Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2503-1684
Endoscopic closure using a dedicated device following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study
Supported by: Japan Consortium for Advanced Surgical Endoscopy J-CASE Research GrantClinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): jRCT1072220065, Trial registry: Japan Medical Association Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.jmacct.med.or.jp/), Type of Study: Prospective
Background and study aims: The development of a simple, optimized closure method for mucosal defects left by gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is warranted. Herein, we developed a novel and dedicated closure device called FLEXLOOP and aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of the closure using FLEXLOOP following gastric ESD. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients clinically diagnosed with gastric neoplasms < 30 mm in size. Following gastric ESD, closure of the mucosal defect was performed using a FLEXLOOP with standard clips. The primary outcome was the complete closure rate. The secondary outcomes were procedure time, number of clips, sustained closure rate on second-look endoscopy on postoperative days (PODs) 5–7, and rate of post-ESD bleeding. Results: Overall, 35 patients were included in this study. The median specimen size was 32 mm. The mucosal defect was completely closed in 31 (89%; 95% confidence interval, 73–99%) patients and incompletely closed in 4 (11%) patients. The median closure time was 11 min, and the median number of clips was 10. Second-look endoscopy performed on PODs 5–7 demonstrated sustained, partially sustained, and unsustained closures in 7 (20%), 22 (63%), 6 (17%) patients, respectively. Post-ESD bleeding and complications related to FLEXLOOP were not observed. Conclusions: Closure using FLEXLOOP is feasible and safe. Our technique using this new device can be an attractive option for more easier approach to closing mucosal defects. However, further clinical research to confirm that this technique can prevent delayed complications is warranted.
Publication History
Received: 28 May 2024
Accepted after revision: 07 December 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
16 December 2024
© . The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany