Download PDF
Pneumologie 2011; 65(11): 647-652
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291395
Empfehlung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Empfehlung zur Sedierung in der flexiblen Bronchoskopie

Recommendations for Sedation During Flexible Bronchoscopy
H. Hautmann
1   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Pneumologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
,
R. Eberhardt
2   Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Thoraxklinik an der Universitätsklinik Heidelberg
,
R. Heine
3   Diakoniekrankenhaus Halle, Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Halle
,
F. Herth
2   Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Thoraxklinik an der Universitätsklinik Heidelberg
,
J. Hetzel
4   Abteilung für Onkologie, Hämatologie, Klinische Immunologie, Rheumatologie und Pulmologie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik Tübingen
,
M. Hetzel
5   Krankenhaus vom Roten Kreuz Bad Cannstatt GmbH, Klinik für Pneumologie, Beatmungsmedizin und Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Stuttgart
,
G. Reichle
6   Lungenklinik Hemer, Pneumologie, Schwerpunkt thorakale Endoskopie, Hemer
,
B. Schmidt
7   Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
,
F. Stanzel
6   Lungenklinik Hemer, Pneumologie, Schwerpunkt thorakale Endoskopie, Hemer
,
M. Wagner
8   Klinikum Nürnberg, Medizinische Klinik 3, Pneumologie, Allergologie, Schlafmedizin, Nürnberg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 November 2011 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die flexible Bronchoskopie ist heute eine Standarduntersuchung und wird nicht nur in fast allen Kliniken, sondern auch im niedergelassenen Bereich durchgeführt. Der überwiegende Teil der Patienten wünscht für diese Untersuchung eine Sedierung. Eine solche ist bei komplexen und interventionellen Eingriffen, unabhängig von dem Wunsch des Patienten, praktisch immer erforderlich. Die vorliegende Empfehlung zur Anwendung sedierender Maßnahmen in der flexiblen Bronchoskopie basiert auf den Ergebnissen zahlreicher klinischer Studien, berücksichtigt aber auch die individuellen Erfahrungen in diesem Bereich. Die Struktur- und Prozessvoraussetzungen sowie die Anforderungen an die Ausbildung des Personals werden definiert und sollen den Mindeststandard bei der Durchführung einer Bronchoskopie unter Sedierung beschreiben. Darüber hinaus werden die zur Sedierung empfohlenen Pharmaka diskutiert und deren Applikationsarten dargestellt. Schließlich beinhalten die Empfehlungen auch Vorschläge zur Aufklärung, Überwachung und Entlassung der Patienten. Sie sollen dem Untersucher konkrete Handlungsmöglichkeiten aufzeigen und damit vor allem die Patientensicherheit erhöhen.

