Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22(03): 238-242
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1308707
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Radiological Versus Clinical Evidence of Malrotation, a Tortuous Tale—10-Year Review

Linda Ruth Stephens
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Children's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
Veronica Donoghue
2   Department of Radiology, Children's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
John Gillick
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Children's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 November 2011

22 November 2011

Publication Date:
08 May 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Malrotation is a common abnormality, often diagnosed in the neonatal period. Symptoms may be nonspecific and clinical signs of volvulus are often only seen in the late stages when there has been significant ischemic insult to the bowel. The gold standard diagnostic investigation is the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast study. This study was designed to assess the incidence of negative laparotomy in patients with malrotation diagnosed on UGI contrast study and to identify the clinical signs and symptoms at presentation.

Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent laparotomy for malrotation, over a 10-year period (2001 to 2010) was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients <16 years of age with a diagnosis of malrotation on preoperative UGI contrast study.

Results A total of 72 patients were reviewed. UGI contrast study diagnosed 43(60%) cases of malrotation without volvulus, and 29(40%) cases of malrotation with volvulus. Laparotomy revealed that 39(54.2%) patients had malrotation without volvulus, 27(37.5%) had malrotation with volvulus, and 6(8.3%) had no evidence of malrotation. A total of 13(18%) patients had an incorrect diagnosis on UGI contrast study; 6(8.3%) had normal anatomy, 3(4.2%) diagnosed with malrotation without volvulus, had volvulus at laparotomy, and 4(5.5%) diagnosed with malrotation and volvulus had no volvulus at laparotomy.

Conclusion UGI contrast study can occasionally be misleading. In the above study, we have shown that there is a significant rate of negative laparotomy following diagnosis of malrotation on UGI contrast study. Therefore, we would advocate that all parents of patients undergoing laparotomy for malrotation should be informed of the risk of negative laparotomy as part of the consent process.

Keywords

malrotation - volvulus - negative laparotomy
 

  • References

  • 1 Aiken J, Oldham K. Malrotation. In: Ashkraft K, Holcomb G, Murphy J, eds. Pediatric Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005: 435-447
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Parish A, Hatley R. Intestinal Malrotation. Emedicine specialities: Paediatrics 2010. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/930313-overview
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lampl B, Levin TL, Berdon WE, Cowles RA. Malrotation and midgut volvulus: a historical review and current controversies in diagnosis and management. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (4) 359-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Byrne J. Disorders of the intestine and pancreas. In: Taeusch W, Ballard R, Avery M, eds. Disease of the Newborn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1991: 685-693
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Applegate KE, Anderson JM, Klatte EC. Intestinal malrotation in children: a problem-solving approach to the upper gastrointestinal series. Radiographics 2006; 26 (5) 1485-1500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Orzech N, Navarro OM, Langer JC. Is ultrasonography a good screening test for intestinal malrotation?. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41 (5) 1005-1009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Applegate KE. Evidence-based diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (Suppl. 02) S161-S163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Seashore JH, Touloukian RJ. Midgut volvulus. An ever-present threat. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994; 148 (1) 43-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Strouse PJ. Disorders of intestinal rotation and fixation (“malrotation”). Pediatr Radiol 2004; 34 (11) 837-851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Benya EC, Ben-Ami TE, Whitington PF, Alonso EM, Millis JM, Yousefzadeh DK. Duodenum and duodenal-jejunal junction in children: position and appearance after liver transplantation. Radiology 1998; 207 (1) 233-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yousefzadeh DK. The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (Suppl. 02) S172-S177
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dilley AV, Pereira J, Shi EC , et al . The radiologist says malrotation: does the surgeon operate?. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16 (1-2) 45-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 El-Gohary Y, Alagtal M, Gillick J. Long-term complications following operative intervention for intestinal malrotation: a 10-year review. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26 (2) 203-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Daneman A. Malrotation: the balance of evidence. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (Suppl. 02) S164-S166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hagendoorn J, Vieira-Travassos D, van der Zee D. Laparoscopic treatment of intestinal malrotation in neonates and infants: retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (1) 217-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fraser JD, Aguayo P, Sharp SW, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD. The role of laparoscopy in the management of malrotation. J Surg Res 2009; 156 (1) 80-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar