Laparoscopy for Suspected Appendicitis in Children: May a Macroscopically Normal Appendix be Left In Situ?

Abstract

Background/Purpose: An appendix which appears macroscopically normal is found in 10%–20% of laparoscopic explorations for suspected appendicitis. The appropriate surgical strategy for these cases is a matter of debate. We analysed a consecutive series of children in whom an inconspicuous appendix was left in situ.

Material and Methods: Laparoscopic exploration was performed in 188 consecutive children with suspected appendicitis and an expected need for immediate operation from 2002 to 2006. Our concept included laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with macroscopic signs of inflammation. Normal appearing appendices were left in situ. All patients with a remaining appendix underwent follow-up. Major endpoints were defined as postoperative complications, re-operations for abdominal symptoms, hospital admissions and consultations with medical doctors during the follow-up period. In addition, other symptoms and well-being were assessed.

Results: The appendix appeared macroscopically normal in 21 (11%) of the 188 patients (mean age 11.7 years (±4.2); 11 f, 10 m), and was therefore left in situ. The immediate postoperative course was uneventful in all patients with a mean hospital stay of 2.7 (±1.2) days. During the follow-up period (mean of 25 (±17) months), 18 patients (86%) did not or only rarely (≤ 2 times) consult a medical doctor for abdominal symptoms. Three patients (14%) reported more than 2 consultations. No patient was readmitted to hospital or operated for acute appendicitis. At the last follow-up, 20 patients (95%) were entirely symptom-free. One patient complained about persisting right lower quadrant pain, but refused further diagnostic procedures or interventions.

Conclusion: According to our results, a macroscopically inconspicuous appendix may be left in situ in patients undergoing laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. However, this conclusion is based on a small number of patients and larger series are mandatory.

Key words

child - laparoscopy - appendicitis

References

• 1 Beltrán MA, Almonacid J, Vicencio A, Gutiérrez J, Cruces KS, Cumsille MA. Predictive value of white blood cell count and C-reactive protein in children with appendicitis.  J Ped Surg. 2007;  42 ((7)) 1208-1214
• 2 Bijnen CL, Broek WT van den, Bijnen AB, Ruiter P de, Gouma DJ. Implications for removing a normal appendix.  Digest Surg. 2003;  20 115-119
• 3 Blab E, Kohlhuber U, Tillawi S, Schweitzer M, Stangl G, Ogris E, Rokitansky A. Advancements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children and adolescents.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004;  14 ((6)) 404-409
• 4 Carr NJ. The pathology of acute appendicitis.  Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000;  4 ((1)) 46-58
• 5 Champault G, Taffinder N, Ziol M, Rizk N, Catheline JM. Recognition of a pathological appendix during laparoscopy: a prospective study of 81 cases.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 ((5)) 671
• 6 Chang FC, Hogle HH, Welling DR. The fate of the negative appendix.  Am J Surg. 1973;  126 752-754
• 7 Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Decanini L, Balestri R, Lorenzetti L, Franceschi M, Cavina E. What you see is not what you get: A plea to remove a normal appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy.  Acta Chir Belg. 2001;  101 243-245
• 8 Davies DA, Yanchar NL. Appendicitis in the obese child.  J Ped Surg. 2007;  42 ((5)) 857-861
• 9 Deutsch AA, Shani N, Reiss R. Are some appendicectomies unnecessary? An analysis of 319 white appendices.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1983;  28 35-40
• 10 Ekeh AP, Wozniak CJ, Monson B, Crawford J, MacCarthy MC. Laparoscopy in the contemporary management of acute appendicitis.  Am J Surg. 2007;  193 ((3)) 310-313 , discussion 313–314
• 11 Garbarino S, Shimi SM. Routine diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unnecessary appendicetomies in young women.  Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar 26;  , (Epub ahead of print)
• 12 Gracey D, MacClure MJ. The impact of ultrasound in suspected acute appendicitis.  Clin Radiol. 2007;  62 ((6)) 573-578
• 13 Humes DJ, Simpson J. Acute appendicitis.  British Medical Journal. 2006;  333 530-534
• 14 Jerman RP. Removal of the normal appendix: the cause of serious complications.  Br J Clin Pract. 1969;  23 466-467
• 15 Jones PF. Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 1570-1577
• 16 Kaiser S, Mesas-Burgos C, Södermann E, Frencker B. Appendicitis in children – impact of US and CT on the negative appendectomy rate.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004;  14 ((4)) 260-264
• 17 Korlacki W, Dzielicki J. Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and complicated appendicitis in children – safe or risky procedure.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;  18 ((1)) 29-32
• 18 Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R, Yang Q. Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 625-633
• 19 Lavonius MI, Liesjärvis S, Ovaska J, Pajulo O, Riskari S, Alanen M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a prospective randomised study.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;  11 ((4)) 235-238
• 20 Mattei P. Minimally invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treat-ment of abdominal pain in children.  Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;  19 338-343
• 21 Metzelder ML, Kübler J, Petersen C, Glüer S, Nustede R, Ure BM. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in children: a prospective study on Ligasure versus clip/ligation.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006;  16 ((4)) 241-244
• 22 Metzelder ML, Jesch N, Dick A, Kübler J, Petersen C, Ure BM. Impact of prior surgery on the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for children: a prospective study.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 1733-1737
• 23 Morrow SE, Newman KD. Current management of appendicitis.  Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007;  16 34-40
• 24 Navez B, Therasse A. Should every patient undergoing laparoscopy for clinical diagnosis of appendicitis have an appendectomy?.  Acta Chir Belg. 2003;  103 87-89
• 25 Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A. The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements September 1994. The Educational Committee of the Euro-pean Association for Endoscopic Surgery.  Surg Endosc. 1995;  9 ((5)) 550-563
• 26 Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy.  Endoscopy. 1983;  15 ((2)) 59-64
• 27 Teh SH, O’Ceallaigh S, MacKeon JG, O’Donohoe MK, Tanner WA, Keane FB. Should an appendix that looks “normal” be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain?.  Eur J Surg. 2000;  166 388-389
• 28 Ure BM, Bax NM, Zee DC van der. Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery.  J Pediatr Surg. 2000;  35 1170-1173
• 29 Broek WT van den, Bijnen AB, Ruiter P de, Gouma DJ. A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 251-254
• 30 Vlodrop V Van, Pattyn P, Ceelen W. Management of the “normal” appendix during surgery for right fossa syndrome: proposed clinical algorithm.  Acta Chir Belg. 2007;  107 8-11
• 31 Wang LT, Prentiss KA, Simon JZ, Doody DP, Ryan DP. The use of white blood cell count and left shift in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.  Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007;  23 ((2)) 69-76

Correspondence