Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Defects of the Head and Neck

ABSTRACT

Patients afflicted with head and neck cancer, traumatic injuries to the head and neck, or those with congenital or developmental defects benefit from multidisciplinary team management. The head and neck region participates in complex physiologic processes that can often be impeded by these circumstances. Evaluation of the patient by the maxillofacial prosthodontist can assist the other members of the team in providing treatment planning options for the patients. Intraoral defects arising from these circumstances can be treated with prosthodontics that serve to assist with speech, swallowing, and to some degree mastication. If chemotherapeutic or radiation modalities are also used to treat the head and neck, assessment of the patient by the maxillofacial prosthodontist may prove to identify factors that may predispose to undesirable sequelae. Preventive treatment by elective tooth extraction, prosthodontic assessment, and patient education prove to assist in predictable management of these oftentimes complex presenting conditions. Facial defects arising from similar circumstances can be an alternative or adjunct to plastic surgical reconstruction and offer the added advantage of tumor surveillance in susceptible patients.

KEYWORDS

Maxillofacial prosthetics - maxillofacial prosthodontist - tumor ablative surgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Galler C, Epstein J B, Guze K A, Buckles D, Stevenson-Moore P. The development of osteoradionecrosis from sites of periodontal disease activity: report of 3 cases.  J Periodontol. 1992;  63 310-316
• 2 Beumer J, Harrison R, Sanders B, Kurrasch M. Osteoradionecrosis: predisposing factors and outcomes of therapy.  Head Neck Surg. 1984;  6 819-827
• 3 Beumer III J, Harrison R, Sanders B, Kurrasch M. Preradiation dental extractions and the incidence of bone necrosis.  Head Neck Surg. 1983;  5 514-521
• 4 Marx R E. A new concept in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983;  41 351-357
• 5 Marx R E. Osteoradionecrosis: a new concept of its pathophysiology.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983;  41 283-288
• 6 Hastreiter R J. Is 0.4% stannous fluoride gel an effective agent for the prevention of oral diseases?.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;  118 205-208
• 7 Miller J T, Shannon I L. A clinical report. Water-free stannous-fluoride gel and post-irradiation caries.  J Public Health Dent. 1972;  32 127
• 8 Zlotolow I M. Clinical manifestations of head and neck irradiation.  Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997;  18(2 Spec No) 51-56
• 9 Logemann J A. Swallowing disorders.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;  21 563-573
• 10 Martin-Harris B, Logemann J A, McMahon S, Schleicher M, Sandidge J. Clinical utility of the modified barium swallow.  Dysphagia. 2000;  15 136-141
• 11 Hidalgo D A. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  84 71-79
• 12 Okay D J, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects.  J Prosthet Dent. 2001;  86 352-363
• 13 Genden E M, Okay D, Stepp M T et al.. Comparison of functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with and without palatomaxillary reconstruction: a preliminary report.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  129 775-780
• 14 Peng X, Mao C, Yu G Y, Guo C B, Huang M X, Zhang Y. Maxillary reconstruction with the free fibula flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  115 1562-1569
• 15 Oh H K, Chambers M S, Martin J W, Lim H J, Park H J. Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible: treatment outcomes and factors influencing the progress of osteoradionecrosis.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;  67 1378-1386
• 16 Marciani R D, Ownby H E. Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;  44 218-223
• 17 Melo M D, Obeid G. Osteonecrosis of the jaws in patients with a history of receiving bisphosphonate therapy: strategies for prevention and early recognition.  J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;  136 1675-1681
• 18 Shifman A, Finkelstein Y, Nachmani A, Ophir D. Speech-aid prostheses for neurogenic velopharyngeal incompetence.  J Prosthet Dent. 2000;  83 99-106
• 19 Yoshida H, Michi K, Yamashita Y, Ohno K. A comparison of surgical and prosthetic treatment for speech disorders attributable to surgically acquired soft palate defects.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;  51 361-365
• 20 Logemann J A, Pauloski B R, Rademaker A W et al.. Speech and swallow function after tonsil/base of tongue resection with primary closure.  J Speech Hear Res. 1993;  36 918-926
• 21 de Carvalho-Teles V, Sennes L U, Gielow I. Speech evaluation after palatal augmentation in patients undergoing glossectomy.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;  134 1066-1070
• 22 Marunick M, Tselios N. The efficacy of palatal augmentation prostheses for speech and swallowing in patients undergoing glossectomy: a review of the literature.  J Prosthet Dent. 2004;  91 67-74
• 23 Eriksson E, Brånemark P I. Osseointegration from the perspective of the plastic surgeon.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93 626-637
• 24 Nishimura R D, Roumanas E, Sugai T, Moy P K. Auricular prostheses and osseointegrated implants: UCLA experience.  J Prosthet Dent. 1995;  73 553-558
• 25 Toljanic J A, Eckert S E, Roumanas E et al.. Osseointegrated craniofacial implants in the rehabilitation of orbital defects: an update of a retrospective experience in the United States.  J Prosthet Dent. 2005;  94 177-182