Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23(06): 499-501
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329710
Case Gallery
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Laparoscopic Repyloromyotomy following Open Pyloromyotomy for Recurrent Pyloric Stenosis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Anna Granström
1   Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Seth Felder
2   Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Philip Frykman
3   Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 August 2012

30 August 2012

Publication Date:
19 November 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints
Conclusion

When suspecting incomplete myotomy or recurrent IHPS, an UGI series should be obtained followed by a repeat ultrasound to aid in diagnosis. Based on our experience described, we believe that laparoscopic remyotomy can be performed safely, effectively, and with excellent cosmesis.

 

  • References

  • 1 Alain JL, Grousseau D, Terrier G. Extramucosal pyloromyotomy by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1991; 5 (4) 174-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S , et al. Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373 (9661) 390-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ankermann T, Engler S, Partsch C-J. Repyloromyotomy for recurrent infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis after successful first pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (11) E40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nasr A, Ein SH, Connolly B. Recurrent pyloric stenosis: to dilate or operate? A preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (2) e17-e20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 van Heurn LW, Vos P, Sie G. Recurrent vomiting after successful pyloromyotomy. Pediatr Surg Int 1999; 15 (5–6) 385-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Avolio L, Parigi GB. Redo operation for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is rare and is often caused by incomplete myotomy or accidental duodenal perforation. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38 (7) 1129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hulka F, Harrison MW, Campbell TJ, Campbell JR. Complications of pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Am J Surg 1997; 173 (5) 450-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Greason KL, Thompson WR, Downey EC, Lo Sasso B. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: report of 11 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30 (11) 1571-1574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Haricharan RN, Aprahamian CJ, Morgan TL, Harmon CM, Georgeson KE, Barnhart DC. Smaller scars—what is the big deal: a survey of the perceived value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (1) 92-96 , discussion 96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fischer JD. Smaller scars—what is the big deal: a survey ofthe perceived value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (8) 1580 , author reply 1580–1581
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ceccanti S, Mele E, Cozzi DA. The perceived cosmetic value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (8) 1579-1580 , author reply 1580–1581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kim SS, Lau ST, Lee SL , et al. Pyloromyotomy: a comparison of laparoscopic, circumumbilical, and right upper quadrant operative techniques. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201 (1) 66-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Oomen MWN, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R, Ubbink DT, Heij HA. Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on major complications. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (8) 2104-2110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar