Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273319
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Reliabilität der Introitussonografie nach Einlage eines spannungsfreien Vaginalbands nach dem TVT-Verfahren
Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Introital Ultrasound after Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) ProcedurePublication History
eingereicht: 17.11.2010
angenommen: 15.3.2011
Publication Date:
25 May 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Wir untersuchten die Interrater- und Intrarater-Reliabilität der Introitussonografie bei Patientinnen nach TVT-Implantation. Material und Methoden: Bei 202 Patientinnen konnte die Position und Form des Bandes bestimmt werden. Die Bandposition wurde charakterisiert durch die Relation der Distanz zwischen Blasenausgang und Band zur Urethralänge (%) und durch den Abstand zwischen Band und Urethra (mm). Die Übereinstimmung wurde durch den Intra-Klassen-Korrelation (ICC) und Kappa-Koeffizient (KK) ermittelt. Ergebnisse: Für die Intrarater-Reliabilität konnte bei der Beurteilung der Bandposition (Ruhe ICC 0,90, Valsalva ICC 0,96) und des Abstands in Ruhe (ICC 0,83), aber nicht beim Pressen (ICC 0,74) eine gute Reproduzierbarkeit ermittelt werden. Bei der Bandform wurde eine Übereinstimmung von 81 % (Ruhe) und 79 % (Pressen) ermittelt. Der KK war mit 0,68 und 0,6 relativ gering. Die Interrater-Reliabilität war gut bei der Bestimmung der Bandposition (Ruhe ICC 0,93, Pressen ICC 0,89) und des Abstands (Ruhe ICC 0,89, Pressen ICC 0,87). Bei der Bandform zeigte sich eine geringe Übereinstimmung (Ruhe 71 %, Pressen 72 %). Schlussfolgerung: Die Introitussonografie in der midsagittalen Ebene zeigt eine gute Reproduzierbarkeit der sonografischen Bandcharakterisierung hinsichtlich Position und Abstand.
Abstract
Purpose: To date, the evaluation of TVT by ultrasound has not been standardized. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of introital ultrasound. Materials and Methods: Follow-up was performed for 202 patients after TVT procedure. The tape was characterized by the position in relation to urethral length (%) and the distance to the hypoechoic center of the urethra (mm). Furthermore, we assessed the shape of the tape (straight, curved or folded). All evaluations were performed by two experienced examiners (A, B) at rest and during Valsalva maneuver. All sonograms were archived digitally without measurement results. After 6 to 12 months, the sonograms were re-evaluated by one investigator (A). Depending on the first investigator, the results were compared as intraobserver (A-A) or interobserver (B-A) agreement. The first results were blinded for the second measurement. Agreement concerning the distances was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The concordance of the descriptive evaluation of the shape of the tape was characterized by the kappa coefficient (KC). Results: The tape was regularly identified as an echogenic structure dorsal to the urethra. The intraobserver reliability concerning the position of the tape in relation to urethral length showed good reproducibility (at rest ICC 0.90, Valsalva maneuver: ICC 0.96). For the distance between the tape and the urethra at rest (ICC 0.83), there was also good reproducibility, but not during Valsalva maneuver (ICC 0.74). The shape of the tape showed only moderate reproducibility with accordance of 81 % at rest (KC 0.68) and of 79 % during Valsalva maneuver (KC 0.6). The interobserver comparisons showed good concordance in measuring the POS at rest (ICC 0.93), and during Valsalva maneuver (ICC 0.89), and the DIS at rest (ICC 0.89), and during Valsalva maneuver (ICC 0.87). The congruence of the estimation of the shape was 71 % at rest (KC 0.44) and 72 % during Valsalva maneuver (KC 0.49). Conclusion: The characterization of the TVT in the sagittal view by introital ultrasound shows good reproducibility with respect to position and distance, but not shape.
Key words
bladder - urethra - ultrasound - surgery
Literatur
- 1
Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al.
An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary
incontinence.
Int Urogynecol J.
1996;
7
81-87
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Nilson C G, Palva K, Rezapour M et al.
Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for
treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Int Urogynecol J.
2008;
19
1043-1047
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Tunn R, Schaer G, Peschers U et al.
Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.
2005;
16
236-241
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Flock F, Kohorst F, Kreienberg R et al.
Ultrasound assessment of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT).
Ultraschall in Med.
(in press)
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M.
A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female
stress urinary incontinence.
Brit J Obstet Gynaecol.
1999;
106
345-350
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Hartnell G G, Kiely E A, Williams G et al.
Real-time ultrasound measurement of bladder volume: a comparative study of three methods.
Br J Radiol.
1987;
60
1063-1065
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Schaer G N, Schmid T, Peschers U et al.
Intraurethral ultrasound correlated with urethral histology.
Obstet Gynecol.
1998;
91
60-64
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Bland M JM, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet.
1986;
8 / 1
307-310
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Virtanen H S, Kiilholma P.
Urogynecologic ultrasound is a useful aid in the assessment of female stress urinary
incontinence – a prospective study with TVT procedure.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.
2002;
13
218-222
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Lo T S, Wang A C, Horng S G et al.
Ultrasonographic and urodynamic evaluation after tension free vagina tape procedure
(TVT).
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2001;
80
65-70
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Masata J, Martan A, Svabik K et al.
Ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract after successful tension-free vaginal
tape (TVT) procedure.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2006;
28
221-228
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Viereck V, Nebel M, Bader W et al.
Role of bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure in predicting outcome
of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2006;
28
214-220
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Harms L, Emons G, Bader W et al.
Funneling before and after anti-incontinence surgery – a prognostic indicator? Part
2: tension-free vaginal tape.
Int Urogynecol J.
2007;
18
289-294
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Schuettoff S, Beyersdorff D, Gauruder-Burmester A et al.
Visibility of the polypropylene tape after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure
in women with stress urinary incontinence: comparison of introital ultrasound and
magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and in vivo.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2006;
27
687-692
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Dietz H P, Mouritzen L, Ellis G et al.
Does the tension-free vaginal tape stay where you put it?.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
188
950-953
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Dietz H P, Wilson P D.
The „iris effect“: how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help us
understand anti-incontinence procedures.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2004;
23
267-271
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Dietz H P, Mouritsen L, Ellis G et al.
How important is TVT location?.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2004;
83
904-908
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D et al.
Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence
surgery.
Neurourol Urodyn.
2008;
27
485-490
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kolben S et al.
Tape functionality: position, change in shape, and outcome after TVT procedure – mid-term
results.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.
2010;
21
795-800
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Kociszewski J, Bagci S.
Sonography with regard to urethral length before and after placement of tension-free
vaginal tape.
Geburth Frauenheilk.
2003;
63
640-647
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Lo T S, Horng S G, Liang C G et al.
Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free
vaginal tape procedure.
Urology.
2004;
63
671-675
MissingFormLabel
Dr. Andreas Reich
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, Universität Ulm
Prittwitzstr. 43
89075 Ulm
Phone: ++ 49/7 31/50 05 85 01
Fax: ++ 49/7 31/5 00 5 85 02
Email: andreas.reich@uniklinik-ulm.de