Endoskopie heute 2010; 23(1): 24-33
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247296
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Technische Aspekte bei der endoskopischen Submukosa-Dissektion (ESD)

Technical Aspects at the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)J. Hochberger1 , S. Dammer1 , D. Menke1 , E. Kruse1 , P. Köhler2 , K.-F. Bürrig3
  • 1Med. Klinik III – Gastroenterologie, St. Bernward-Krankenhaus, Hildesheim
  • 2Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Bundesforschungsinstitut für Tiergesundheit, Institut für Nutztiergenetik, Mariensee
  • 3Institut für Pathologie, Hildesheim
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
12. März 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In den vergangenen Jahren hat die endoskopische Submukosa-Dissektion auch in Europa als neues Verfahren der „En-bloc“-Resektion flächiger Lä­sionen im Gastrointestinaltrakt sich an verschiedenen Zentren etablieren können. Leider existieren bisher keine wirklichen Standards in Bezug auf Instrumente und Geräteeinstellungen. In diesem Artikel geben wir hierzu eine kurze Übersicht und eigene Erfahrungen der letzten Jahre weiter.

Abstract

Within the last years endoscopic submucosal ­dissection (ESD) has established its role for the “en bloc” resection of even large mucosal precancerous or early cancerous lesions. However, there is little literature concerning devices and settings used for successful ESD. In the following article we give an overview on technical requirements and report on our own ­experiences over the last years.

Literatur

  • 1 Jeong G, Lee J H, Yu M K et al. Non-surgical management of microperforation induced by EMR of the stomach.  Dig Liver Dis. 2006;  38 605-608
  • 2 Kakushima N, Yahagi N, Fujishiro M et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for tumors of the esophagogastric junction.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 170-174
  • 3 Min B H, Chang D K, Kim D U et al. Low frequency of bacteremia after an endoscopic resection for large colorectal tumors in spite of extensive submucosal exposure.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 105-110
  • 4 Riphaus A, Wehrmann T, Weber B et al. [S 3-guidelines – sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy].  Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 1298-1330
  • 5 Tanabe S, Koizumi W, Higuchi K et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy for superficial esophageal cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 814-820
  • 6 Rampado S, Bocus P, Battaglia G et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: accuracy in staging superficial carcinomas of the esophagus.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;  85 251-256
  • 7 Waxman I. EUS and EMR / ESD: is EUS in patients with Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma necessary prior to endoscopic mucosal resection?.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 Suppl 1 2-4
  • 8 Akashi K, Yanai H, Nishikawa J et al. Ulcerous change decreases the ­accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis for the invasive depth of early gastric cancer.  Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2006;  37 133-138
  • 9 Larghi A, Lightdale C J, Memeo L et al. EUS followed by EMR for staging of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 16-23
  • 10 Hurlstone D P, Sanders D S, Cross S S et al. A prospective analysis of ex­tend­ed endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal villous adenomas: an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery.  Colorectal Dis. 2005;  7 339-344
  • 11 Hochberger J, Kruse E, Buerrig K F et al. Endoskopische Submukosa-Dissektion (ESD) im Ösophagus.  Endoskopie heute. 2010;  23 2-8
  • 12 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M et al. Successful outcomes of a novel endoscopic treatment for GI tumors: endoscopic submucosal dissection with a mixture of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, glyc­erin, and sugar.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 243-249
  • 13 Sakai Y, Eto R, Kasanuki J et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid in the diagnosis of gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 635-641
  • 14 Sohn D K, Chang H J, Choi H S et al. Does hyaluronic acid stimulate tumor growth after endoscopic mucosal resection?.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  23 1204-1207
  • 15 Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S et al. The acetic acid + indigocarmine method in the delineation of gastric cancer.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  23 1358-1361
  • 16 Lee S H, Cho W Y, Kim H J et al. A new method of EMR: submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 220-224
  • 17 Yamamoto H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early cancers and large flat adenomas.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 74-76
  • 18 Yamasaki M, Kume K, Kanda K et al. A new method of endoscopic submucosal dissection using submucosal injection of jelly.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1156-1157
  • 19 Yamasaki M, Kume K, Yoshikawa I et al. A novel method of endoscopic submucosal dissection with blunt abrasion by submucosal injection of sodium carboxymethylcellulose: an animal preliminary study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 958-965
  • 20 Sato T. A novel method of endoscopic mucosal resection assisted by submucosal injection of autologous blood (blood patch EMR).  Dis ­Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 1636-1641
  • 21 Hurlstone D P, Fu K I, Brown S R et al. EMR using dextrose solution versus sodium hyaluronate for colorectal Paris type I and 0–II lesions: a randomized endoscopist-blinded study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 110-114
  • 22 Neuhaus H, Wirths K, Schenk M et al. Randomized controlled study of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection with a water-jet ­hybrid-knife of esophageal lesions in a porcine model.  Gastrointest ­Endosc. 2009;  70 112-120
  • 23 Yahagi N, Neuhaus H, Schumacher B et al. Comparison of standard ­endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: an animal study.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 340-345
  • 24 Kähler G F, Sold M G, Fischer K et al. Selective fluid cushion in the submucosal layer by water jet: advantage for endoscopic mucosal resection.  Eur Surg Res. 2007;  39 93-97
  • 25 Kahler G F, Sold M S, Post S et al. Selective Tissue Elevation by Pressure Injection (STEP) Facilitates Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR).  Surg Technol Int. 2007;  16 107-112
  • 26 Lingenfelder T, Fischer K, Sold M G et al. Combination of water-jet dis­section and needle-knife as a hybrid knife simplifies endoscopic sub­mucosal dissection.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23 1531-1535
  • 27 Toyanaga T, Man I M, Ivanov D et al. The results and limitations of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.  Acta Chir Iugosl. 2008;  55 17-23
  • 28 Hochberger J, Dammer S, Kruse E et al. Endoskopische Submukosa-Dissektion – Technische Voraussetzungen.  Verdauungskrankheiten. 2009;  27 260-268
  • 29 Hochberger J, Lamade W, Matthes K et al. Wer macht in Zukunft NOTES? Gastroenterologe, Chirurg, endoskopischer Interventionalist?.  Endoskopie heute. 2008;  21 217-221
  • 30 Hochberger J, Lamade W, Matthes K et al. Transluminale Interventionen („NOTES“) – Aktueller Stand.  Deutsch Med Wschr. 2009;  134 467-472
  • 31 Hochberger J, Maiss J, Matthes K et al. Training and Education in Endoscopy. In: Classen M, Tytgat GNJ, Lightdale C, eds. Gastrointestinal Endos­copy. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2009

Prof. Dr. J. Hochberger

Med. Klinik III · Schwerpunkt Allg. Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Interventionelle Endoskopie · St. Bernward Krankenhaus, Akad. Lehrkrankenhaus der Univ. Göttingen

Treibestr. 9

31134 Hildesheim

Telefon: 0 51 21 / 90 12 41

Telefon: direkt: 0 51 21 / 90 52 40 (z. B. ab 16:00)

Fax: 0 51 21 / 90 12 42

eMail: prof.dr.j.hochberger@bernward-khs.de

eMail: juehochber@mac.com (privat)