CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ultraschall Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2474-6617
Original Article

Identification of differentiating sonographic features between fibroadenomas and malignant tumors of the breast mimicking fibroadenomas: 10-year experience in 421 histologically verified cases

Identifizierung sonographischer Unterscheidungsmerkmale zwischen Fibroadenomen und malignen Fibroadenom-imitierenden Tumoren der Brust: 10-jährige Erfahrung in 421 histologisch verifizierten Fällen
Michael Swoboda
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
Daniel Egle
2   Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN155817)
,
Valentin Ladenhauf
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
Malik Galijasevic
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
Christoph Plöbst
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
Silke Haushammer
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
Birgit Amort
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
Mathias Pamminger
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
,
Leonhard Gruber
1   Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN27280)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose

Ultrasound is a highly effective imaging tool for assessing abnormalities within the breast. However, especially the identification of malignant tumors of the breast mimicking fibroadenomas (MTMF) by means of breast ultrasound can be challenging. This study aimed to identify reliable imaging characteristics of MTMF.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics review board. After screening 623 patients, 421 cases with histologically verified fibroadenomas and MTMF between 2011 and 2021 were included. Sonographic features were compared to histopathological results and an algorithm-based quantitative ranking of predictors contributing most to the correct classification of malignant tumors was conducted.

Results

A total of 363 benign, 18 intermediate, and 40 malignant lesions were analyzed. Algorithm-based quantitative ranking showed that the most predictive features indicating malignancy were a hyperechoic rim (gain ratio merit 0.135 ± 0.004), an irregular border (0.057 ± 0.002), perilesional stiffening (0.054 ± 0.002), pectoral contact (0.051 ± 0.003), an irregular shape (0.029 ± 0.001), and irregular vasculature (0.027 ± 0.002).

Conclusion

Ultrasound findings for fibroadenomas vary, making identification of MTMF challenging. Features such as indistinct margins and increased perilesional echogenicity are predictors for malignancy and should be considered during sonographic evaluation of fibroadenomas and MTMF.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Fibroadenome sind relativ häufige benigne Läsionen der weiblichen Brust, jedoch kann die sonografische Unterscheidung zwischen gutartigen Fibroadenomen und malignen fibroadenom-imitierenden Tumoren der Brust eine Herausforderung darstellen. Ziel dieser Studie war es, zuverlässige Bildgebungsmerkmale zur Identifizierung fibroadenom-ähnlicher maligner Tumoren festzustellen.

Material und Methode

Nach Screening von 623 Patienten wurden 421 Fälle mit histologisch verifizierten Fibroadenomen und fibroadenom-ähnlichen malignen Tumoren eingeschlossen. Die sonografischen Merkmale wurden mit dem histopathologischen Resultat verglichen, und eine algorithmusbasierte quantitative Rangordnung der Prädiktoren, die am meisten zur korrekten Klassifikation intermediärer und maligner Tumoren beitrugen, wurde durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt wurden 363 benigne, 18 intermediäre und 40 maligne Brustläsionen eingeschlossen. Die algorithmusbasierte quantitative Rangordnung zeigte, dass die am prädiktivsten Merkmale für Malignität ein hyperechogener Randsaum (gain ratio merit 0,135 ± 0,004), unregelmäßige Ränder (0,057 ± 0,002), periläsionale Verhärtung (0,054 ± 0,002), pektoraler Kontakt (0,051 ± 0,003), unregelmäßige Form (0,029 ± 0,001) und eine chaotische Gefäßversorgung (0,027 ± 0,002) waren.

Schlussfolgerung

Bildgebende Charakteristika für Fibroadenome im Ultraschall variieren, was die Identifizierung von malignen fibroadenom-imitierenden Tumoren erschweren kann. Bei der sonografischen Beurteilung sollten daher klassische Malignitätskriterien wie unscharfe Berandung oder periläsionale Echo-Genitätssteigerung beachtet werden.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 20 June 2024

