First Total Synthesis of Lippialactone and Its C9 Epimer

Palakodety Radha Krishna; Rajesh Nomula; Ramesh Kunde

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1340314

Synthesis, Table of Contents

Synthesis 2014; 46(03): 307-312
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1340314

paper

First Total Synthesis of Lippialactone and Its C9 Epimer

Authors

Palakodety Radha Krishna*

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry Division, CSIR - Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 007, India Fax: +91(40)27160387 Email: prkgenius@iict.res.in
Rajesh Nomula

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry Division, CSIR - Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 007, India Fax: +91(40)27160387 Email: prkgenius@iict.res.in
Ramesh Kunde

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry Division, CSIR - Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 007, India Fax: +91(40)27160387 Email: prkgenius@iict.res.in

Abstract

All articles of this category

Abstract

This paper describes the first total synthesis of bioactive lippialactone and C9-epi-lippialactone adopting Keck asymmetric allylation/Barbier allylation and olefin cross-metathesis as the key steps.

Key words

lippialactone - 6-substituted α,β-unsaturated δ-lactones - l-threonine - Keck allylation - Barbier allylation - cross-metathesis

Full Text

References

References

1a Alemany A, Márquez C, Pascual C, Valverde S, Martínez-Ripoll M, Fayos J, Perales A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979; 3583
1b Coleman MT. D, English RB, Rivett DE. A. Phytochemistry 1987; 26: 1497
1c Achmad SA, Høyer T, Kjaer A, Makmur L, Norrestam R. Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B 1987; 41: 599
1d Collett LA, Davies-Coleman MT, Rivett DE. A. Phytochemistry 1998; 48: 651
1e Juliawaty LD, Kitajima M, Takayama H, Achmad SA, Aimi N. Phytochemistry 2000; 54: 989
1f Pereda-Miranda R, Fragoso-Serrano M, Cerda-García-Rojas CM. Tetrahedron 2001; 57: 47

2a Chakraborty TK, Purkait S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 49: 5502
2b Sabitha G, Fatima N, Gopal P, Reddy NC, Yadav JS. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009; 20: 184
2c Sabitha G, Gopal P, Reddy CN, Yadav JS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 6298
2d Kamal A, Balakrishna M, Reddy VP, Faazil S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2010; 21: 2517
2e Reddy SC, Kumar SK. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 2647
2f Sharma A, Gamre S, Chattopadhyay S, Ghadigaonkar S, Koli MR, Choudhary MK. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2012; 23: 1093
2g Prasad KR, Phaneendra G. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 3313

3a Sam TW, Yeu CS, Jodynis-Liebert J, Murias M, Bloszyk E. Planta Med. 2000; 66: 199
3b Murga J, Falomoir E, Garcia-Fortanet J, Carda M, Marco JA. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 3447

4a Hoffmann HM. R, Rabe J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985; 24: 94
4b Rychnovsky SD. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 2021
4c Hagen SE, Vara Prasad JV. N, Tait BD. Adv. Med. Chem. 2000; 5: 159
4d Inayat-Hussain SH, Annuar BO, Din LB, Ali AM, Ross D. Toxicol. in Vitro 2003; 17: 433
4e Kikuchi H, Sasaki K, Sekiya J, Maeda Y, Amagai A, Kubohara Y, Ohsima Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004; 12: 3203

5 Ludere MT, van Ree T, Vleggaar R. Fitoterapia 2013; 86: 188

6a Radha Krishna P, Ramana Reddy VV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 3905
6b Radha Krishna P, Srinivas Reddy P. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 3995
6c Radha Krishna P, Srinivas R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 2013
6d Radha Krishna P, Srinivas R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007; 18: 2197
6e Radha Krishna P, Srinivas P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 2295

7a Chatterjee AK, Grubbs RH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 3171
7b Nolen EG, Kurish AJ, Wong KA, Orlando MD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003; 44: 2449
7c Grubbs RH. Tetrahedron 2004; 60: 7117
7d Radha Krishna P, Dayakar G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 7279
7e Radha Krishna P, Shiva Kumar E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 6676
7f Truong VL, Marrow M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 758

8a Servi S. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 5867
8b Kirschning A, Kreimeyer M, Blanke HP. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993; 4: 2347
8c Daniel SJ, Myers AG. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 8554

9a Keck GE, Andrus MB, Romer DR. J. Org. Chem. 1991; 56: 417
9b Rawal VH, Zhong HM, Sohn J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 386
9c Srinivasan KV, Venkatesan K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008; 19: 209
9d Prasad KR, Penchalaiah K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2010; 21: 2853

10a Yadav JS, Rami Reddy N. Tetrahedron 2010; 66: 3265
10b Radha Krishna P, Rajesh N, Ramana VD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 3612

11a Radha Krishna P, Prabhakar S, Ramna DV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 6843
11b Radha Krishna P, Jagannadha Rao T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 4017

12a Ogawa N, Kobayashi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 3001
12b Radha Krishna P, Anitha K, Raju G. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 1649

13a Still WC, Gennari C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983; 24: 4405
13b Radha Krishna P, Srinivas P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 2295

14 Wender PA, Koehler MF. T, Sendzik M. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 4549
15 The diastereomeric ratio of 7a/7b was determined by ¹H NMR analysis of the mixture, from the relative integration of the well-resolved, diagnostic protons due to O-CH₂-O (MOM) which resonated in 7a at δ 4.80 (q, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.72 (d, J = 6.8 Hz) and 4.64 (d, J = 6.8 Hz), while in 7b the same protons were observed at δ 4.76 (d, J = 6.8 Hz) and 4.70 (q, J = 7.0 Hz). Further, the O-CH₃ (MOM) protons appeared at δ 3.46 and 3.39 as singlets in 7a, while in 7b the same protons were observed at δ 3.43 and 3.41. The ratio was also confirmed by HPLC analysis {LCMS [column: XDB-C18, 30% H₂O (NH₄OAc, 10 mmol) in MeCN, flow rate: 1 mL/min, 230 nm]: t _R (major) = 3.825 min, t _R (minor) = 4.158 min}.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information (PDF) (opens in new window)