Int J Sports Med 2025; 46(04): 255-262
DOI: 10.1055/a-2493-0617
Physiology & Biochemistry

Muscle-specific neuromuscular responses during running with blood flow restriction

1   Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, USA
,
Christopher E. Proppe
2   Human Performance Studies, Wichita State University, Wichita, USA
,
Paola M. Rivera
3   School of Sport Sciences, Endicott College School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Beverly, USA
,
Mason A. Howard
1   Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, USA
,
Anuj J. Prajapati
1   Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, USA
,
Niriham M. Shah
1   Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, USA
,
Nihar N. Patel
1   Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, USA
,
Shane M. Hammer
4   Department of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA
,
Michael A. Trevino
4   Department of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA
,
Taylor K. Dinyer-McNeely
4   Department of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA
,
Roksana B. Zak
1   Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, USA
,
Ethan C. Hill
1   Department of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida College of Health Professions and Sciences, Orlando, USA
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine muscle excitation at maximal running capacity without blood flow restriction (BFR) relative to submaximal running bouts with BFR. Fourteen college-aged males randomly completed four, three-minute running bouts at 70, 80, and 90% of peak speed with BFR (70%BFR, 80%BFR, and 90%BFR) and without BFR at 100% of their peak speed (100%NOBFR). The surface electromyographic amplitudes of the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and vastus medialis muscles were assessed. Muscle excitation of the vastus lateralis was similar across most bouts; however, it was lower during the 70%BFR compared to 90%BFR (Meandiff =−4.67±− 0.22%; Bayesian 95% high-density interval [HDI]: − 7.07 to − 2.2) and 100%NOBFR (Meandiff =−2.94±− 0.27%; 95% HDI:−5.33 to−0.50) bouts. For the rectus femoris, muscle excitation largely increased across running speeds (70%BFR<80%BFR < 90%BFR; 90%BFR < 100%NOBFR). For the vastus medialis, muscle excitation was lower during the 70%BFR compared to 90%BFR (Meandiff =−8.15±− 0.28%; 95% HDI:−15.3 to−0.89). Submaximal running with BFR increased muscle excitation responses for the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis, such that muscle excitation was similar to 100%BFR, despite 10–20% reductions in running speed. The rectus femoris muscle, however, was not affected by BFR during the submaximal running bouts.

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. September 2024

Angenommen: 27. November 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. Januar 2025

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Abe T, Kawamoto K, Yasuda T. et al. Eight days KAATSU-resistance training improved sprint but not jump performance in collegiate male track and field athletes. Int J KAATSU Training Res 2005; 1: 19-23
  • 2 Loenneke JP, Wilson JM, Marín PJ. et al. Low intensity blood flow restriction training: a meta-analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 1849-1859
  • 3 Moore DR, Burgomaster KA, Schofield LM. et al. Neuromuscular adaptations in human muscle following low intensity resistance training with vascular occlusion. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 92: 399-406
  • 4 Loenneke JP, Fahs CA, Wilson JM. et al. Blood flow restriction: The metabolite/volume threshold theory. Med Hypotheses 2011; 77: 748-752
  • 5 Loenneke JP, Fahs CA, Rossow LM. et al. The anabolic benefits of venous blood flow restriction training may be induced by muscle cell swelling. Med Hypotheses 2012; 78: 151-154
  • 6 Fatela P, Mendonca GV, Veloso AP. et al. Blood flow restriction alter motor unit behavior during resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 555-562
  • 7 Suga T, Okita K, Takada S. et al. Effect of multiple set on intramuscular metabolic stress during low-intensity resistance exercise with blood flow restriction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 3915-3920
  • 8 Jenkins NDM, Miramonti AA, Hill EC. et al. Greater neural adaptations following high-vs. low-load resistance training. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 331
  • 9 Wilson JM, Lowery RP, Joy JM. et al. Practical blood flow restriction training increases acute determinants of hypertrophy without increasing indices of muscle damage. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 3068-3075
  • 10 Mizushima Y, Uematsu A, Ishizaka H. et al. The effects of moderate blood flow restriction induced by KAATSU on muscle activation, heart rate, and rate of perceived exertion during low-intensity aerobic exercise: A pilot study. Int J KAATSU Training Res 2020; 16: 1-4
  • 11 Kim D, Loenneke JP, Thiebaud RS. et al. The acute muscular effects of cycling with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction. Acta Physiol Hung 2015; 102: 428-441
  • 12 Smith NDW, Girard O, Scott BR. et al. Blood flow restriction during self-paced aerobic intervals reduces mechanical and cardiovascular demands without modifying neuromuscular fatigue. Eur J Sport Sci 2023; 23: 755-765
  • 13 Bijker K, de Groot G, Hollander A. Differences in leg muscle activity during running and cycling in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 87: 556-561
  • 14 World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194
  • 15 Jones AM, Doust JH. A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 1996; 14: 321-327
  • 16 Schneider DA, Phillips SE, Stoffolano S. The simplified V-slope method of detecting the gas exchange threshold. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 1180-1184
  • 17 Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C. et al. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10: 361-374
  • 18 Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-240
  • 19 Lee SY, Song XY. Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behav Res 2004; 39: 653-686
  • 20 Rupp AA, Dey DK, Zumbo BD. To bayes or not to bayes, from whether to when: Applications of Bayesian methodology to modeling. Struct Equ Modeling 2004; 11: 424-451
  • 21 Chen DG, Fraser MW. A Bayesian approach to sample size estimation and the decision to continue program development in intervention research. J Soc Social Work Res 2017; 8: 457-470
  • 22 Chen YT, Hsieh YY, Ho JY. et al. Effects of running exercise combined with blood flow restriction on strength and sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 35: 3090-3096
  • 23 Mckee JR, Girard O, Peiffer JJ. et al. Continuous blood flow restriction during repeated-sprint exercise increases peripheral but not systemic physiological and perceptual demands. Eur J Sport Sci 2024; 24: 703-712
  • 24 Hill EC, Rivera PM, Proppe CE. et al. Greater neuromuscular fatigue following low-load blood flow restriction than non-blood flow restriction resistance exercise among recreationally active men. J Neurophysiol 2022; 128: 73-85
  • 25 Hill EC, Rivera PM, Proppe CE. et al. Acute effects of low load blood flow restricted and non restricted exercise on muscle excitation, neuromuscular efficiency, and average torque. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2023; 23: 165-174
  • 26 Scott BR, Loenneke JP, Slattery KM. et al. Exercise with blood flow restriction: An updated evidence-based approach for enhanced muscular development. Sports Med 2015; 45: 313-325
  • 27 Enoka RM, Duchateau J. Inappropriate interpretation of surface EMG signals and muscle fiber characteristics impedes understanding of the control of neuromuscular function. J Appl Physiol 2015; 119: 1516-1518
  • 28 Yasuda T, Brechue WF, Fujita T. et al. Muscle activation during low-intensity muscle contractions with varying levels of external limb compression. J Sports Sci Med 2008; 7: 467-474
  • 29 Olmos AA, Montgomery TR, Sears KN. et al. Blood flow restriction increases necessary muscle excitation of the elbow flexors during a single high-load contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2024; 124: 1807-1820
  • 30 Rainoldi A, Bullock-Saxton JE, Cavarretta F. et al. Repeatability of maximal voluntary force and of surface EMG variables during voluntary isometric contraction of quadriceps muscles in healthy subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2001; 11: 425-438
  • 31 Rainoldi A, Melchiorri G, Caruso I. A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles. J Neurosci Methods 2004; 134: 37-43
  • 32 Camic CL, Kovacs AJ, VanDusseldorp TA. et al. Application of the neuromuscular fatigue threshold treadmill test to muscles of the quadriceps and hamstrings. J Sport Health Sci 2020; 9: 628-633
  • 33 Zuniga JM, Malek MH. Electromyographic responses of the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles during incremental treadmill running. Muscle Nerve 2013; 48: 938-944
  • 34 Camic CL, Kovacs AJ, Enquist EA. et al. Muscle activation of the quadriceps and hamstrings during incremental running. Muscle Nerve 2015; 52: 1023-1029
  • 35 deVries HA, Tichy MW, Housh TJ. et al. A method for estimating physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold (PWCFT). Ergonomics 1987; 30: 1195-1204
  • 36 Gonzalez Rojas DH, Wizenberg AM, Rivera PM. et al. Acute effects of sprint interval training and blood flow restriction on neuromuscular and muscle function. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2024; 24: 38-46
  • 37 Camic CL, Housh TJ, Johnson GO. et al. An EMG frequency-based test for estimating the neuromuscular fatigue threshold during cycle ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 337-345
  • 38 Zuniga JM, Housh TJ, Camic CL. et al. A mechanomyographic fatigue threshold test for cycling. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 636-643
  • 39 Bergstrom HC, Housh TJ, Cochrane KC. et al. An examination of neuromuscular and metabolic fatigue thresholds. Physiol Meas 2013; 34: 1253-1267
  • 40 Iannetta D, Qahtani A, Millet GY. et al. Quadriceps muscles O2 extraction and EMG breakpoints during a ramp incremental test. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 686
  • 41 Arabadzhiev TI, Dimitrov VG, Dimitrov GV. The increase in surface EMG could be a misleading measure of neural adaptation during the early gains in strength. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014; 114: 1645-1655
  • 42 Vigotsky AD, Halperin I, Lehman GJ. et al. Interpreting signal amplitudes in surface electromyography studies in sport and rehabilitation sciences. Front Physiol 2018; 8: 985
  • 43 Siddique U, Rahman S, Frazer AK. et al. Determining the sites of neural adaptations to resistance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2020; 50: 1107-1128
  • 44 Mattocks KT, Jessee MB, Mouser JG. et al. The application of blood flow restriction: Lessons from the laboratory. Curr Sports Med Rep 2018; 17: 129-134