Empathy: Perhaps the Most Important E in EBP

ABSTRACT

Treatment of stuttering has recently been influenced by calls for evidence-based practice. Unfortunately, most of the existing treatment “evidence” in stuttering focuses on the surface behaviors of the disorder. Although these behaviors are an important part of the problem of stuttering, they may not be the most critical factor to the person who stutters. This article discusses loss of control as the critical factor in stuttering and examines historical and practical reasons why this part of the disorder has been largely ignored in research about stuttering and stuttering treatment. Suggestions for viewing stuttering from the perspective of the client and the importance of taking this perspective are provided.

KEYWORDS

Empathy - evidence-based practice - stuttering treatment - loss of control

REFERENCES

• 1 Davidow J H, Bothe A K, Bramlett R E. The Stuttering Treatment Research Evaluation and Assessment Tool (STREAT): evaluating treatment research as part of evidence-based practice.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;  15(2) 126-141
• 2 Prins D, Ingham R J. Evidence-based treatment and stuttering—historical perspective.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;  52(1) 254-263
• 3 Zipoli Jr R P, Kennedy M. Evidence-based practice among speech-language pathologists: attitudes, utilization, and barriers.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2005;  14(3) 208-220
• 4 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Evidence-based practice (EBP). Available at: http://www.asha.org/members/ebp Accessed April 26, 2010
• 5 Sackett D L, Rosenberg W MC, Gray J A, Haynes R B, Richardson W S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.  BMJ. 1996;  312(7023) 71-72
• 6 Yaruss J S, Quesal R W. Research based stuttering therapy revisited.  Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders. 2002;  12 22-24
• 7 Ingham J C. Evidence-based treatment of stuttering: I. Definition and application.  J Fluency Disord. 2003;  28 197-206 quiz 206-207
• 8 Cooper E B. Chronic perseverative stuttering syndrome: a harmful or helpful construct?.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1993;  2 11-15
• 9 Manning W. How can you understand? You don't stutter!.  Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. 2004;  31 58-68
• 10 Perkins W H. What is stuttering?.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;  55(3) 370-382 discussion 394-397
• 11 Quesal R W. Stuttering research: have we forgotten the stutterer?.  J Fluency Disord. 1989;  14 153-164
• 12 Random House Dictionary of the English Language (RHDEL) .2nd ed. Unabridged. New York, NY; Random House 1987
• 13 Urban Dictionary. Available at: http://www.urbandictionary.com Accessed April 21, 2010
• 14 Wingate M E. A standard definition of stuttering.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1964;  29 484-489
• 15 Woolf G. A definition in search of data and a theory (A comment on Wingate's “Standard Definition of Stuttering”).  J Speech Hear Disord. 1965;  30 199-200
• 16 Wingate M E. A reply.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1965;  30 200-202
• 17 Wingate M E. A rational management of stuttering. In: Peins M Contemporary Approaches to Stuttering Therapy. Boston, MA; Little, Brown and Company 1984: 271-298
• 18 Wingate M E. Physiological and genetic factors. In: Shames GH, Rubin H Stuttering Then and Now. Columbus, OH; Charles E. Merrill 1986: 49-69
• 19 Wingate M E. Foundations of Stuttering. San Diego, CA; Academic Press 2002
• 20 Moore S E, Perkins W H. Validity and reliability of judgments of authentic and simulated stuttering.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;  55(3) 383-391 discussion 394-397
• 21 Perkins W H. The problem of definition: commentary on stuttering.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1983;  48 226-246
• 22 Perkins W H. Stuttering as a categorical event: barking up the wrong tree–a reply to Wingate.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1984;  49 431-433
• 23 Bloodstein O. On pluttering, skivering, and floggering: a commentary.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;  55(3) 392-393 discussion 402-404
• 24 Ingham R J. Commentary on Perkins (1990) and Moore and Perkins (1990): On the valid role of reliability in identifying “What is stuttering?”.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;  55 394-397
• 25 Smith A. Toward a comprehensive theory of stuttering: a commentary.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;  55(3) 398-401 discussion 402-404
• 26 Yairi E, Seery C H. Stuttering: Foundations and Clinical Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ; Pearson Higher Education 2011
• 27 Baer D. If you know why you're changing a behavior, you'll know when you've changed it enough.  Behav Assess. 1988;  10 219-223
• 28 Baer D. The critical issue in treatment efficacy is knowing why treatment was applied: a student's response to Roger Ingham. In Olswang LB, Thompson CK, Warren S, Minghetti NJ Treatment Efficacy Research in Communication Disorders. Rockville, MD; American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation 1990: 31-39
• 29 Yaruss J S, Quesal R W, Reeves L et al.. Speech treatment and support group experiences of people who participate in the National Stuttering Association.  J Fluency Disord. 2002;  27(2) 115-133 quiz 133-134
• 30 Van Riper C. The Treatment of Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice-Hall 1973
• 31 Sheehan J. Stuttering: Research and Therapy. New York, NY; Harper & Row 1970
• 32 Williams D E. A point of view about stuttering.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1957;  22(3) 390-397
• 33 Johnson W. Stuttering and What You Can Do about It. Minneapolis, MN; University of Minnesota Press 1961
• 34 St. Louis K O. Living with Stuttering: Stories, Basics, Resources, and Hope. Morgantown, WV; Populore 2001
• 35 Plexico L, Manning W H, Dilollo A. A phenomenological understanding of successful stuttering management.  J Fluency Disord. 2005;  30(1) 1-22
• 36 Starkweather C W. Fluency and Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice-Hall 1987
• 37 Quesal B, Murphy B. The stuttering curriculum in the new millennium: building “skills” into “knowledge” classes.  Perspectives in Fluency and Fluency Disorders. 2008;  18 33-36
• 38 Craig A. Relapse following treatment for stuttering: a critical review and correlative data.  J Fluency Disord. 1998;  23 1-30
• 39 Hancock K, Craig A. Predictors of stuttering relapse one year following treatment for children aged 9 to 14 years.  J Fluency Disord. 1998;  23 31-48