Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2012; 216(03): 141-146
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309050
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Late preterms: Auswirkungen des fetalen Geschlechts auf das neonatologische Outcome

Late Preterms: The Influence of Foetal Gender on Neonatal Outcome
K. Herz
1   Asklepios proresearch, Hamburg
,
P. Wohlmuth
1   Asklepios proresearch, Hamburg
,
B. Liedtke
3   Abteilung Neonatologie, Asklepios Klinik Hamburg-Barmbek
,
S. Schmidt
4   Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Philipps-Universität, Marburg
,
B. J. Hackelöer
2   Abteilung Geburtshilfe und Pränatalmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Hamburg-Barmbek
,
L. Hellmeyer
2   Abteilung Geburtshilfe und Pränatalmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Hamburg-Barmbek
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht15 February 2012

angenommen nach Überarbeitung06 April 2012

Publication Date:
21 June 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund:

Die Gruppe der sogenannten späten Frühgeborenen („Late preterm“- Kinder mit einem Gestationsalter von 340/7–366/7 Schwangerschaftswochen (SSW)) wird hinsichtlich ihres neonatologischen Outcomes unterschätzt. Bei vor der 29. SSW geborenen Kindern zeigte sich ein für Mädchen vorteilhafter geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschied bezüglich der Morbidität. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, zu prüfen ob diese Ergebnisse auf die Late preterm-Gruppe übertragbar sind.

Methode:

Untersucht wurde das neonatale Outcome bei 528 konsekutiven intensivpflichtigen Einlingen des Gestationsalters 340/7–366/7 Wochen.

Ergebnisse:

Neonatologische Komplikationen wurden auf Geschlechtsspezifität geprüft. Jungen (n=292) wiesen signifikant häufiger eine Sepsis (3,8 vs. 0,9%; p=0,0314, x 2-Test), Mädchen signifikant längere Aufenthalte auf der neonatologischen Intensivstation auf (Median 12 (Q1:8; Q3:17) vs. 11 (6;16) Tage; p=0,0149, t-Test). Im multiplen logistischen Regressionsmodell zeigte sich eine grenzwertige Signifikanz für das männliche Geschlecht und für vorzeitigen Blasensprung bezüglich des Auftretens einer Sepsis – ein 4,4-faches Risiko für Jungen (OR=0,228 [95% CI: 0,050–1,041]; p=0,0564) und ein 3,5-faches Risiko für vorzeitigen Blasensprung (OR=3,462 [0,938–12,779]; p=0,0623). Als starke Einflussgrößen für die Aufenthaltsdauer auf der Intensivstation zeigten sich nach Adjustierung Geburtsgewicht, Gestationsalter und vorzeitiger Blasensprung.

Schlussfolgerung:

Der Einfluss des fetalen Geschlechtes auf das neonatologische Outcome hat sich in der Late preterm-Gruppe (340/7–366/7 SSW) relativiert.

Abstract

Background:

The group of the so-called late preterms (infants born at 340/7–366/7 weeks gestational age) has been underestimated with respect to their neonatal outcome. Among infants born before the 29th week of pregnancy, a gender-specific difference in favour of females regarding morbidity became evident. The aim of this study is to investigate whether these findings are transferable to the group of late preterms.

Methods:

The neonatal outcome of 528 consecutive singletons, born at 340/7–366/7 weeks gestational age and requiring intensive care, was examined.

Results:

Neonatal complications have been particularly analysed with regard to gender-specific differences. Boys (n=292) were significantly more frequently affected by sepsis (3.8 vs. 0.9%; p=0,0314, x 2-test). Girls had significantly longer stays in the neonatal intensive care unit (median 12 (Q1:8; Q3:17) vs. 11 (6;16) days; p=0.0149, t-test). In a multiple logistic regression model, male gender and premature rupture of membranes were borderline significant with respect to the occurrence of sepsis – boys had a 4.4-fold risk (OR=0.228 [95% CI: 0.050–1.041]; p=0.0564) and premature rupture of membranes had a 3.5-fold risk (OR=3.462 [0.938–12.779]; p=0.0623). Strong cause variables for the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit were birth weight, gestational age and premature rupture of membranes after adjustment.

Conclusion:

The influence of foetal gender on the neonatal outcome in the late preterm group (340/7–366/7 gestational age) has been relativised.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Eu benchmarking report 2009/2010 Benchmarking. European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI) 2010
  • 2 WHO|International Classification of Diseases (ICD) (n.d.). World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
  • 3 Hummler HD, Poets C, Vochem M et al. Mortality and morbidity of very premature infants in Baden-Württemberg depending on hospital size. Is the current degree of regionalization adequate?. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie 2006; 210 (01) 6-11
  • 4 Eu benchmarking report 2009/2010 Statistics. European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI) 2010
  • 5 Raju TNK, Higgins RD, Stark AR et al. Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (03) 1207-1214
  • 6 Khashu M, Narayanan M, Bhargava S et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with preterm birth at 33 to 36 weeks’ gestation: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (01) 109-113
  • 7 Cheng Y, Kaimal A, Bruckner T et al. Perinatal morbidity associated with late preterm deliveries compared with deliveries between 37 and 40 weeks of gestation. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2011; 118 (12) 1446-1454
  • 8 Bastek JA, Sammel MD, Paré E et al. Adverse neonatal outcomes: examining the risks between preterm, late preterm, and term infants. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2008; 199 (04) 367.e1-e8
  • 9 Nelle M, Gerull R. Iatrogene Frühgeburt und Späte Frühgeborene 340/7 bis 366/7 – Risiken und Chancen TT – Iatrogenic Preterm Births and Late Preterm Births of 340/7 to 366/7 – Risks and Chances. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011; 215 (04) 152,157 LA – DE
  • 10 Mally PV, Bailey S, Hendricks-Muñoz KD. Clinical issues in the management of late preterm infants. Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care 2010; 40 (09) 218-233
  • 11 Guasch XD, Torrent FR, Martínez-Nadal S et al. Late preterm infants: A population at underestimated risk. Anales de pediatría (Barcelona, Spaiñ: 2003) 2009; 71 (04) 291-298
  • 12 Ramachandrappa A, Jain L. Health issues of the late preterm infant. Pediatric clinics of North America 2009; 56 (03) 565-577 Table of Contents
  • 13 Wang ML, Dorer DJ, Fleming MP et al. Clinical outcomes of near-term infants. Pediatrics 2004; 114 (02) 372-376 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15286219
  • 14 Engle WA. Morbidity and mortality in late preterm and early term newborns: a continuum. Clinics in perinatology 2011; 38 (03) 493-516
  • 15 Beinder E. Einfluss der iatrogenen Frühgeburt auf die frühkindliche Morbidität TT – Impact of Iatrogenic Preterm Birth on Newborn Morbidity. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011; 215 (04) 133,138 LA – DE
  • 16 Elsmén E, Pupp IH, Hellström-Westas L. Preterm male infants need more initial respiratory and circulatory support than female infants. Acta Paediatrica 2004; 93 (04) 529-533
  • 17 Pollak A, Birnbacher R. Preterm male infants need more initial respiratory support than female infants. Acta Paediatrica 2004; 93 (04) 447-448
  • 18 Brothwood M, Wolke D, Gamsu H et al. Prognosis of the very low birthweight baby in relation to gender. Archives of disease in childhood 1986; 61 (06) 559-564 Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1777831&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  • 19 Kent AL, Wright IMR, Abdel-Latif ME. Mortality and Adverse Neurologic Outcomes Are Greater in Preterm Male Infants. Pediatrics 2011;
  • 20 Ingemarsson I. Gender aspects of preterm birth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003; 110 (s20) 34-38
  • 21 Iams JD, Berghella V. Care for women with prior preterm birth. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2010; 203 (02) 89-100
  • 22 Nomura Y, Halperin JM, Newcorn JH et al. The risk for impaired learning-related abilities in childhood and educational attainment among adults born near-term. Journal of pediatric psychology 2009; 34 (04) 406-418
  • 23 Kirkegaard I, Obel C, Hedegaard M et al. Gestational age and birth weight in relation to school performance of 10-year-old children: a follow-up study of children born after 32 completed weeks. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (04) 1600-1606
  • 24 Morse SB, Zheng H, Tang Y et al. Early school-age outcomes of late preterm infants. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (04) e622-e629
  • 25 Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. The New England journal of medicine 2008; 359 (03) 262-273
  • 26 Swamy GK, Ostbye T, Skjaerven R. Association of preterm birth with long-term survival, reproduction, and next-generation preterm birth. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2008; 299 (12) 1429-1436
  • 27 Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (03) 443-456
  • 28 Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB et al. Early-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. The Journal of pediatrics 1996; 129 (01) 72-80 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8757565
  • 29 Klinger G, Levy I, Sirota L et al. Outcome of early-onset sepsis in a national cohort of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (04) e736-e740
  • 30 Pulver LS, Denney JM, Silver RM et al. Morbidity and discharge timing of late preterm newborns. Clinical pediatrics 2010; 49 (11) 1061-1067