Impact of Graft Size and Commissural Resuspension Height on Aortic Valve Competence in Valve-Sparing Aortic Replacement under Physiological Pressures[*]

Abstract

Background: Valve competence in valve-sparing aortic root replacement has been described as being influenced by commissural height as well as graft size. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a gradual reduction of commissural height and graft diameter on aortic insufficiency under physiological conditions in an in vitro model. Methods: Porcine aortic valves were reimplanted into a tubular graft and a native commissural height was obtained. Subsequently the height was reduced by 10 % and 20 %, respectively. To investigate the impact of graft size, a 30 % reduction of the prosthesis diameter was carried out in valves with both native and reduced commissural heights. All conditions were investigated under pulsatile flow simulation and static pressure exposure. Results: Reduction of commissural height caused regurgitation at both 10 % and 20 % lower heights, which was more pronounced in grafts with 20 % reduction. Graft undersizing resulted in significant reflux, with regurgitation even occurring with valves in a native commissural position. Conclusions: Valve competence is impaired both by the reduction of commissural height and by reduced graft size. In particular, reimplantation of aortic valves into undersized grafts promotes valve insufficiency even if commissural height is well adjusted.

Key words

thoracic surgery - heart valve surgery - aortic disease

1 Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Stuttgart, Germany, February 15–18, 2009.

References

• 1 David A, Feindel C M. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  103 617-622
• 2 Babin-Ebell J, De Vivo F, Vogt P R, Roth P. Impact of graft-sizing and resuspension level of the commissures on aortic insufficiency in reimplantation technique of the aortic valve.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon. 2007;  55 351-354
• 3 Barratt-Boyes B G. A method for preparing and inserting a homograft aortic valve.  Brit J Surg. 1965;  52 847-856
• 4 Scharfschwerdt M, Misfeld M, Sievers H H. The influence of a nonlinear resistance element upon in vitro aortic pressure tracings and aortic valve motions.  ASAIO J. 2004;  50 498-502
• 5 Svensson L G. Sizing for modified Davids reimplantation procedure.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  76 1751-1753
• 6 David T E. Sizing and tailoring the Dacron graft for reimplantation of the aortic valve.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  130 243-244
• 7 Gleason T G. New graft formulation and modification of the David reimplantation technique.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  130 601-603
• 8 Morishita K, Abe T, Fukada J, Sato H, Shiiku C. A surgical method for selecting appropriate size of graft in aortic root remodelling.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 1795-1796
• 9 Pepper J, Yacoub M. Valve conserving operation for aortic regurgitation.  J Card Surg. 1997;  12 (Suppl. 2) 151-156
• 10 Pethig K, Milz A, Hagl C, Harringer W, Haverich A. Aortic valve reimplantation in ascending aortic aneurysm: risk factors for early valve failure.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  73 29-33

1 Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Stuttgart, Germany, February 15–18, 2009.