PDF herunterladen
Endoscopy 2010; 42(4): 292-299
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244074
Original article
 
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study

G.  Fernández-Esparrach1 , O.  Sendino1 , M.  Solé2 , M.  Pellisé1 , L.  Colomo2 , A.  Pardo1 , G.  Martínez-Pallí3 , L.  Argüello4 , J.  M. Bordas1 , J.  Llach1 , A.  Ginès1
  • 1Endoscopy Unit, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
  • 2Pathology Department, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
  • 3Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
  • 4Gastroenterology Department, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 15 April 2009

accepted after revision 25 January 2010

Publikationsdatum:
30. März 2010 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Siehe auch:

Commentaire de travail de G. Fernández-Esparrach et al., pp. 292Endoscopy 2010; 42(04): 349-349
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291848

Background and aim: The diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. The specific diagnosis of GIST has to be based on immunocytochemistry. This study aimed to prospectively compare in a crossover manner the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) in the specific diagnosis of gastric GISTs. We hypothesized that EUS-TCB is superior to EUS-FNA in this respect.

Patients and methods: Forty patients with gastric subepithelial tumors suspected on the basis of EUS of being a GIST underwent both EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB. The sequence in which the techniques were employed was randomly assigned to avoid bias.

Results: Forty tumors were sampled (mean number of passes: 2.1 ± 0.9 with EUS-TNB and 1.9 ± 0.8 with EUS-FNA; P = not significant, NS). Final diagnoses were: GIST (n = 27), carcinoma (n = 2), leiomyoma (n = 1), schwannoma (n = 1), and no diagnosis possible (n = 9). Device failure occurred in 6 patients with EUS-TCB. A cytohistological diagnosis of mesenchymal tumor (n = 29) and carcinoma (n = 2) was made in 70 % of cases by EUS-FNA and in 60 % of cases by EUS-TCB (P = NS). Among the samples that were adequate, immunohistochemistry could be performed in 74 % of EUS-FNA samples and in 91 % of EUS-TCB samples (P = 0.025). When inadequate samples were included, the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was 52 % and that of EUS-TCB was 55 % (P = NS). There were no complications.

Conclusions: EUS-TCB is not superior to EUS-FNA in GISTs because of the high rate of technical failure of trucut. However, when an adequate sample is obtained with EUS-TCB, immunohistochemical phenotyping is almost always possible. EUS-TCB can be safely performed in this set of patients.

