How to write a scientific paper in a way that may increase its chance of publication

Abstract

In this paper we will look at some of the reasons for rejection and how you can use this to improve your chances for publication. There is no single best way to prepare and write a paper and there are many circumstances around each and every research work. But there is a clear need to follow some steps in the writing process which will make the struggle with the manuscript so much more enjoyable.

Structure your manuscript properly; however this is not always enough. In this paper we will give tips and tricks to how you should look at the different sections of your manuscript.

Decide early which journal you intend to submit to. We strongly suggest that the decision is taken even before the writing procedure is started. This facilitates the process of following guidelines for authors for the journal to which you are submitting.

The difficult part to accept – is your paper justified? Lack of clinical relevance will almost certainly lead to rejection. Also if it adds no new knowledge to the subject you should prepare yourself for rejection. It is often hard for the authors to realize this. Also remember the importance of writing your manuscript in fluent English.

• References

• 1 Calcagno V, Demoinet E, Gollner K, Guidi L, Ruths D, de Mazancourt C. Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science 2012; 338: 1065-9
• 2 Khosla A, McDonald RJ, Bornmann L, Kallmes DF. Getting to Yes: The Fate of Neuroradiology Manuscripts Rejected by Radiology over a 2-year Period. Radiology 2011; 260: 3-5
• 3 http://circ.ahajournals.org/site/misc/stats.xhtml (May 2013)
• 4 Bachmann Nielsen M, Jaeger K. How to write and publish a successful scientific article. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 472-474
• 5 Tompson A. How to write an English medical manuscript that will be published and have impact. Surg Today 2006; 36: 407-409
• 6 Ehara S, Takahashi K. Reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to AJR by international authors. AJR 2007; 188: W113-W116