Accepted after revision: 06 November 2024

Article published online:
04 February 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74: 12-49
  • 2 Sood R, Rositch AF, Shakoor D. et al. Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Detection Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Global Oncol 2019;
  • 3 Dialani V, Chansakul T, Lai KC. et al. Enlarging biopsy-proven fibroadenoma: Is surgical excision necessary?. Clin Imaging 2019; 57: 35-39
  • 4 Salati SA. Breast fibroadenomas: a review in the light of current literature. Polish Journal of Surgery 2020; 93: 40-48
  • 5 Evans A, Jethwa K. Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast: improving the accuracy of imaging diagnosis and reducing unnecessary biopsy. Br J Radiol 2023; 96
  • 6 Rubio IT, Wyld L, Marotti L. et al. European guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) developed jointly by EUSOMA, EUSOBI, ESP (BWG) and ESSO. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2024; 50: 107292
  • 7 Yoon GY, Cha JH, Kim HH. et al. Sonographic features that can be used to differentiate between small triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma. Ultrasonography 2018; 37: 149-156
  • 8 Bode MK, Rissanen T, Apaja-Sarkkinen M. Ultrasonography and core needle biopsy in the differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma and tumor phyllodes. Acta radiol 2007; 48: 708-713
  • 9 Fatima K, Masroor I, Khanani S. Probably benign solid breast lesions on ultrasound: Need for biopsy reassessed. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2018; 19: 3467-3471
  • 10 Cho SH, Park SH. Mimickers of breast malignancy on breast sonography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2013; 32: 2029-2036
  • 11 Zhang M, Arjmandi FK, Porembka JH. et al. Imaging and Management of Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics 2023; 43
  • 12 Siotos C, McColl M, Psoter K. et al. Tumor Site and Breast Cancer Prognosis. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18: e1045-e1052
  • 13 Guo R, Lu G, Qin B. et al. Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 37-70
  • 14 Kim YR, Kim HS, Kim HW. Are irregular hypoechoic breast masses on ultrasound always malignancies?: A pictorial essay. Korean J Radiol 2015; 16: 1266-1275
  • 15 Wojcinski S, Soliman AA, Schmidt J. et al. Sonographic Features of Triple-Negative and Non-Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2012; 31: 1531-1541
  • 16 Kuba MG, Giess CS, Wieczorek TJ. et al. Hyperechoic malignancies of the breast: Underlying pathologic features correlating with this unusual appearance on ultrasound. Breast Journal 2020; 26: 643-652
  • 17 Hashmi A, Ackerman S, Irshad A. Color Doppler sonography: Characterizing breast lesions. Imaging Med 2010; 2: 151-163
  • 18 Pha M, Sehgal CM, Arger PH. et al. from the Departments of Radiology (C Quantitative Vascularity of Breast Masses by Doppler Imaging: Regional Variations and Diagnostic Implications. 1999
  • 19 Busilacchi P, Draghi F, Preda L. et al. Has color Doppler a role in the evaluation of mammary lesions?. J Ultrasound 2012; 15: 93-98
  • 20 Mehta TS, Raza S, Baum JK. Use of doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of breast carcinoma. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2000; 21: 297-307
  • 21 Lee S-W, Choi HY, Baek SY. et al. Role of color and power doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 2002; 30: 459-464
  • 22 Raza S, Baum JK. Solid breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US. Radiology 1997; 203: 164-168
  • 23 Strano S, Gombos EC, Friedland O. et al. Color Doppler imaging of fibroadenomas of the breast with histopathologic correlation. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 2004; 32: 317-322
  • 24 Deeg J, Swoboda M, Egle D. et al. Shear-Wave Elastography Gradient Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Breast Tumours: A Critical Analysis. Diagnostics 2024; 14: 1657
  • 25 Yi A, Cho N, Chang JM. et al. Sonoelastography for 1786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1033-1040
  • 26 Yerli H, Yilmaz T, Kaskati T. et al. Qualitative and Semiquantitative Evaluations of Solid Breast Lesions by Sonoelastography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2011; 30: 179-186
  • 27 Gruber L, Deeg J, Egle D. et al. Peritumoural Strain Elastography of Newly Diagnosed Breast Tumours: Does Maximum Peritumoural Halo Depth Correlate with Tumour Differentiation and Grade?. Diagnostics 2023; 13: 2064
  • 28 Dahan M, Hequet D, Bonneau C. et al. Has tumor doubling time in breast cancer changed over the past 80 years? A systematic review. Cancer Med 2021; 10: 5203-5217