Abstract

Flexible bronchoscopy is a standard examination today and is conducted not only in nearly every hospital but also in privately owned practices. The vast majority of patients want sedation for this examination. Such a procedure is nearly always necessary in complex and interventional procedures, irrespective of the patient’s wish. The recommendation at hand to use sedation measures for flexible bronchoscopy is based on the results of numerous clinical studies and also takes account of individual experiences in this area. The structural and procedural requirements and the requirements for staff training are defined and should describe the minimum standard when it comes to conducting a bronchoscopy under sedation. Furthermore the drugs recommended for sedation are discussed and their methods of application shown. Finally the recommendations also include suggestions for patient clarification, monitoring and discharge. They should provide the examiner with concrete operating options and therefore above all increase patient safety.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Putinati S, Ballerin L, Corbetta L et al. Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for bronchoscopy. Chest 1999; 115: 1437-1440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chhajed PN, Wallner J, Stolz D et al. Sedative drug requirements during flexible bronchoscopy. Respiration 2005; 72: 617-621
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Maguire GP, Rubinfeld AR, Trembath PW et al. Patients prefer sedation for fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Respirology 1998; 3: 81-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dang D, Robinson P, Winnicki S et al. The safety of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and proceduralist-administered sedation: a tertiary referral centre experience. Intern Med J 2010; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 British Thoracic Society guidelines on diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Thorax 2001; 56 (Suppl. 01) i1-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Haussinger K, Ballin A, Becker HD et al. [Recommendations for quality standards in bronchoscopy]. Pneumologie 2004; 58: 344-356
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wood-Baker R, Burdon J, McGregor A et al. Fibre-optic bronchoscopy in adults: a position paper of The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J 2001; 31: 479-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 ÄZQ. Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin. Programm für Nationale Versorgungsleitlinien, Methoden-Report. 2010 4. Auflage, erhältlich unter: http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/methodik
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mak PH, Campbell RC, Irwin MG. The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 633-640
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vargo JJ, Holub JL, Faigel DO et al. Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2006; 24: 955-963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Muravchick S. The elderly outpatient: current anesthetic implications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2002; 15: 621-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Muravchick S. The effects of aging on anesthetic pharmacology. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1998; 49: 79-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Colt HG, Morris JF. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy without premedication. A retrospective study. Chest 1990; 98: 1327-1330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rieger H-J. Rechtzeitigkeit der Patientenaufklaerung bei ambulanten Operationen‚ Urteil des BGH vom 14.6.1994. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1995; 120: 151-152
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Parzeller M, Wenk M, Zedler B et al. Aufklaerung und Einwilligung bei aerztlichen Eingriffen. Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104: A-576
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hazinski MF, Nolan JP, Billi JE et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010; 122: S250-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ellett ML. A literature review of the safety and efficacy of using propofol for sedation in endoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs 2010; 33: 111-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yoon HI, Kim JH, Lee JH et al. Comparison of propofol and the combination of propofol and alfentanil during bronchoscopy: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 104-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tramer MR, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Propofol and bradycardia: causation, frequency and severity. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 642-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Douglas RJ, Cadogan M. Cardiac arrhythmia during propofol sedation. Emerg Med Australas 2008; 20: 437-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Akyuz U, Pata C, Senkal V et al. Is propofol sedation with midazolam induction safe during endoscopic procedures without anesthesiologist?. Hepatogastroenterology 2010; 57: 685-687
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1229-1237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bosslet GT, Devito ML, Lahm T et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation: feasibility and safety in bronchoscopy. Respiration 2010; 79: 315-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J et al. Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 664-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J et al. Conscious sedation with propofol in elderly patients: a prospective evaluation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 1493-1501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Clark G, Licker M, Younossian AB et al. Titrated sedation with propofol or midazolam for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised trial. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 1277-1283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Stolz D, Kurer G, Meyer A et al. Propofol versus combined sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 1024-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dreher M, Ekkernkamp E, Storre JH et al. Sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in patients with pre-existing respiratory failure: Midazolam versus Midazolam plus Alfentanil. Respiration 2010; 79: 307-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schlatter L, Pflimlin E, Fehrke B et al. Propofol versus Propofol plus Hydrocodone for flexible bronchoscopy - a randomized study. The European respiratory journal: official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology 2011; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Greig JH, Cooper SM, Kasimbazi HJ et al. Sedation for fibre optic bronchoscopy. Respir Med 1995; 89: 53-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Papagiannis A, Smith AP. Fentanyl versus midazolam as premedication for fibre optic bronchoscopy. Respir Med 1994; 88: 797-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Houghton CM, Raghuram A, Sullivan PJ et al. Pre-medication for bronchoscopy: a randomised double blind trial comparing alfentanil with midazolam. Respir Med 2004; 98: 1102-1107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Green SM, Li J. Ketamine in adults: what emergency physicians need to know about patient selection and emergence reactions. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7: 278-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Macken E, Gevers AM, Hendrickx A et al. Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 57-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Malik JA, Gupta D, Agarwal AN et al. Anticholinergic premedication for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of atropine and glycopyrrolate. Chest 2009; 136: 347-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Clarkson K, Power CK, O'Connell F et al. A comparative evaluation of propofol and midazolam as sedative agents in fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1993; 104: 1029-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Crawford M, Pollock J, Anderson K et al. Comparison of midazolam with propofol for sedation in outpatient bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 419-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Morley AP, Nalla BP, Vamadevan S et al. The influence of duration of fluid abstinence on hypotension during propofol induction. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1373-1377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ozturk T, Cakan A, Gulerce G et al. Sedation for fiberoptic bronchoscopy: fewer adverse cardiovascular effects with propofol than with midazolam. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2004; 39: 597-602
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bulach R, Myles PS, Russnak M. Double-blind randomized controlled trial to determine extent of amnesia with midazolam given immediately before general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 300-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Pond WW, Hartman M. Ventilatory depression and midazolam. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Thomson JS, Donald C, Lewin K. Use of Flumazenil in benzodiazepine overdose. Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Nordt SP, Clark RF. Midazolam: a review of therapeutic uses and toxicity. J Emerg Med 1997; 15: 357-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Reves JG, Fragen RJ, Vinik HR et al. Midazolam: pharmacology and uses. Anesthesiology 1985; 62: 310-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Forth WH-D, Rummel W. Allgemeine und spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie. München: Urban & Fischer Verlag/Elsevier GmbH; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Silvestri GA, Vincent BD, Wahidi MM et al. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study to assess the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium injection for moderate sedation in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. Chest 2009; 135: 41-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Seifert H, Schmitt TH, Gultekin T et al. Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1207-1214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesthesia and analgesia 1970; 49: 924-934
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. Journal of clinical anesthesia 1995; 7: 89-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar