaris I, Valori R. et al. World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 909-925.e3
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ. et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-956
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 le Clercq CMC, Bouwens MWE, Rondagh EJA. et al. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut 2014; 63: 957-963
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Alexandre L, Tsilegeridis-Legeris T, Lam S. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics associated with post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2022; 162: 1123-1135
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wieszczy P, Regula J, Kaminski MF. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31: 441-446
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hassan C, Piovani D, Spadaccini M. et al. Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 212-225.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Haghbin H, Zakirkhodjaev N, Aziz M. Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8: 19-19
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS. et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar