Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2012; 26(03): 109-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329413
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Current Laser Resurfacing Technologies: A Review that Delves Beneath the Surface

Jason Preissig
1   Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Kristy Hamilton
1   Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Ramsey Markus
1   Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 November 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Numerous laser platforms exist that rejuvenate the skin by resurfacing its upper layers. In varying degrees, these lasers improve the appearance of lentigines and rhytides, eliminate photoaging, soften scarring due to acne and other causes, and treat dyspigmentation. Five major classes of dermatologic lasers are currently in common use: ablative and nonablative lasers in both fractionated and unfractionated forms as well as radiofrequency technologies. The gentler nonablative lasers allow for quicker healing, whereas harsher ablative lasers tend to be more effective. Fractionating either laser distributes the effect, increasing the number of treatments but minimizing downtime and complications. In this review article, the authors seek to inform surgeons about the current laser platforms available, clarify the differences between them, and thereby facilitate the identification of the most appropriate laser for their practice.

Keywords

laser - skin - resurfacing - photorejuvenation - ablation - fractional
 

  • References

  • 1 Chwalek J, Goldberg DJ. Ablative skin resurfacing. Curr Probl Dermatol 2011; 42: 40-47
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Alexiades-Armenakas MR, Dover JS, Arndt KA. The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58 (5) 719-737 , quiz 738–740
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ross EV, McKinlay JR, Anderson RR. Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work? A review. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135 (4) 444-454
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Alster TS, West TB. Resurfacing of atrophic facial acne scars with a high-energy, pulsed carbon dioxide laser. Dermatol Surg 1996; 22 (2) 151-154 , discussion 154–155
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Alster TS, Nanni CA, Williams CM. Comparison of four carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (3) 153-158, commentary 159
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ward PD, Baker SR. Long-term results of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of the face. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (4) 238-243 , discussion 244–245
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Alster TS, Lupton JR. Prevention and treatment of side effects and complications of cutaneous laser resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (1) 308-316 , discussion 317–318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP. Long-term effectiveness and side effects of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing for photoaged facial skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40 (3) 401-411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ross EV, Miller C, Meehan K , et al. One-pass CO2 versus multiple-pass Er:YAG laser resurfacing in the treatment of rhytides: a comparison side-by-side study of pulsed CO2 and Er:YAG lasers. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27 (8) 709-715
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Newman JB, Lord JL, Ash K, McDaniel DH. Variable pulse erbium:YAG laser skin resurfacing of perioral rhytides and side-by-side comparison with carbon dioxide laser. Lasers Surg Med 2000; 26 (2) 208-214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Goldman MP, Manuskiatti W. Combined laser resurfacing with the 950-microsec pulsed CO2 + Er:YAG lasers. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (3) 160-163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Goldman MP, Marchell N, Fitzpatrick RE. Laser skin resurfacing of the face with a combined CO2/Er:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26 (2) 102-104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Ciocon DH, Doshi D, Goldberg DJ. Non-ablative lasers. Curr Probl Dermatol 2011; 42: 48-55
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hantash BM, Gladstone HB. Current role of resurfacing lasers. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2009; 144 (3) 229-241
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Jih MH, Friedman PM, Goldberg LH, Robles M, Glaich AS, Kimyai-Asadi A. The 1450-nm diode laser for facial inflammatory acne vulgaris: dose-response and 12-month follow-up study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55 (1) 80-87
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 DeHoratius DM, Dover JS. Nonablative tissue remodeling and photorejuvenation. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25 (5) 474-479
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Bogle MA. Fractionated mid-infrared resurfacing. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2008; 27 (4) 252-258
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Zhenxiao Z, Aie X, Yuzhi J , et al. Exploring the role of a nonablative laser (1320 nm cooltouch laser) in skin photorejuvenation. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17 (4) 505-509
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Medhat W, Moawad O, Mahoney MG, Uitto J. Effects of the Nd:YAG 1320-nm laser on skin rejuvenation: clinical and histological correlations. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2011; 13 (3) 98-106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Yaghmai D, Garden JM, Bakus AD, Massa MC. Comparison of a 1,064 nm laser and a 1,320 nm laser for the nonablative treatment of acne scars. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31 (8 Pt 1) 903-909
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Orringer JS, Kang S, Maier L , et al. A randomized, controlled, split-face clinical trial of 1320-nm Nd:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56 (3) 432-438
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bhatia AC, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Stewart B, Alam M. Patient satisfaction and reported long-term therapeutic efficacy associated with 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser treatment of acne scarring and photoaging. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32 (3) 346-352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Chan HH, Lam LK, Wong DS, Kono T, Trendell-Smith N. Use of 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser for wrinkle reduction and the treatment of atrophic acne scarring in Asians. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 34 (2) 98-103
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wada T, Kawada A, Hirao A, Sasaya H, Oiso N. Efficacy and safety of a low-energy double-pass 1450-nm diode laser for the treatment of acne scars. Photomed Laser Surg 2012; 30 (2) 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Friedman PM, Jih MH, Kimyai-Asadi A, Goldberg LH. Treatment of inflammatory facial acne vulgaris with the 1450-nm diode laser: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30 (2 Pt 1) 147-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Comparison of a 1450-nm diode laser and a 1320-nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of atrophic facial scars: a prospective clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30 (2 Pt 1) 152-157
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Paithankar DY, Ross EV, Saleh BA, Blair MA, Graham BS. Acne treatment with a 1,450 nm wavelength laser and cryogen spray cooling. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 31 (2) 106-114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 No D, McClaren M, Chotzen V, Kilmer SL. Sebaceous hyperplasia treated with a 1450-nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30 (3) 382-384
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Darné S, Hiscutt EL, Seukeran DC. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of the 1,450 nm laser in acne vulgaris: a randomized split-face, investigator-blinded clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165 (6) 1256-1262
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Tanzi EL, Williams CM, Alster TS. Treatment of facial rhytides with a nonablative 1,450-nm diode laser: a controlled clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29 (2) 124-128
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Noborio R, Nishida E, Morita A. Clinical effect of low-energy double-pass 1450 nm laser treatment for acne in Asians. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2009; 25 (1) 3-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Chua SH, Ang P, Khoo LS, Goh CL. Nonablative 1450-nm diode laser in the treatment of facial atrophic acne scars in type IV to V Asian skin: a prospective clinical study. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30 (10) 1287-1291
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Weiss RA, Gold M, Bene N , et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1440-nm laser delivered by microarray for treatment of photoaging and scars. J Drugs Dermatol 2006; 5 (8) 740-744
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Polder KD, Bruce S. Treatment of melasma using a novel 1,927-nm fractional thulium fiber laser: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (2) 199-206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Polder KD, Harrison A, Eubanks LE, Bruce S. 1,927-nm fractional thulium fiber laser for the treatment of nonfacial photodamage: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 2011; 37 (3) 342-348
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Alster TS, Tanzi EL, Lazarus M. The use of fractional laser photothermolysis for the treatment of atrophic scars. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (3) 295-299
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Rahman Z, Alam M, Dover JS. Fractional laser treatment for pigmentation and texture improvement. Skin Therapy Lett 2006; 11 (9) 7-11
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Wanner M, Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Fractional photothermolysis: treatment of facial and nonfacial cutaneous photodamage with a 1,550-nm erbium-doped fiber laser. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (1) 23-28
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Tanzi EL, Wanitphakdeedecha R, Alster TS. Fraxel laser indications and long-term follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (6) 675-678 , discussion 679–680
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Karsai S, Czarnecka A, Jünger M, Raulin C. Ablative fractional lasers (CO(2) and Er:YAG): a randomized controlled double-blind split-face trial of the treatment of peri-orbital rhytides. Lasers Surg Med 2010; 42 (2) 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Fife DJ, Fitzpatrick RE, Zachary CB. Complications of fractional CO2 laser resurfacing: four cases. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41 (3) 179-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Christiansen K, Bjerring P. Low density, non-ablative fractional CO2 laser rejuvenation. Lasers Surg Med 2008; 40 (7) 454-460
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Kaplan H, Gat A. Clinical and histopathological results following TriPollar radiofrequency skin treatments. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2009; 11 (2) 78-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Doshi SN, Alster TS. Combination radiofrequency and diode laser for treatment of facial rhytides and skin laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2005; 7 (1) 11-15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Alexiades-Armenakas MR. Rhytides, laxity, and photoaging treated with a combination of radiofrequency, diode laser, and pulsed light and assessed with a comprehensive grading scale. J Drugs Dermatol 2006; 5 (8) 731-738
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar