Levels of Mobility in Children and Adolescents with Spina Bifida—Clinical Parameters Predicting Mobility and Maintenance of These Skills

Abstract

Purpose The retrospective study was performed to apply the “Hoffer criteria” as a suitable classification of mobility in spina bifida patients. We looked at clinical parameters and factors that can be used as predictors for future mobility and development in these patients.

Materials and Methods Clinical data about ambulation of 90 spina bifida/myelomeningocele patients were collected using a questionnaire and were completed using the medical records of the patients. The patients were grouped by their walking distances according to “Hoffeŕs criteria” (community walker, household walker, exercise walker, nonwalker). The development of the mobility skills over the years was documented.

Results We grouped 42% of the patients as community walkers, 16% as household, 16% as exercise walkers, and 27% as always wheelchair dependent (nonwalker). We found significant correlations between the Hoffer criteria, the level of lesion the walking distance and the ability to stand upright. There is also a significant relation between the Hoffer criteria and the frequency of fractures and the age of the patients. The occurrence of fractures is directly related to the level of lesion and to the level of mobility in our group of patients. Of all our patients, 39% patients had improved in mobility, 37% patients retained their achieved state, and 24% worsened in their mobility skills.

Conclusions We could see that a stable and ambitious milieu and care in specialized institutions can achieve a high level of ambulation in spina bifida patients. Most patients are able to maintain this skill over a long period of time. Predictive factors to maintain mobility in patients with myelomeningoceles (spina bifida) are not only dependent on the level of lesion but also rely on the aftercare of the patients too. The data that were collected are used for counseling of parents and patients.

Keywords

mobility - spina bifida - ambulation

• References

• 1 Shurtleff DB, Dudgeon B, McDonald C , et al. Mobility. In: Shurtleff DB, , ed. Myeoldyspalsias and Exstrophies: Significance, Prevention, and Treatment. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton Inc; 1986: 313-356
• 2 Hoffer MM, Feiwell E, Perry R, Perry J, Bonnett C. Functional ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55 (1) 137-148
• 3 Iborra J, Pagès E, Cuxart A. Neurological abnormalities, major orthopaedic deformities and ambulation analysis in a myelomeningocele population in Catalonia (Spain). Spinal Cord 1999; 37 (5) 351-357
• 4 Mazur JM, Shurtleff D, Menelaus M, Colliver J. Orthopaedic management of high-level spina bifida. Early walking compared with early use of a wheelchair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71 (1) 56-61
• 5 Roussos NP, Patrick JH, Hodnett C, Stallard J. A long-term review of severely disabled spina bifida patients using a reciprocal walking system. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23 (6) 239-244
• 6 De Souza LJ, Carroll N. Ambulation of the braced myelomeningocele patient. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58 (8) 1112-1118
• 7 Verhoef M, Barf HA, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Gooskens RH, Prevo AJ. Secondary impairments in young adults with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46 (6) 420-427
• 8 Asher M, Olson J. Factors affecting the ambulatory status of patients with spina bifida cystica. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65 (3) 350-356
• 9 Cate IM, Kennedy C, Stevenson J. Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44 (5) 317-322
• 10 Pages E, Sanchez J, Iborra J , et al. Bone Mineral Density in patients with Myelomeningocele. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2005; 2: 28
• 11 Schoenmakers MA, Uiterwaal CS, Gulmans VA, Gooskens RH, Helders PJ. Determinants of functional independence and quality of life in children with spina bifida. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19 (6) 677-685
• 12 Schoenmakers MA, Gulmans VA, Gooskens RH, Pruijs JE, Helders PJ. Spinal fusion in children with spina bifida: influence on ambulation level and functional abilities. Eur Spine J 2005; 14 (4) 415-422
• 13 Ouyang L, Grosse SD, Armour BS, Waitzman NJ. Health care expenditures of children and adults with spina bifida in a privately insured U.S. population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2007; 79 (7) 552-558
• 14 Lynn MD. Comment on: Orthopaedic management of high- level spina bifida. Early walking compared with early use of wheelchair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71 (6) 953
• 15 Chang CK, Wong TT, Huang BS, Chan RC, Yang TF. Spinal dysraphism: a cross-sectional and retrospective multidisciplinary clinic-based study. J Chin Med Assoc 2008; 71 (10) 502-508
• 16 Hunt GM, Oakeshott P. Lifestyle in adults aged 35 years who were born with open spina bifida: prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2004; 1 (1) 4
• 17 Szalay EA. Orthopaedic management of the lower extremities in spina bifida. Instr Course Lect 1987; 36: 275-284
• 18 Doherty D, Shurtleff DB. Pediatric perspective on prenatal counseling for myelomeningocele. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006; 76 (9) 645-653