Synlett 2008(18): 2856-2858  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1083545
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Exploring Substrate Scope of Shi-Type Epoxidations

Natalia Nietoa, Ian J. Munslowa, Héctor Fernández-Péreza, Anton Vidal-Ferran*a,b
a Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ), Avgda. Països Catalans 16, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
Fax: +34(977)920228; e-Mail: avidal@iciq.es;
b Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
Further Information

Publication History

Received 21 July 2008
Publication Date:
15 October 2008 (online)

Abstract

Enantioselective epoxidations of alkenes (12 examples) were achieved using a Shi-type carbohydrate-derived hydrate and Oxone. The chiral platform provided by the catalyst tolerates a wide range of substituents providing high yields and enantioselectivities (80-95.5% ee). However, styrene derivatives were only converted with poor selectivities (11-26% ee).

    References and Notes

  • 1a Katsuki T. In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis   Vol. 2:  Jacobsen EN. Pfaltz A. Yamamoto H. Springer; Heidelberg: 1999.  p.621-648  
  • 1b Jacobsen EN. Wu MH. In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis   Vol. 2:  Jacobsen EN. Pfaltz A. Yamamoto H. Springer; Heidelberg: 1999.  p.649-677  
  • 1c Johnson RA. Sharpless KB. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis   2nd ed.:  Ojima I. Wiley-VCH; New York: 2000.  p.231-285  
  • 1d Katsuki T. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis   2nd ed.:  Ojima I. Wiley-VCH; New York: 2000.  p.287-325  
  • 2 Aziridines and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis   Yudin AK. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006. 
  • See, for example:
  • 3a Pericàs MA. Puigjaner C. Riera A. Vidal-Ferran A. Gómez M. Jimenez F. Muller G. Rocamora M. Chem. Eur. J.  2002,  8:  4164 
  • 3b Popa D. Puigjaner C. Gómez M. Benet-Buchholz J. Vidal-Ferran A. Pericàs MA. Adv. Synth. Catal.  2007,  349:  2265 ; and references cited therein
  • For leading references on this transformation, see:
  • 4a Frohn M. Shi Y. Synthesis  2000,  1979 
  • 4b Shi Y. Acc. Chem. Res.  2004,  37:  488 
  • 4c Hickey M. Goeddel D. Crane Z. Shi Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.  2004,  101:  5794 
  • 4d Yang D. Acc. Chem. Res.  2004,  37:  497 
  • 4e Xia QH. Ge HQ. Ye CP. Liu ZM. Su KX. Chem. Rev.  2005,  105:  1603 
  • 5 Wang Z.-X. Tu Y. Frohn M. Zhang J.-R. Shi Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1997,  119:  11224 ; and references cited therein
  • 6 Wu XY. She X. Shi Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  8792 
  • 7 Nieto N. Molas P. Benet-Buchholz J. Vidal-Ferran A.
    J. Org. Chem.  2005,  70:  10143 
  • 9 Singleton DA. Wang Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2005,  127:  6679 
  • 10 Nieto N. Munslow IJ. Barr J. Benet-Buchholz J. Vidal-Ferran A. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2008,  6:  2276 
  • 13 Higher pH values were not considered since the background reaction could be significant. See: Kurihara M. Ito S. Tsutsumi N. Miyata N. Tetrahedron Lett.  1994,  35:  1577 
  • 14 Roberts SM. Poignant G. Catalysis for Fine Chemical Synthesis: Hydrolysis, Oxidation and Reduction   1st ed.:  John Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 2002.  p.94-98  
  • 15 Wang Z.-X. Tu Y. Frohn M. Zhang J.-R. Shi Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1997,  119:  11224 
  • 16 Katsuki T. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.  1996,  113:  87 
  • 17 Archelas A. Furstoss R. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  6112 
  • 18 Wang Z.-X. Shi Y. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  3099 
  • 19 Brandes BD. Jacobsen EN. J. Org. Chem.  1994,  59:  4378 
  • 20 Wang Z.-X. Shi Y. J. Org. Chem.  1997,  62:  8622 
  • 21 Kin Tse M. Bhor S. Klawonn M. Anilkumar G. Jiao H. Döbler C. Spannenberg A. Mägerlein W. Hugl H. Beller M. Chem. Eur. J.  2006,  12:  1855 
8

Diacetate 2 is a very effective as epoxidation catalyst using 10 mol% of catalyst loading. Loading for Shi’s catalysts usually ranges from 20 mol% to 30 mol%. See refs. 4a-c.

11

Compound 4e (0.37 g, 46% yield) was obtained as a colourless oil. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.27-7.40 (m, 15 H), 6.48 (dt, 1 H, J = 16.0, 1.3 Hz), 6.28 (dt, 1 H, J = 16.0, 6.9 Hz), 5.42 (s, 1 H), 3.62 (t, 2 H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.60 (qd, 2 H, J = 6.9, 1.3 Hz). ¹³C NMR: δ = 142.4, 137.7, 131.6, 128.5, 128.4, 127.4, 127.3, 127.2, 127.0, 126.0, 83.7, 68.7, 33.6.
The asymmetric epoxidation of alkene 4e to give (+)-5e was carried out by the general procedure (see ref. 12).
Compound 5e (0.15 g, 52% yield); white solid; mp 56 ˚C; [α]D ²5 +28.53 (c 0.12, CH2Cl2). IR: 2871-3066, 1599, 1491, 1097, 1037, 855 cm. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.12-7.36 (m, 15 H), 5.36 (s, 1 H), 3.69 (d, 1 H, J = 1.9 Hz), 3.65 (t, 2 H, J = 6.0 Hz), 3.13 (td, J = 5.6, 1.9 Hz), 2.02 (td, 2 H, J = 5.6, 6.0 Hz). ¹³C NMR: δ = 142.3, 142.3, 137.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 127.6, 127.6, 127.3, 127.1, 127.0, 125.7, 84.0, 65.7, 61.1, 58.8, 33.1. HRMS: m/z calcd for C23H22O2Na: 353.1517; found: 353.1520. Enantiomeric excess was determined by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase (Chiracel OD-H column), eluent: hexane-i-PrOH (95:5); flow: 0.8 mL/min; l = 216 nm; t R (major) = 10.8 min; t R (minor) = 11.7 min.

12

General Procedure for the Epoxidation of Alkenes: The corresponding alkene (2.22 mmol) and the required amount of catalyst 3 (10-30 mol%) were dissolved in MeCN-dimethoxymethane (44 mL, 1:2). A pH 6 buffer solution (8 mL), tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (35 mg, 0.10 mmol) was slowly added with stirring and the mixture was cooled to the desired temperature. The flask was equipped with two syringe pumps; one of them was filled with a solution of Oxone (3.62-6.82 mmol) in pH 6 buffer (14 mL) and the other one with a solution of K2CO3 (5.33-16.06 mmol) in H2O (14 mL). The two solutions were added dropwise over a 2 h period (syringe pump). The solution was stirred at 0 ˚C for the corresponding reaction time. The mixture was diluted with H2O (40 mL) and extracted with the appropriate organic solvent [5a and 5h: hexane (4 × 40 mL); 5b-g,i-l: CH2Cl2 (4 × 40 mL)]. The combined organic fractions were collected and washed with brine (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvents were removed under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by flash chromatography on SiO2˙Et3N (2.5%). Enantioselec-tivity was determined by chiral chromatography and the configuration of epoxides was established by comparison with either reported elution order or optical rotation if reported data was available. For 5a, HPLC; Chiralpak AD.¹4 For 5b,¹5 5j,¹6 and 5k,¹7 GC: gamma dex. For 5c ¹8 and 5h,¹9 HPLC; Chiralcel OD. For 5d, HPLC; Chiralcel OD-H.²0 For 5f,²¹ HPLC: Chiralcel AD-H. For 5l GC: gamma dex.