Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25491165
DOI: 10.1055/a-2549-1165
Original article

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies versus retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices: Multicenter propensity matched analysis

Authors

  • Suprabhat Giri

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Ranjan Kumar Patel

    2   Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN410775)
  • Radhika Chavan

    3   Gastroenterology, Ansh Clinic, Ahmedabad, India (Ringgold ID: RIN609456)
  • Bhavik Bharat Shah

    4   Department of Gastroenterology, Shree Narayana Hospital, Raipur, India (Ringgold ID: RIN706422)
    5   Department of Gastroenterology, MediGenix Hospital, Raipur, India
  • Jimmy Narayan

    6   Department of Gastroenterology, SOA IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN250350)
  • Taraprasad Tripathy

    2   Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN410775)
  • Sushant Babbar

    7   Department of Interventional Radiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India (Ringgold ID: RIN29761)
  • Lalit Garg

    8   Department of Interventional Radiology, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India (Ringgold ID: RIN29783)
  • Rozil Gandhi

    9   Department of Interventional Radiology, Sushrut Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
  • Karan Manoj Anandpara

    10   Department of Interventional Radiology, Heart & Vascular Superspecialty Hospitals, India, India
  • Swati Das

    11   Department of Radiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Manjit Kanungo

    6   Department of Gastroenterology, SOA IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN250350)
  • Girish Kumar Pati

    6   Department of Gastroenterology, SOA IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN250350)
  • Hemanta K Nayak

    12   Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN410775)
  • Manas Kumar Panigrahi

    12   Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN410775)
  • Preetam Nath

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Saroj Kanta Sahu

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Dibya Lochan Praharaj

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Bipadabhanjan Mallick

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Sarat Chandra Panigrahi

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Sanjay Rajput

    13   Department of Gastroenterology, Ansh Clinic, Ahmedabad, India (Ringgold ID: RIN609456)
  • Jimil Shah

    14   Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (Ringgold ID: RIN29751)
  • Anil Chandra Anand

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)
  • Manoj Kumar Sahu

    1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India (Ringgold ID: RIN90946)

Abstract

Background and study aims

Retrograde transvenous obliteration (RTO) is an established technique for managing fundal varices. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided glue injection with or without coil is an alternate approach. The present study compared outcomes of EUS-guided therapies with RTO for managing fundal varices.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with fundal varices undergoing EUS-guided intervention or RTO at 10 tertiary centers in India and compared after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was variceal bleeding within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related adverse events (AEs), variceal obliteration, reintervention, and mortality.

Results

A total of 167 patients (EUS 108, RTO 59) were included, with 59 in each group after propensity score matching. Incidence of variceal bleeding (15.3% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.793) within 1 year was comparable between the groups. Procedure-related AEs were higher in the RTO group (22% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.007), primarily new onset or worsening of ascites. Variceal obliteration at 4 weeks was similar between groups (83.1% vs. 91.5%, P = 0.167). Although reintervention within 1 year of the index procedure (30.5% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.296) was comparable, the EUS group required more frequent reintervention for GVs (28.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.001), and the RTO group required more frequent reintervention for EVs (16.9% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.008).

Conclusions

EUS-guided therapy offers a safe and effective alternative to RTO for managing fundal varices. Although reintervention rate for GVs were higher than for EUS, incidence of AEs and reintervention for EVs was higher with RTO.



Publication History

Received: 11 December 2024

Accepted after revision: 27 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 February 2025

Article published online:
04 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Suprabhat Giri, Ranjan Kumar Patel, Radhika Chavan, Bhavik Bharat Shah, Jimmy Narayan, Taraprasad Tripathy, Sushant Babbar, Lalit Garg, Rozil Gandhi, Karan Manoj Anandpara, Swati Das, Manjit Kanungo, Girish Kumar Pati, Hemanta K Nayak, Manas Kumar Panigrahi, Preetam Nath, Saroj Kanta Sahu, Dibya Lochan Praharaj, Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Sarat Chandra Panigrahi, Sanjay Rajput, Jimil Shah, Anil Chandra Anand, Manoj Kumar Sahu. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies versus retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices: Multicenter propensity matched analysis. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25491165.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2549-1165
 
