Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27(02): 090-095
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351227
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Full-Thickness Skin Grafting in Nasal Reconstruction

William M. Weathers
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Mohin Bhadkamkar
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Erik M. Wolfswinkel
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
James F. Thornton
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
14. August 2013 (online)

Abstract

Skin grafting in nasal reconstruction, long used by dermatologists, can provide superior results and can well be the “go to” procedure for nasal reconstruction. The upper two-thirds of the nose is composed of both flattened, featureless and often thin skin that is well recreated with defect-only full-thickness grafting. Skin grafting for the lower third of the nose has been practiced for years by dermatologists; over the last 4 to 5 years, it has been embraced by plastic surgeons. The patient and donor site selection is critical. Meticulous attention to graft selection, utilization of a no-touch technique during graft harvest and placement of surgical bolsters with through-and-through tacking sutures are essential to ensure 100% graft take and a successful aesthetic result.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hill TG. Contouring of donor skin in full-thickness skin grafting. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1987; 13 (8) 883-888
  • 2 McCluskey PD, Constantine FC, Thornton JF. Lower third nasal reconstruction: when is skin grafting an appropriate option?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (3) 826-835
  • 3 Hauben DJ, Baruchin A, Mahler A. On the histroy of the free skin graft. Ann Plast Surg 1982; 9 (3) 242-245
  • 4 Davis JS. The story of plastic surgery. Ann Surg 1941; 113 (5) 641-656
  • 5 Brady JG, Grande DJ, Katz AE. The purse-string suture in facial reconstruction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18 (9) 812-816
  • 6 Ratner D. Skin grafting. From here to there. Dermatol Clin 1998; 16 (1) 75-90
  • 7 Converse JM, Smahel J, Ballantyne Jr DL, Harper AD. Inosculation of vessels of skin graft and host bed: a fortuitous encounter. Br J Plast Surg 1975; 28 (4) 274-282
  • 8 Converse JM, Uhlschmid GK, Ballantyne Jr DL. “Plasmatic circulation” in skin grafts. The phase of serum imbibition. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 43 (5) 495-499
  • 9 Henry L, Marshall DC, Friedman EA, Goldstein DP, Dammin GJ. A histologic study of the human skin autograft. Am J Pathol 1961; 39: 317-332
  • 10 Smahel J. The healing of skin grafts. Clin Plast Surg 1977; 4 (3) 409-424
  • 11 Zarem HA, Zweifach BW, McGehee JM. Development of microcirculation in full thickness autogenous skin grafts in mice. Am J Physiol 1967; 212 (5) 1081-1085
  • 12 Collins PS, Farber GA. Postsurgical dermabrasion of the nose. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1984; 10 (6) 476-477
  • 13 Leibovitch I, Huilgol SC, Richards S, Paver R, Selva D. The Australian Mohs database: short-term recipient-site complications in full-thickness skin grafts. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32 (11) 1364-1368
  • 14 Baker S, Swanson NA. Local flaps in facial reconstruction. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995
  • 15 Michelson LN, Peck Jr GC, Kuo HR , et al. The quantification and distribution of nasal sebaceous glands using image analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996; 20 (4) 303-309
  • 16 Adams DC, Ramsey ML. Grafts in dermatologic surgery: review and update on full- and split-thickness skin grafts, free cartilage grafts, and composite grafts. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31 (8 Pt 2) 1055-1067
  • 17 Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction—beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (6) 1405-1416 , discussion 1417–1419