RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273317
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Relevance and Methods of Interventional Breast Sonography in Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Staging
Bedeutung und Technik der präoperativen interventionellen Abklärung des Lymphknotenstatus bei Patientinnen mit primärem MammakarzinomPublikationsverlauf
received: 29.7.2010
accepted: 1.3.2011
Publikationsdatum:
26. Mai 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Die Reduktion der therapieinduzierten Morbidität ist ein wichtiges Ziel für die Verbesserung der Behandlungsqualität beim Mammakarzinom. Die Einführung der Sentinellymphknotenbiopsie (SLNB) hat dazu beigetragen, die operationsbedingte Morbidität im Schulter-Arm-Bereich erheblich zu reduzieren. Allerdings gilt der klinisch positive Nodalstatus nach wie vor als eine Kontraindikation für die SLNB. Die aktuelle Datenlage macht aber deutlich, dass die klinische und auch sonografische Dignitätseinschätzung zur Evaluation nicht ausreichend ist, um den Nodalstatus mit der notwendigen Genauigkeit zu erfassen. Die alleinige klinische und/oder bildgebende Beurteilung des axillären Lymphknotenstatus würde zu einer Übertherapie von 40 % der Patientinnen führen. Um die Rate an unnötigen Axilladissektionen (AD) zu reduzieren, ist eine prätherapeutische interventionelle Abklärung notwendig, die genauere Information über den feingeweblichen Zustand des Lymphknotens liefert. Im Vergleich der aktuell verfügbaren Methoden erweist sich die Feinnadelaspiration (FNA) in Bezug auf den Kosten-, Zeitaufwand, Praktikabilität, Komplikationsrate als das beste Abklärungsverfahren, ist jedoch in Bezug auf die Sensitivität der sonografisch gesteuerten Stanzbiopsie unterlegen. Ein negatives Ergebnis der FNA erfordert daher eine weitere Abklärung, die gegebenenfalls durch die CNB vorgenommen werden kann. Bei einer Spezifität von nahezu 100 % kann bei einem positiven Ergebnis der FNA die Indikation zur kompletten Axilladissektion gestellt werden.
Abstract
Reduction of therapy-induced morbidity is an important goal for the improvement of the quality of breast cancer treatment. The introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) significantly contributed to the reduction of surgery-induced morbidity in the shoulder-arm region. However, a clinically positive nodal status is still considered a contra-indication for SLNB. The current data constellation clearly shows that the clinical and also the sonographic malignancy assessment is insufficient for the accurate identification of the nodal status. A merely clinical and/or image-based appraisal of the axillary lymph node status would lead to overtreatment due to unnecessary axillary dissection in approximately 40 % of patients. In order to reduce the rate of unnecessary axillary dissection (AD), pretreatment interventional clarification is necessary to provide more detailed information about the histological condition of the lymph node. Comparing the currently available methods, fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the best in terms of cost and time requirement, practicability and complication rate. However, considering the sensitivity, it is inferior to ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB). Thus, a negative FNA outcome requires further clarification, which possibly can be performed with CNB. With a specificity of nearly 100 % and therefore a low rate of false positive cases for FNA, complete AD can be indicated by a positive FNA result. In the context of the interventional procedure, it must be stressed that FNA requires a high level of expertise on the part of both the examiner and the cytologist. The prerequisite for optimal interventional diagnostics of lymph nodes is an adequate sonographic assessment on the basis of standardized sonomorphological criteria.
Key words
axillary ultrasound - fine needle aspiration - core needle biopsy - axilary dissection - sentinel lymph node biopsy
References
- 1
Carter C L, Allen C, Henson D E.
Relation of tumor size, lymph node status and survival in 24 740 breast cancer cases.
Cancer.
1989;
63
181-187
MissingFormLabel
- 2 Kreienberg R. Interdiszilinäre S 3-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. . Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (Hrsg) Zuckerschwerdt-Verlag; 2008
MissingFormLabel
- 3 http://www.ago-online.org
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Kühn T, Vogl F D, Helms G et al.
Sentinel Node-Biopsy is a reliable method for axillary staging in breast cancer: results
from a large prospective German multi-institutional trail.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
2004;
30
252-259
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Zavagno G, Carcoforo P, Franchini Z et al.
Axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary dissection:
a study on 479 breast cancer patients.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
2005;
31
715-720
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Kühn T, Bembenek A, Decker T et al.
A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients
with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance.
Cancer.
2005;
103
451-461
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al.
A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in
breast cancer.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
349
546-553
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Helms G, Kühn T, Moser L et al.
Shoulder-arm morbidity in patients with sentinel node biopsy and complete axillary
dissection – data from a prospective randomized trail.
Eur J Surg Oncolo.
2009;
35
696-701
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Cutler S J, Axtell L M, Schottenfeld D et al.
Clinical assessment of lymph nodes in carcinoma of the breast.
Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1970;
131
41-52
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Fisher B, Wolmark N, Banes M.
The accuracy of clinical nodal staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant
of histologic nodal status in carcinoma of the breast.
Gynecol Obstet.
1981;
152
765-772
MissingFormLabel
- 11
De Freitas R, Costa M V, Schneider S V et al.
Accuracy of ultrasound and clinical examination in the diagnosis of axillary lymph
node metastases in breast cancer.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
1991;
17
240-244
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Vaidya J S, Vyas J J, Thakur M H et al.
Role of ultrasound to detect axillary node involvement in operable breast cancer.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
1996;
22
140-143
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Specht M C, Fey J V, Borgen P I et al.
Is the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel
lymph node biopsy?.
J Am Coll Surg.
2005;
200
11-14
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Rijk M C, Deurloo E E, Nieweg O E et al.
Ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients
unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2006;
13
31-35
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Abe van H, Schmidt R A, Kulkarni K et al.
Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: Sampling with US-guided
14-gauge core-needle biopsy- clinical experience in 100 patients.
Radiology.
2009;
250
1
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Yuen S, Sawai K, Ushijima Y et al.
Evaluation of axillary status in breast cancer. CT – based determination of sentinel
lymph node size.
Acta Radiol.
2002;
43
579-586
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Yamagami T, Yuen S, Sawai K et al.
MR imaging-guided axillary node biopsy for breast cancer: initial findings.
Eur Radiol.
2004;
14
151-156
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Wahl R L, Siegel B A, Coleman R E et al.
PET Study Group. Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron
emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET
study group.
J Clin Oncol.
2004;
22
227-285
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Pamilo M, Sovia M, Lavast E M.
Real time ultrasound, axillary mammography, and clinical examination in the detection
of axillray lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
J Ultrasound Med.
1989;
8
115-120
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Chae B J, Bae J S, Kang B J et al.
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the detection of axillay lymph
node metastasis in patients with early stage breast cancer.
Jpn J Clin Oncol.
2009;
39
284-289
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Ahn J H, Son E J, Kim J A et al.
The role of ultrasonography and FPG-PET in axillary lymph node staging of breast cancer.
Acta Radiol.
2010;
51
859-865
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Madjar H, Ohlinger R, Mundinger A et al.
BIRADS-Analogue Degum Criteria for Findings in Breast Ultrasound – Consensus of the
DEGUM Committee on Breast Ultrasound.
Ultraschall in Med.
2006;
27
374-379
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Tateishi T, Machi J, Feleppa E J et al.
In vitro B-mode ultrasound criteria for diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis
for breast cancer.
J Ultrasound Med.
1999;
18
349-359
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Bedi D G, Krishnamurthy R, Krishnamurthy S et al.
Cortical Morphologic Features of Axillary Lymph Nodes as a Predictor of Metastasis
in Breast Cancer: In Vitro Sonograpgic Study.
AJR.
2008;
191
646-652
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Koehler K E, Ohlinger R.
Sensitivity and Specificity of Preoperative Ultrasound for Diagnosing Nodal Metastases
in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Ultraschall in Med.
2010;
DOI: DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245505
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Yang W T, Chang J, Metreweli C.
Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features
of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.
Radiology.
2000;
215
568-573
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Coi Y J, Ko E Y, Han B K et al.
High- resolution ultrasonographic features of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients
with breast cancer.
Breast.
2009;
18
119-22
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Steppan I, Reimer D, Müller-Holzner E et al.
Breast cancer in women: evaluation of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes with
contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Ultraschall in Med.
2010;
31
63-67
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Bailek E J, Jakubowski W, Szczepanik A B et al.
3D Ultrasound Examination of the Superficial Lymph Nodes – Does it Provide Additional
Information?.
Ultraschall in Med.
2006;
27
467-472
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Botar-Jid C, Fodor D, Dudea S M et al.
Sonoelastography of superficial lymph node enlargement: benign vs. malignant.
Ultraschall in Med.
2008;
29:
OP_15_5
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Steppan I, Reimer D, Müller-Holzner E et al.
Breast cancer in women: evaluation of benign and malignant axillary lamph nodes with
contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Ultraschall in Med.
2010;
31
63-67
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Nori J, Vanzi E, Bazzocchi M et al.
Role of axillary ultrasound examination in the selection of breast cancer patients
for sentinel node biopsy.
Am J Surg.
2007;
193
16-20
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Podkrajsek M, Music M M, Kadivec M et al.
Role of ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer.
Eur Radiol.
2005;
15
1044-1050
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Deurloo E E, Tanis P J, Gilhuijs K G et al.
Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography
of the axilla in breast cancer.
Eur J Cancer.
2003;
39
1068-1073
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Damera A, Evans A J, Cornford E J et al.
Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary
operable breast cancer.
Br J Cancer.
2003;
89
1310-1313
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Rajesh Y S, Ellenbogen S, Banerjee B.
