CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25031995
DOI: 10.1055/a-2503-1995
Original article

Assessment of safety and patency of 7-mm covered metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer: Prospective multicenter study

1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
,
Yousuke Kobayashi
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Seirei Hamamatsu Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN13712)
,
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26389)
,
Takuji Iwashita
4   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN476117)
,
Junichi Kaneko
5   Department of Gastroenterology, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN13773)
,
Jun Ito
6   Department of Internal Medicine II, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12793)
,
Kazuma Ishikawa
1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
,
Junya Sato
1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
,
1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
,
Shinya Endo
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26389)
,
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26389)
,
Shinya Uemura
4   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN476117)
,
Keita Mori
7   Division of Clinical Trials, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: Century Medical Corporation Clinical Research Support Agreement

Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): jRCTs042200064, Trial registry: Japan Primary Registries Network (http://rctportal.niph.go.jp), Type of Study: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study

Abstract

Background and study aims

For preoperative biliary drainage of pancreatic cancer (PC), a 10-mm diameter metal stent (MS) is commonly used; however, the rate of pancreatitis is high. It is hypothesized that smaller-diameter MS may reduce the rate of pancreatitis. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 7-mm MS.

Patients and methods

Patients requiring initial biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice caused by PC and scheduled for surgery from six facilities were included. After endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, a 7-mm MS was placed at the site of biliary obstruction. The primary endpoint was the rate of pancreatitis, and the secondary endpoints included early and late adverse events (AEs). The pancreatitis rate was assumed to be 18% and 5% with 10- and 7-mm MS, respectively; with a power of 80% and one-sided significance level of 10%, the planned enrollment was 38 patients. If pancreatitis occurred in no more than three patients, this indicates that the 7-mm MS effectively reduced incidence of pancreatitis.

Results

Overall, 38 patients were enrolled, and 35 patients in whom a 7-mm MS was successfully placed were analyzed. All MS were placed after sphincterotomy. Pancreatitis occurred in four patients (11.4%) and no early AEs were observed. Surgery was performed in 24 patients and late AEs included stent occlusion in eight patients (23%) and cholecystitis in four patients (11%).

Conclusions

The 7-mm MS did not reduce incidence of pancreatitis among surgical candidates for PC.



Publication History

Received: 17 August 2024

Accepted after revision: 19 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 December 2024

Article published online:
13 January 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Yousuke Kobayashi, Shinya Kawaguchi, Takuji Iwashita, Junichi Kaneko, Jun Ito, Kazuma Ishikawa, Junya Sato, Fumitaka Niiya, Shinya Endo, Tatsunori Satoh, Shinya Uemura, Keita Mori. Assessment of safety and patency of 7-mm covered metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer: Prospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25031995.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2503-1995
 
  • References

  • 1 Global Burden of Disease 2017 Pancreatic Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4: 934-947
  • 2 Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C. et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: v56-68
  • 3 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS. et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: Indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline - Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 910-930
  • 4 Okusaka T, Nakamura M, Yoshida M. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for pancreatic cancer 2022 from the Japan Pancreas Society: A synopsis. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28: 493-511
  • 5 Motoi F, Kosuge T, Ueno H. et al. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019; 49: 190-194
  • 6 Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H. et al. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matched analysis. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 515-522
  • 7 Nagino M, Hirano S, Yoshitomi H. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019. 3rd English ed. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021; 28: 26-54
  • 8 Ishiwatari H, Sato J, Sakamoto H. et al. Current status of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for distal and hilar biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2024; 36: 969-980
  • 9 Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J. et al. Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 2541-2556
  • 10 Tol JA, van Hooft JE, Timmer R. et al. Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer. Gut 2016; 65: 1981-1987
  • 11 Mutneja HR, Vohra I, Go A. et al. Temporal trends and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the United States: A nationwide analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 357-366
  • 12 Song TJ, Lee JH, Lee SS. et al. Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of malignant biliary obstruction before primary surgical resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 814-821
  • 13 Mandai K, Tsuchiya T, Kawakami H. et al. Fully covered metal stents vs plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 1185-1194
  • 14 Kawashima H, Hashimoto S, Ohno E. et al. Comparison of 8- and 10-mm diameter fully covered self-expandable metal stents: A multicenter prospective study in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 439-447
  • 15 Japan Pancreas Society. General Rules for the Study of Pancreatic Cancer. 7th ed. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara & Co, Ltd; 2016
  • 16 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Version 1. 2015. Accessed November 03, 2024 at: https://www2.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/archive/pancreas2015/english/pancreatic.pdf
  • 17 Isayama H, Hamada T, Yasuda I. et al. Tokyo criteria 2014 for transpapillary biliary stenting. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 259-264
  • 18 Cancer Research and Biostatistics. Binomial Confidence Interval. https://stattools.crab.org/Calculators/binomialConfidence.htm.
  • 19 Coté GA, Kumar N, Ansstas M. et al. Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis with placement of self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 748-754
  • 20 Harai S, Hijioka S, Yamada R. et al. Safety of biliary drainage with 6-mm metallic stent for preoperative obstructive jaundice in pancreatic cancer: Purple SIX STUDY. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39: 1442-1449
  • 21 Isayama H, Nakai Y, Toyokawa Y. et al. Measurement of radial and axial forces of biliary self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 37-44
  • 22 Kawakubo K, Isayama H, Nakai Y. et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following transpapillary self-expandable metal stent placement. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 771-776
  • 23 Gardner TB, Spangler CC, Byanova KL. et al. Cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of biliary stents in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 460-466
  • 24 Tamura T, Itonaga M, Ashida R. et al. Covered self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in patient receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Prospective randomized study. Dig Endosc 2021; 33: 1170-1178
  • 25 Satoh T, Ishiwatari H, Kawaguchi S. et al. Comparing the 14-mm uncovered and 10-mm covered metal stents in patients with distal biliary obstruction caused by unresectable pancreatic cancer: A multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 736-744
  • 26 Lakhtakia S, Tevethia HV, Inavolu P. et al. Bilateral balloon expandable biodegradable stent (Y-stent) for post cholecystectomy perihilar biliary stricture. VideoGIE 2021; 6: 80-83