RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000152.xml
Evidence-Based Spine Surgery 2009; 5(3): 3-14
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1100875
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1100875
Clinical topic
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Degenerative spondylolisthesis
Instrumented or noninstrumented lumbar fusion?Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
30. Dezember 2009 (online)

Summary
It is not clear whether instrumentation or non-instrumented lumbar fusion is better for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis based on evidence from four randomized controlled trials. Fusion rates appear to be higher in patients treated with instrumentation, but complications and reoperation rates also tended to be higher in this group. Statistical significance was not consistent across studies, and results did not clearly favor one treatment over the other. To better understand the benefits of instrumented lumbar fusion versus noninstrumented fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis, larger methodologically rigorous trials are needed.