Forearm Fractures in Children: Split Opinions about Splitting the Cast

Abstract

Background Fractures of the forearm are the most common fractures in children. Various methods of cast immobilization have been recommended. Currently, there is still controversy regarding the optimal method of treatment, especially regarding the need for cast splitting.

Methods We conducted a single-center randomized and controlled trial between June 2008 and September 2009. Children younger than 16 years presenting to the emergency department with a closed fracture of the forearm needing reduction were eligible for random assignment to immobilization in a closed or split circumferential semirigid cast. The primary outcome was the incidence of cast-related soft-tissue problems such as compartment syndrome, neurovascular compromise, saw burns, or skin breakdown. The secondary outcome was fracture stability.

Results During this period, 100 patients were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures and analyzed. Follow-up was completed in 99 patients. No compartment syndrome was observed in either group. Moderate skin breakdown (< 2 cm²) occurred in two patients, one in the closed cast and one in the split cast group. Secondary splitting was necessary in one patient because of a reversible lymphedema. Significant secondary displacement of the fracture was slightly more common in the split group (5 of 50 patients [10%] vs. 4 of 49 patients [8%] in the closed cast group) without reaching statistical significance.

Conclusions No significant difference in the incidence of cast-related problems was observed between the groups. Fracture stability was comparable in both groups. We suggest that closed circumferential semirigid casts are a safe and effective immobilization technique for fractures of the forearm in children and splitting can be omitted.

Keywords

forearm fractures in children - closed versus split cast - soft-tissue problems - fracture stability

• References

• 1 Hedström EM, Svensson O, Bergström U, Michno P. Epidemiology of fractures in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1) 148-153
• 2 Carson S, Woolridge DP, Colletti J, Kilgore K. Pediatric upper extremity injuries. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006; 53 (1) 41-67 , v
• 3 Herman MJ, Marshall ST. Forearm fractures in children and adolescents: a practical approach. Hand Clin 2006; 22 (1) 55-67
• 4 Bae DS. Pediatric distal radius and forearm fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (10) 1911-1923
• 5 Webb GR, Galpin RD, Armstrong DG. Comparison of short and long arm plaster casts for displaced fractures in the distal third of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (1) 9-17
• 6 Bohm ER, Bubbar V, Yong Hing K, Dzus A. Above and below-the-elbow plaster casts for distal forearm fractures in children. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (1) 1-8
• 7 Bingold AC. On splitting plasters. A useful analogy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1979; 61-B (3) 294-295
• 8 Davids JR, Frick SL, Skewes E, Blackhurst DW. Skin surface pressure beneath an above-the-knee cast: plaster casts compared with fiberglass casts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79 (4) 565-569
• 9 Walker RW, Draper E, Cable J. Evaluation of pressure beneath a split above elbow plaster cast. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82 (5) 307-310
• 10 Grottkau BE, Epps HR, Di Scala C. Compartment syndrome in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (4) 678-682
• 11 Kalyani BS, Fisher BE, Roberts CS, Giannoudis PV. Compartment syndrome of the forearm: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (3) 535-543
• 12 Shuler FD, Grisafi FN. Cast-saw burns: evaluation of skin, cast, and blade temperatures generated during cast removal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (12) 2626-2630
• 13 White R, Schuren J, Konn DR. Semi-rigid vs rigid glass fibre casting: a biomechanical assessment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003; 18 (1) 19-27
• 14 Constantine E, Steele DW, Eberson C, Boutis K, Amanullah S, Linakis JG. The use of local anesthetic techniques for closed forearm fracture reduction in children: a survey of academic pediatric emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007; 23 (4) 209-211
• 15 Kozin SH, Wood MB. Early soft-tissue complications after fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (1) 144-153
• 16 Marson BM, Keenan MA. Skin surface pressures under short leg casts. J Orthop Trauma 1993; 7 (3) 275-278
• 17 Ansari MZ, Swarup S, Ghani R, Tovey P. Oscillating saw injuries during removal of plaster. Eur J Emerg Med 1998; 5 (1) 37-39
• 18 Hang JR, Hutchinson AF, Hau RC. Risk factors associated with loss of position after closed reduction of distal radial fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31 (5) 501-506
• 19 Pretell Mazzini J, Rodriguez Martin J. Paediatric forearm and distal radius fractures: risk factors and re-displacement—role of casting indices. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (3) 407-412
• 20 Zamzam MM, Khoshhal KI. Displaced fracture of the distal radius in children: factors responsible for redisplacement after closed reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (6) 841-843