References

  • 1 Dougherty M J, Compton C, Talbert M, Wood W C. Sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Separation into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups by mitotic count.  Ann Surg. 1991;  214 569-574
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recent advances in understanding of their biology.  Hum Pathol. 1999;  30 1213-1220
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hedenbro J L, Ekelund M, Wetterberg P. Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy.  Surg Endosc. 1991;  5 20-23
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Rösch T. Endoscopic ultrasonography: state of the art 1995, part 1.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;  5 475-691
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Caletti G, Devière J, Fockens P. et al . Guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): endoscopic ultrasonography, part 1: technique and upper gastrointestinal tract.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 474-479
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Van Dam J, Brady P G, Freeman M. et al . Guidelines for training in electronic ultrasound: guidelines for clinical application. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 829-833
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nesje L B, Laerum O D, Svanes K, Odegaard S. Subepithelial masses of the gastrointestinal tract evaluated by endoscopic ultrasonography.  Eur J Ultrasound. 2002;  15 45-54
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rösch T, Kapfer B, Will U. et al . Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective multicenter study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  7 856-862
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y. et al . The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Gu M, Ghafari S, Nguyen P T, Lin F. Cytologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cytomorphologic and immunohistochemical study of 12 cases.  Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;  25 343-350
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Rader A E, Avery A, Wait C L. et al . Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using morphology, immunocytochemistry, and mutational analysis of c-kit.  Cancer. 2001;  93 269-275
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Miettinen M, Blay J Y, Sobin L H. Mesenchymal tumours of the stomach. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon; IARC Press 2000
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Fletcher C D, Berman J J, Corless C. et al . Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach.  Hum Pathol. 2002;  33 459-465
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Levy M J, Jondal M L, Clain J, Wiersema M J. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 101-106
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ginès A, Wiersema M J, Clain J E. et al . Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 597-601
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Larghi A, Verna E C, Stavropoulos S N. et al . EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study.  Gastrointest. 2004;  59 185-190
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N. et al . Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 397-401
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A. et al . Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing trucut and 19-gauge aspiration needles.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 362-366
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wahnschaffe U, Ullrich R, Mayerle J. et al . EUS-guided-trucut needle biopsies as first-line diagnostic method for patients with intestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23 2351-2355
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Thomas T, Kaye P V, Ragunath K, Aithal G. Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;  104 584-590
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Skov B G, Georgescu C V. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patiens: a prospective study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;  42 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R. et al . Advantage of EUS trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 505-511
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Polkowski M, Gerke W, Jarosz D. et al . Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic-ultrasound guided trucut biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 329-334
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hwang J A, Rulyak S D, Kimmey M B. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 2217-2228
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Pellisé M, Castells A, Ginès A. et al . Clinical usefulness of KRAS mutational analysis in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by means of endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  17 1299-1307
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Fletcher C D, Berman J J, Corless C. et al . Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach.  Hum Pathol. 2002;  33 459-465
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema M J, Clain J E. et al . Impact of lymph node staging on therapy of esophageal cancer.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 1626-1635
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Chang K J. State of the art lecture: endoscopic ulñtrasonography (EUS) and FNA in pancreatico-biliary tumors.  Endosocpy. 2006;  38 (Suppl. 1) 556-560
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Wallace M B, Pascual J M, Raimondo M. et al . Minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer.  JAMA. 2008;  299 540-546
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Vilmann P, Hancke S. A new biopsy handle instrument for endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 238-242
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Scarpa M, Bertin M, Ruffolo C. et al . A systematic review on the clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.  J Surg Oncol. 2008;  98 384-392
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 DeWitt J, McGreevy K, LeBlanc J. et al . EUS-guided Trucut biopsy of suspected nonfocal chronic pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 76-84
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Levy M J, Reddy R P, Wiersema M J. et al . EUS-guided Trucut biopsy in establishing autoimmune pancreatits as the cause of obstructive jaundice.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 467-472
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Wiersema M J, Levy M J, Harewood G C. et al . Initial experience with EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies of perigastric organs.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 275-278
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Levy M J, Wiersema M J. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 417-426
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Storch I, Shah M, Thurer R. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: when tissue is the issue.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 86-90
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Okubo K, Yamao K, Nakamura T. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach.  J Gastroenterol. 2004;  39 747-753
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Vander Noot III M R, Eloubeidi M A, Chen V K. et al . Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.  Cancer. 2004;  102 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Matsui N. et al . Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.  World J Gastroenterol. 2007;  13 2077-2082
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Sepe P S, Moparty B, Pitman M B. et al . EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 254-261
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Hoda K M, Rodríguez S A, Faigel D O. EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 1218-1223
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Ribeiro A, Vernon S, Quintela P. EUS-guided trucut biopsy with immunohistochemical analysis of a gastric stromal tumor.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 645-648
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Matsui M, Goto H, Niwa Y. et al . Preliminary results of fine aspiration biopsy histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumours.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 750-755
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Chak A. EUS in submucosal tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 S43-S48
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Greenson J K. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors and other mesenchymal lesions of the gut.  Mod Pathol. 2003;  16 366-375
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Baly J Y, Bonvalot S, Casali P. et al. on behalf of the GIST consensus meeting panelists . Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Report of the GIST consensus conference of 20 – 21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO.  Ann Oncol. 2005;  16 566-578
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros S N. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study.  Cytopathology. 2006;  17 27-33
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar

À. GinèsMD, PhD 

Endoscopy Unit
Institut de Malalties Digestives
Hospital Clínic

Villarroel 170
08036 Barcelona
Spain

Fax: Fax:+34-93-2279387

eMail: magines@clinic.ub.es