Download PDF
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2013; 81(04): 188-194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1330333
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Kurz und einfach ist nicht immer besser: Grenzen kognitiver Demenzscreenings

Short and Simple is Not Always Better: Limitations of Cognitive Screening Tests
I. Uttner
1   Neurologische Klinik, Universität Ulm
,
S. Wittig
1   Neurologische Klinik, Universität Ulm
,
C. A. F. von Arnim
1   Neurologische Klinik, Universität Ulm
,
M. Jäger
2   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie II, Universität Ulm
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 April 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Kognitive Demenzscreenings erfreuen sich großer Beliebtheit. Dies ist auch eine Folge des üblichen Validierungsansatzes, der vorab definierte Patientengruppen vergleicht und so oftmals zu einer Überschätzung der Trennschärfe führt. 8 Patienten mit leichter Alzheimer-Demenz (AD) und 17 Kontrollpersonen wurden zwei Jahre nach Diagnosestellung untersucht. Appliziert wurden vier Kurztests sowie zwei elaborierte Testprozeduren, darunter ein lernpotenzialorientiertes Paradigma. Neben traditionellen Gruppenvergleichen wurde explorativ eine Clusteranalyse gerechnet. Während der Vergleich vorab definierter Gruppen für nahezu alle Verfahren signifikante Leistungsunterschiede zwischen AD-Patienten und Kontrollen auswies, gelang bei clusteranalytischer Auswertung eine ausreichend sichere Klassifikation lediglich anhand der elaborierten Testverfahren. Die Ergebnisse raten zur Vorsicht beim Einsatz von Demenzscreenings. Gleichzeitig verdeutlichen sie das Potenzial plastizitätsbasierter Teststrategien.

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) and limited resources in outpatient care have encouraged the distribution of cognitive screening tests, in spite of their frequently unsatisfying accuracy regarding the differentiation between incipient AD, depression and age-associated memory impairment. 8 patients with probable AD and 17 controls completed a neuropsychological follow-up two years after initial examination. Beside four screening tests a memory based testing-the-limits (TtL) paradigm as well as the German version of the California Verbal Learning Test were administered. Based on hierarchical cluster analysis we could demonstrate that only well elaborated tests, such as a plasticity based TtL paradigm, did classify AD-patients correctly. The findings confirm reservations against cognitive screening procedures in detecting dementia and suggest that dynamic test strategies offer a powerful diagnostic alternative to traditional status-oriented tests.

Schlüsselwörter

Alzheimer-Demenz - Frühdiagnostik - Kognition - Screening - Lernpotenzial

Schlüsselwörter

Alzheimer’s disease - early diagnosis - cognition - screening - plasticity
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2006; 366: 2112-2117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Boustani M, Peterson B, Hanson L et al. Screening for dementia in primary care: a summary of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 927-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association workgroup. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 263-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Des Rosiers G, Hodges JR, Berrios G. The neuropsychological differentiation of patients with very mild Alzheimer's disease and/or major depression. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 1256-1263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 3017-3022
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Calero MD, Navarro E. Relationship between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 653-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Albert MS, Dekosky ST, Dickson D et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association workgroup. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 270-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 S3-Leitlinie „Demenzen“. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie; 2009 http://www.dgn.org/images/stories/dgn/pdf/s3_leitlinie_demenzen.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ilmberger J. Deutsche Version des California Verbal Learning Tests. München: Institut für Medizinische Psychologie der Universität München; 1988
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Perry RJ, Hodges JR. Spectrum of memory dysfunction in degenerative disease. Curr Opin Neurol 1996; 9: 281-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shulman KI. Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test?. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15: 548-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cullen B, O'Neill B, Evans JJ. A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 790-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lonie JA, Tierney KM, Ebmeier KP. Screening for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 902-915
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Uttner I, Schurig N, von Arnim CA. Reduced benefit from mnemonic strategies in early-stage Alzheimer's disease: a brief testing-the-limits paradigm for clinical practice. J Neurol 2010; 257: 1718-1726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rosen WG, Moh RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1984; 141: 1356-1346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Künig G, Kaldune A, Stief V et al. CERAD und NOSGER. Der prädiktive Wert dieser Verfahren in der Demenzdiagnostik einer Schweizer gerontopsychiatrischen Patientenpopulation. Nervenarzt 2007; 78: 314-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Beinhoff U, Hilbert V, Bittner D et al. Screening for cognitive impairment: a triage for outpatient care. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005; 20: 278-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Starr JM, Lonie J. The influence of pre-morbid IQ on Mini-Mental State Examination score at time of dementia presentation. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007; 22: 382-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Loewenstein DA, Acevedo A, Schram L. Semantic interference in mild Alzheimer disease: preliminal findings. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003; 11: 252-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lockhart RS, Craik FIM. Levels of processing: a retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Can J Psychol 1990; 44: 87-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W et al. Multivariate Analysemethoden. 13. Aufl. Berlin: Springer; 2011
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rand WM. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J Am Stat Assoc 1971; 66 (336) 846-850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ismail Z, Rajji TK, Shulman KI. Brief cognitive screening instruments: an update. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 25: 111-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bressler SL, Menon V. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends Cogn Sci 2010; 14: 277-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Marra C, Ferraccioli M, Vita MG et al. Patterns of cognitive decline and rates of conversion to dementia in patients with degenerative and vascular forms of MCI. Curr Alzheimer Res 2011; 8: 24-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mahncke HW, Bronstone A, Merzenich MM. Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Prog Brain Res 2006; 157: 81-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bäckman L, Jones S, Berger AK et al. Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 2005; 19: 520-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Baltes PB, Staudinger UM, Lindenberger U. Lifespan psychology: theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annu Rev Psychol 1999; 50: 471-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Weingartner H, Cohen RM, Bunney WE et al. Memory-learning impairments in progressive dementia and depression. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 135-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar