Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2811-4806
Indirect Evidence for the Volume–Outcome Relationship in Corrective Surgery for Hirschsprung Disease: Insights from Adult Colorectal Surgery
Authors
Abstract
Introduction
Hirschsprung disease (HD) is a rare malformation that requires complex corrective surgery. Low caseload, heterogeneous patient cohorts, and difficulties in linking long-term outcomes to the initial corrective surgery limit the available direct evidence for a volume-outcome relationship. Indirect evidence from adult colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery may be transferable, given the partial similarity of the procedures.
Methods
Using the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) V24–07 rapid report's methodology, this study evaluated the transferability of the volume–outcome relationship from adult CRC surgery to corrective surgery for HD in children. Differences between the two populations were identified and rated for their effect on the transferability of the volume–outcome relationship by an expert panel, following predefined IQWiG V24–07 categories.
Results
Consensus was reached for 6 out of 12 criteria. For “disease characteristics,” “comorbidities,” “intervention,” “follow-up,” and “concomitant treatments,” differences were deemed irrelevant to transferability. For “diagnosis,” differences were considered to increase procedural complexity in HD, thereby reinforcing the volume–outcome relationship. Tissue sampling and frozen-section pathology were identified as key challenges. Differences of opinion arose for the remaining criteria, particularly concerning whether the transferability of evidence is limited to rectal resections in adults or includes all colorectal resections. No consensus could be reached on the appropriate caseload threshold for corrective surgery for HD in children.
Conclusion
Using the IQWiG V24–07 framework, this study provides strong support for the transferability of the volume–outcome relationship from adult colorectal surgery to corrective surgery for HD. Despite population differences, the underlying mechanisms linking surgical complexity and institutional experience are comparable, reinforcing the relevance of volume-based quality control in pediatric surgery.
Keywords
volume–outcome relationship - Hirschsprung disease - indirect evidence - Caseload - centralization of carePublication History
Received: 31 October 2025
Accepted: 10 February 2026
Accepted Manuscript online:
17 February 2026
Article published online:
27 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 EUROCAT live birth 2012–2018. EU-RD Platform (EU Joint Research Centre). Accessed August 20, 2025, at: https://eu-rd-platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/eurocat/eurocat-data/prevalence_en
- 2 De La Torre L, Wehrli LA. Error traps and culture of safety in Hirschsprung disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 2019; 28 (03) 151-159
- 3 Solari V, Boemers T, Schmiedeke E. et al. Volume-outcome relationship in corrective surgery for Hirschsprung's disease: a systematic literature review of direct evidence and an overview of indirect evidence. Pediatr Surg Int 2025; 41 (01) 221
- 4 Apfeld JC, Wood RJ, Halleran DR, Deans KJ, Minneci PC, Cooper JN. Relationships between hospital and surgeon operative volumes and surgical outcomes in Hirschsprung's disease. J Surg Res 2021; 257: 379-388
- 5 Söderström L, Graneli C, Rossi D. et al. National centralization of Hirschsprung's disease in Sweden: a comparison of postoperative outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 2024; 40 (01) 265
- 6 Wilms M, Mãrzheuser S, Jenetzky E, Busse R, Nimptsch U. Treatment of Hirschsprung's disease in Germany: analysis of National Hospital Discharge data from 2016 to 2022. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (10) 161574
- 7 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64 (12) 1303-1310
- 8 European Reference Network. Methodological Handbooks & Toolkit for Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Decision Support Tools for Rare or Low-Prevalence and Complex Diseases. Published online September 28, 2020. . Accessed September 21, 2025, at: https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/9d7de9a7-de0d-49b5-a297-5a0303e3059b_en?filename=ern_cpg-cdst_hb4_en.pdf
- 9 Pai M, Iorio A, Meerpohl J. et al. Developing methodology for the creation of clinical practice guidelines for rare diseases: a report from RARE-Bestpractices. Rare Dis 2015; 3 (01) e1058463
- 10 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF), ed. S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, Langversion 3.01. Published online 2025. Accessed September 22, 2025, at: https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/kolorektales-karzinom/
- 11 [V24–02] Zusammenhang zwischen Leistungsmenge und Qualität des Behandlungsergebnisses bei der Chirurgie der Kolon- und der Rektumkarzinome - Aktualisierung zum Auftrag V22–02
- 12 Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jørgensen P, Iversen LH. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012 (03) CD005391
- 13 Kyrklund K, Sloots CEJ, de Blaauw I. et al. ERNICA guidelines for the management of rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020; 15 (01) 164
- 14 [V24–07] Wissenschaftliche Ausarbeitung zur methodischen Bewertung eines Zusammenhangs zwischen Leistungsmenge und Qualität des Behandlungsergebnisses bei seltenen Erkrankungen mit geringer Fallzahl. Accessed September 22, 2025
- 15 Rossi D, Löf Granström A, Teunissen NM, Wijnen RMH, Wester T, Sloots CEJ. Bridging the gap: a systematic review on reporting baseline characteristics, process, and outcome parameters in rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2024; 34 (02) 189-198
- 16 Rath A, Salamon V, Peixoto S. et al. A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: what are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome?. Trials 2017; 18 (01) 556
- 17 Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Low DE. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16 (05) 1055-1063
- 18 Wang Q, Mine S, Nasu M, Fukunaga T, Nojiri S, Zhang CD. Association of hospital volume and long-term survival after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2023; 10: 1161938
- 19 Smits FJ, Henry AC, van Eijck CH. et al; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Care after pancreatic resection according to an algorithm for early detection and minimally invasive management of pancreatic fistula versus current practice (PORSCH-trial): design and rationale of a nationwide stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial. Trials 2020; 21 (01) 389