  • References

  • 1 Goral V, Yılmaz N. Current approaches to the treatment of gastric varices: Glue, coil application, TIPS, and BRTO. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019; 55: 335
  • 2 de Mattos ÂZ, Terra C, Farias AQ. et al. Alliance of Brazilian Centers for Cirrhosis Care–the ABC Group. Primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: A comparison of different strategies. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13: 628-637
  • 3 Saraswat VA, Verma A. Gluing gastric varices in 2012: lessons learnt over 25 years. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2012; 2: 55-69
  • 4 de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G. et al. Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2022; 76: 959-974
  • 5 Patel RK, Tripathy T, Chandel K. et al. Left-sided portal hypertension: what an interventional radiologist can offer?. Eur Radiol 2024;
  • 6 Sabry F, Seif S, Eldesoky A. et al. EUS-guided cyanoacrylate injection into the perforating vein versus direct endoscopic injection in the treatment of gastric varices. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E202-E210
  • 7 Wang Z, Zeng Z, Chen L. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided injection of cyanoacrylate in the treatment of gastroesophageal varices type 1: a single-center randomized study. Surg Endos 2023; 37: 8277-8284
  • 8 Giri S, Jearth V, Seth V. et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of endoscopic and radiological interventions for gastric varices: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Exp Hepatol 2023; 9: 57-70
  • 9 Chavan R, Baraldo S, Patel N. et al. Technical tips for EUS-guided embolization of varices and pseudoaneurysms. VideoGIE 2023; 9: 211-219
  • 10 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
  • 11 Baerlocher MO, Nikolic B, Sze DY. Adverse event classification: Clarification and validation of the society of interventional radiology specialty-specific system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34: 1-3
  • 12 Florencio de Mesquita C, Antunes V, Milioli NJ. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided coiling plus glue injection compared with endoscopic glue injection alone in endoscopic treatment for gastric varices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2024;
  • 13 Luo X, Xiang T, Wu J. et al. Endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for prevention of gastric variceal bleeding: A randomized controlled trial. Hepatology 2021; 74: 2074-2084
  • 14 Khare S, Arora A, Varghese J. et al. Safety and efficacy of novel cost-effective eus coiling and glue technique for the management of large gastric varices: A long-term follow-up study. J Dig Endosc 2024; 15: 222-227
  • 15 Mohan BP, Chandan S, Khan SR. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy versus direct endoscopic glue injection therapy for gastric varices: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 259-267
  • 16 Saad WE. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices: concept, basic techniques, and outcomes. Semin Intervent Radiol 2012; 29: 118-128
  • 17 Huang Z, Zhang W, Lv F. et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices with high-risk ectopic embolism: A multicenter and retrospective cohort study. Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 74-83
  • 18 Philips CA, Ahamed R, Rajesh S. et al. Beyond the scope and the glue: update on evaluation and management of gastric varices. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20: 361
  • 19 Kim YH, Kim YH, Kim CS. et al. Comparison of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) using ethanolamine oleate (EO), BRTO using sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) foam and vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39: 840-846
  • 20 Park JW, Yoo JJ, Kim SG. et al. Change in portal pressure and clinical outcome in cirrhotic patients with gastric varices after plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration. Gut Liver 2020; 14: 783-791
  • 21 Patel M, Molvar C. Evolution of retrograde transvenous obliteration techniques. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018; 35: 185-193
  • 22 Watanabe M, Shiozawa K, Ikehara T. et al. Short-term effects and early complications of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices. ISRN Gastroenterol 2012; 2012
  • 23 Shirane Y, Murakami E, Imamura M. et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration and liver stiffness measurement predict the prognosis of patients with gastric varices. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22: 535
  • 24 Kedia D, Kamani L, Begum MR. et al. Journey of women in gastroenterology in South Asian countries: From training to leadership. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2023; 13: 41-43
  • 25 Jamil H, Tariq W, Ameer MA. et al. Interventional radiology in low- and middle-income countries. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 77