Epithelium-preserving stricturotomy is effective for improving postoperative benign anastomotic stricture associated with colorectal surgery

Abstract

Background and study aims

We analyzed a large sample of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with endoscopic stricturotomy (ESt) for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture (POBAS) and explored risk factors for stricture recurrence (restricture). We aimed to provide data on the long-term outcomes of ESt and support for optimizing ESt in treating and preventing POBAS recurrence.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included 152 consecutive patients with CRC diagnosed with POBAS and treated by ESt at our center from April 2013 to April 2023. The primary outcome was stricture recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the technical success rate, postoperative adverse events (AEs), and restricture-free survival (RFS). Risk factors for stricture recurrence were explored.

Results

Of the 152 patients, 94.1% (143/152) achieved technical success after the first ESt. Twenty-two patients (17.5%) were diagnosed with recurrent stricture among 126 initial successful patients with follow-up. Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-preservation of intestinal epithelium during ESt were independent risk factors for recurrence (P < 0.05). The cumulative RFS rate was 82.53%.

Conclusions

Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-epithelium preservatoin at ESt were independent risk factors for restricture after ESt in POBAS patients. These two factors may help predict risk of POBAS recurrence and provide reliable evidence for developing personalized treatment plans for patients.

Keywords

Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Colorectal cancer - Endoscopy Upper GI Tract - Benign strictures

• References

• 1 Piastra V, Ganci F, Sacconi A. et al. Repurposed AT9283 triggers anti-tumoral effects by targeting MKK3 oncogenic functions in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Research 2024; 43: 234
• 2 Hu X, Guo P, Zhang N. et al. Nomogram for benign anastomotic stricture after surgery for rectal cancer. Asian J Surg 2023; 46: 111-119
• 3 Osera S, Ikematsu H, Odagaki T. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign severe anastomotic stricture after surgery for lower rectal cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 770-773
• 4 Lin D, Liu W, Chen Z. et al. Endoscopic stricturotomy for patients with postoperative benign anastomotic stricture for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65: 590-598
• 5 Lan N, Hull TL, Shen B. Endoscopic stricturotomy and ileo-colonic resection in patients with primary Crohn's disease-related distal ileum strictures. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2020; 8: 312-318
• 6 Mathew J, Kazi M, Sukumar V. et al. Factors predicting successful resolution and long-term outcomes of benign anastomotic strictures following rectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49: 1307-1313
• 7 Shen B, Kochhar G, Navaneethan U. et al. Role of interventional inflammatory bowel disease in the era of biologic therapy: A position statement from the Global Interventional IBD Group. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 215-237
• 8 Huang H, Gu Y, Ji L. et al. A new mixed surgical treatment for grades iii and iv hemorrhoids: modified selective hemorrhoidectomy combined with complete anal epithelial retention. Arq Bras Sur Dig 2021; 34: e1594
• 9 Polese L, Vecchiato M, Frigo AC. et al. Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic stenoses and their impact on quality of life: what are the lessons to learn?. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e124-128
• 10 Kim YI, Hong SW, Lim SB. et al. Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 1775-1783
• 11 Zhang LJ, Lan N, Wu XR. et al. Endoscopic stricturotomy in the treatment of anastomotic strictures in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and non-IBD patients. Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 8: 143-150
• 12 Pal P, Reddy DN. Interventional endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive review. Gastroenterol Rep 2024; 12: goae075
• 13 Lan N, Shen B. Endoscopic stricturotomy with needle knife in the treatment of strictures from inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 502-513
• 14 Lan N, Shen B. Endoscopic stricturotomy versus balloon dilation in the treatment of anastomotic strictures in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018; 24: 897-907
• 15 Lan N, Hull TL, Shen B. Endoscopic stricturotomy and ileo-colonic resection in patients with primary Crohn's disease-related distal ileum strictures. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2020; 8: 312-318
• 16 Lin HC, He QL, Shao WJ. et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III to IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: A randomized, noninferiority trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62: 223-233
• 17 Lin HC, He QL, Ren DL. et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids. Surg Today 2012; 42: 868-875
• 18 Huang H, Wen K, Ding X. et al. The efficiency and safety of modified tissue-selecting therapy stapler combined with complete anal canal epithelial preservation operation in circumferential mixed hemorrhoids: a randomized controlled trial. Langenbeck Arch Surg 2023; 408: 332
• 19 Ebigbo A, Nagl S, Scheppach MW. et al. Peroral submucosal endoscopic stricturotomy – a novel third-space approach for a complex anastomotic stricture. Endoscopy 2023; 55: E656