Preoperative axillary ultrasound scan: its accuracy in assessing the axillary nodal
status in carcinoma breast.
Breast.
2002;
11
49-52
MissingFormLabel
- 37
Hahn M, Kagan K O, Siegmann K C et al.
Mammotome versus ATEC: a comparison of two breast vacuum biopsy techniques under sonographic
guidance.
Arch Gynecol Obstet.
2009;
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Hahn M, Okamgba S, Scheler P et al.
Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a comparison of 11-gauge and 8-gauge needles in benign
breast disease.
World J Surg Oncol.
2008;
6
51
MissingFormLabel
- 39
Berg W A, Campassi C I, Ioffe O B.
Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation.
Radiology.
2003;
227
183-191
MissingFormLabel
- 40
Venta L A, Kim J P, Pelloski C E et al.
Management of complex breast cysts.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
173
1331-1336
MissingFormLabel
- 41 Albert U S. Stufe-3-Leitlinien. Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Senologie e.V, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. (Hrsg), Zuckerschwerdt-Verlag; 2008
MissingFormLabel
- 42
Kishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi D G et al.
Role of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary
lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.
Cancer.
2002;
95
982-988
MissingFormLabel
- 43
Hanley Z, Birdsong G, Cohen C et al.
Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human
epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast carcinomas.
Cancer Cytopathol.
2009;
117
279-288
MissingFormLabel
- 44
Rao R, Lilley L, Andrews V et al.
Axillary staging by percutaneous biopsy:sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration versus
core needle biopsy.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2009;
16
1342-1348
MissingFormLabel
- 45
Bedrosian I, Bedi D, Kuerer H M.
Impact of clinicopathological factors on sensitivity of axillary ultrasonography in
the detection of axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2003;
10
1025-1030
MissingFormLabel
- 46
Kuenen-Boumeester V, Menke-Pluymers M, Kanter A Y et al.
Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast
cancer patients. A preoperative procedure.
Eur J Cancer.
2003;
39
170-174
MissingFormLabel
- 47
Podkrajsek de M, Music M M, Kadivec M et al.
Role of ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer.
Eur Radiol.
2005;
15
1044-1050
MissingFormLabel
- 48
Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P et al.
Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in the breast
cancer: A systemic review.
Am J Roentgenol.
2006;
186
1342-1348
MissingFormLabel
- 49
Ciatto S, Brancato B, Risso G et al.
Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage
test in breast cancer staging.
Breast Cancer Res Treat.
2006;
MissingFormLabel
- 50
Somasundar P, Gass J, Steinhoff M et al.
Role of ultrasound-guided axillary fine-needle aspiration in the management of invasive
breast cancer.
Am J Surg.
2006;
192
458-461
MissingFormLabel
- 51
Altomare V, Guerriero G, Carino R et al.
Axillary lymph node echo-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology enables breast cancer
patients to avoid a sentinel lymph node biopsy. Preliminary experience and a review
of the literature.
Surg Today.
2007;
37
735-739
MissingFormLabel
- 52
Alkuwari E, Auger M.
Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer
patients.
ancer Cytopathology.
2008;
114
89-93
MissingFormLabel
- 53
Schiettecatte A, Bourgain C, Breucq C et al.
Initial axillary staging of breast cancer usinf ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration:
a liquid-based cytology study.
Cytopathology.
2011;
22
30-35
MissingFormLabel
- 54
Damera A, Evans A J, Cornford E J.
Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary
operable breast cancer.
Br J Cancer.
2003;
89
1310-1313
MissingFormLabel
- 55
Topal U, Punar S, Taşdelen I et al.
Role of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in the staging
of breast carcinoma.
Eur J Radiol.
2005;
56
382-385
MissingFormLabel
- 56
Garcia-Ortega M J, Benito M A, Vahamonde E F et al.
Pretreatment axillary ultrasonography and core biopsy in patients with suspect breast
cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and impact on management.
Eur J Radiol.
2010, Jan 2;
MissingFormLabel
- 57
Hinson J L, McGrath P, Moore A et al.
The critical role of axillary ultrasound and aspiration biopsy in the management of
breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2008;
15
250-255
MissingFormLabel
- 58
Bomeisl Jr P E, Alam S, Wakely Jr P E.
Interinstitutional consultation in fine-needle aspiration cytopathology: a study of
742 cases.
Cancer Cytopathol.
2009;
117
237-246
MissingFormLabel
- 59
He Q, Fan X, Yuan T et al.
Eleven years of experience reveals the fine-needle aspiration cytology is still a
useful method for preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Breast.
2007;
16
303-306
MissingFormLabel
Dr. Ines Gruber
Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tübingen
Calwerstraße 7
72076 Tübingen
Germany
Telefon: ++ 49/70 7œ 98 22 11
Fax: ++ 49/70 71/3 54 77
eMail: ines.gruber@med.uni-tuebingen.de