Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1241871
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Pediatric Surgical Technique: Laparoscopic or Open Approach? A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Publication History
received December 24, 2008
accepted after revision September 06, 2009
Publication Date:
30 October 2009 (online)

Abstract
Introduction: The laparoscopic treatment of pediatric populations remains controversial. This review was conducted to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for a variety of surgical indications in pediatric populations.
Method/Design: A computerized comprehensive search supplemented by a manual review of the literature was performed for all peer-reviewed publications comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy, fundoplication and hernia repair cohorts. Outcomes of interest were length of stay (LOS), operating room (OR) time, complication rates and total hospital costs; aggregation of outcome rates was performed with the Mantel-Haenszel method.
Results: A total of 24 articles were identified that met the search and inclusion criteria. LOS was found to be significantly reduced in favor of the laparoscopic approach, with a weighted mean difference of −1.44 days, although the OR time was significantly increased, with a weighted mean difference of +12.8 min. Laparoscopic intervention was associated with a significantly reduced complication rate compared to the open approach (10.6 vs. 15.6%). Total hospital costs of the laparoscopic approaches were found to be insignificantly increased compared to the open techniques.
Conclusion: This review further supports the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric populations, demonstrating that the three types laparoscopic procedures reviewed resulted in better patient outcomes compared to open procedures, in the form of reduced LOS and overall complication rates. Increased utilization of this approach may prove beneficial to pediatric patients.
Key words
pediatric surgery - evidence-based medicine - laparoscopic surgery - open surgery - meta-analysis
References
- 1
Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP. et al .
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: A meta-analysis.
Ann Surg.
2006;
243
17-27
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Bozkurt P, Kaya G, Altinas F. et al .
Systemic stress response during operations for acute abdominal pain performed via
laparoscopy or laparotomy in children.
Anaesthesia.
2000;
55
5-9
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Chan KL, Hui WC, Tam PKH.
Prospective, randomized, single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs.
open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia.
Surg Endosc.
2005;
19
927-932
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Dronov AF, Kotlobovskii, Poddubnyi IV.
Laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients: experience of 2 300 operations.
Khirurgiia (Mosk).
2000;
6
30-36
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Eldridge B, Kimber C, Wolfe R. et al .
Uptime as a measure of recovery in children postappendectomy.
J Pediatr Surg.
2003;
38
1822-1825
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Firilas AM, Jackson RJ, Smith SD.
Minimally invasive surgery: The pediatric surgery experience.
J Am Coll Surg.
1998;
186
542-544
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Gans SL, Berci G.
Advances in endoscopy of infants and children.
J Pediatr Surg.
1971;
6
199-233
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Georgeson KE, Owings E.
Advances in minimally invasive surgery in children.
Am J Surg.
2000;
180
362-364
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Gilchrist BF, Lobe TE, Schropp KP. et al .
Is there a role for laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric surgery?.
J Pediatr Surg.
1992;
27
209-212
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Grosfeld JL.
Current concepts in inguinal hernia in infants and children.
World J Surg.
1989;
13
506-515
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Hay SA.
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in children.
Pediatr Surg Int.
1998;
13
21-23
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Iglesias JL, Meier DE, Thompson WR.
Cost analysis of laparoscopic and open fundoplication in children.
Pediatr Endosurg Innov Techn.
1997;
1
15-21
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Iwanaka T, Arai M, Ito M. et al .
Laparoscopic surgery in neonates and infants weighing less than 5 kg.
Pediatr Int.
2000;
42
608-612
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Kapur P, Caty MG, Glick PL.
Pediatric hernias and hydroceles.
Pediatr Clin North Am.
1998;
45
773-789
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Koivusalo AI, Korpela R, Wirtavuori K. et al .
A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair
in children.
Pediatrics.
2009;
123
332-337
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Kotlobovsky VI, Dronov AF, Poddubnyi IV. et al .
Comparative study of surgical and endosurgical treatment of generalized appendicular
peritonitis in children.
Khirurgiia (Mosk).
2003;
7
32-37
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Lavonius MI, Liesjarvi S, Ovaska J. et al .
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: A prospective randomised study.
Eur J Pediatr Surg.
2001;
11
235-238
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Leape LL, Ramenofsky ML.
Laparoscopy in Children.
Pediatrics.
1980;
66
215-220
MissingFormLabel
- 19
LeBlanc KA, Booth WV.
Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene:
Preliminary findings.
Surg Laparosc Endosc.
1993;
3
39-41
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Lee KH, Yeung CK.
Laparoscopic surgery in newborns and infants: An update.
HK J Paediatr.
2003;
8
327-335
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Lejus C, Delile L, Plattner V. et al .
Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children:
Effects on postoperative analgesia.
Anesthesiology.
1996;
84
801-806
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Li P, Xu Q, Ji Z. et al .
Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children.
J Pediatr Surg.
2005;
40
1279-1283
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K. et al .
The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2004;
158
34-37
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Little DC, Custer MD, May BH. et al .
Laparoscopic appendectomy: An unnecessary and expensive procedure in children?.
J Pediatr Surg.
2002;
37
310-317
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Mattioli G, Repetto P, Carlini C. et al .
Laparoscopic vs open approach for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children.
Surg Endosc.
2002;
16
750-752
MissingFormLabel
- 26
McHoney M, Eaton S, Wade A. et al .
Inflammatory response in children after laparoscopic vs open Nissen fundoplication:
Randomized controlled trial.
J Pediatr Surg.
2005;
40
908-914
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Newman K, Ponsky T, Kittle K. et al .
Appendicitis 2000: Variability in practice, outcomes, and resource utilization at
thirty pediatric hospitals.
J Pediatr Surg.
2003;
38
372-379
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG. et al .
Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children.
Surg Endosc.
2004;
18
242-245
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Padankatti LR, Pramod RK, Gupta A. et al .
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: A prospective
study.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg.
2008;
13
104-106
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Paya K, Fakhari M, Rauhofer U. et al .
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A comparison of complications.
JSLS.
2000;
4
121-124
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Rogers DA, Hatley RM, Howell CG.
A prospective, randomized comparison of traditional and laparoscopic inguinal exploration
in children.
Am Surg.
1998;
64
119-121
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Saranga Bharathi R, Arora M, Baskaran V.
Pediatric inguinal hernia: laparoscopic versus open surgery.
JSLS.
2008;
12
277-281
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM. et al .
eds.
Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence
Report/Technology Assement No. 43 (Prepared By the University Of California At San
Francisco-Stanford Evidence-based Practice Center under contract No. 290-97-0013),
AHRQ Publication NO. 01-E058, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcase Research and Quality.
July 2001.
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Simon P, Burkhardt U, Sack U. et al .
Inflammatory response is no different in children randomized to laparoscopic or open
appendectomy. .
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech.
2008;
19
71-76
MissingFormLabel
- 35
West S, King V, Carey TS. et al .
Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47 (prepared by the Research Triangle Institute-University
of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0011).
AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
2002;
MissingFormLabel
Correspondence
Mathew James Billingham
George Eliot Hospital Medicine and Surgery
College Street
Nuneaton Warwickshire CV10 7DJ
United Kingdom
Phone: +44 7708 572668
Fax: +44 2476 865175
Email: mbillingham@doctors.org.uk