Download PDF
Interventionelle Radiologie Scan 2014; 02(02): 161-179
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365491
Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Uterusarterienembolisation symptomatischer Gebärmuttermyome

Christian Scheurig-Münkler
,
Thomas J. Kröncke
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 May 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints
Fazit

Mit der UAE steht betroffenen Frauen heute ein etabliertes und anerkanntes interventionell-radiologisches Verfahren zur Verfügung, das in der Lage ist, die oft stark beeinträchtigenden Beschwerden organerhaltend und minimal-invasiv zu heilen. Im langfristigen Verlauf von 10 Jahren profitieren über ¾ aller Frauen von der Behandlung und erleben eine Normalisierung ihrer Lebensqualität. Der vergleichsweise risikoarme Eingriff lässt sich dabei exzellent standardisieren und ist für erfahrene Interventionalisten rasch erlernbar. Vorbereitend ist die Durchführung einer MRT des Beckens einschließlich einer ergänzenden MR-Angiografie anzuraten. Erkenntnisse aus dieser sichern die Diagnose in Abgrenzung zu klinisch und sonografisch oft schwer zu differenzierenden Entitäten, helfen bei der Planung des Eingriffs und dienen der Abschätzung des postinterventionellen Verlaufs und der entsprechenden Beratung der Patientinnen, z. B. bezüglich eines möglichen vermehrten Gewebeabgangs bei Vorliegen großer submuköser Myome. Im Falle eines Kinderwunsches empfiehlt sich zunächst eine fachärztlich-gynäkologische Beratung in entsprechenden Zentren über die Möglichkeit einer operativen Myomentfernung. Ist diese nicht möglich oder mit einem hohen Risiko für eine Hysterektomie verbunden, kann auch diesen Frauen eine UAE angeboten werden. Darüber hinaus spielen Zahl und Größe der Leiomyome eine nur untergeordnete Rolle. Auch ein diffuser Organbefall oder das Vorliegen sehr großer Leiomyome ist effektiv mittels UAE behandelbar.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N et al. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 1995; 346: 671-672
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Freed MM, Spies JB. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids: a review of current outcomes. Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28: 235-241
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Van der Kooij SM, Bipat S, Hehenkamp WJK et al. Uterine artery embolization versus surgery in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 317 e1–e18
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Spies JB, Bradley LD, Guido R et al. Outcomes from leiomyoma therapies: comparison with normal controls. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 641-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kröncke T, David M. Uterine artery embolization (UAE) for fibroid treatment: results of the 4th Radiological Gynecological Expert Meeting. Rofo 2013; 185: 461-463
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stang A, Merrill RM, Kuss O. Hysterectomy in Germany: a DRG-based nationwide analysis, 2005–2006. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 108: 508-514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet 2001; 357: 293-298
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cramer SF, Patel A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 94: 435-438
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Islam MS, Protic O, Giannubilo SR et al. Uterine leiomyoma: available medical treatments and new possible therapeutic options. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 921-934
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Breckwoldt M, Kaufmann M, Pfleiderer A Hrsg. Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. 5. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2008
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Benagiano G, Habiba M, Brosens I. The pathophysiology of uterine adenomyosis: an update. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 572-579
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Ascher SM, Jha RC, Reinhold C. Benign myometrial conditions: leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 14: 281-304
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kröncke TJ. Imaging before and after uterine artery embolization. Radiologe 2008; 48: 639-648
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Williams PL, Coote JM, Watkinson AF. Pre-uterine artery embolization MRI: beyond fibroids. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 1143-1150
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kirby JM, Burrows D, Haider E et al. Utility of MRI before and after uterine fibroid embolization: why to do it and what to look for. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 705-716
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sulaiman S, Khaund A, McMillan N et al. Uterine fibroids – do size and location determine menstrual blood loss?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115: 85-89
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bachmann GA, Bahouth LA, Amalraj P et al. Uterine fibroids: correlations of anemia and pain to fibroid location and uterine weight. J Reprod Med 2011; 56: 463-466
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Stewart EA, Nowak RA. Leiomyoma-related bleeding: a classic hypothesis updated for the molecular era. Hum Reprod Update 1996; 2: 295-306
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gambadauro P. Dealing with uterine fibroids in reproductive medicine. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 32: 210-216
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou GuaouN et al. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 290-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hoellen F, Griesinger G, Bohlmann MK. Therapeutic drugs in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013; 14: 2079-2085
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 409-420
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 2008; 14: CR24-31
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Falcone T, Parker WH. Surgical management of leiomyomas for fertility or uterine preservation. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 856-868
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hald K, Noreng HJ, Istre O et al. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic occlusion of uterine arteries for leiomyomas: long-term results of a randomized comparative trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20: 1303-1310 quiz 1311
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Weichert W, Denkert C, Gauruder-Burmester A et al. Uterine arterial embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: a histopathologic evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 955-961
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Binkert CA, Andrews RT, Kaufman JA. Utility of nonselective abdominal aortography in demonstrating ovarian artery collaterals in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization for fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12: 841-845
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pelage JP, Walker WJ, Le DrefO et al. Ovarian artery: angiographic appearance, embolization and relevance to uterine fibroid embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2003; 26: 227-233
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Abbara S, Nikolic B, Pelage J-P et al. Frequency and extent of uterine perfusion via ovarian arteries observed during uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1558-1563
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Scheurig-Muenkler C, Poellinger A, Wagner M et al. Ovarian artery embolization in patients with collateral supply to symptomatic uterine leiomyomata. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34 (06) 1199-1207
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kröncke TJ. Myomembolisation – State of the Art. Radiologie up2date 2012; 12: 251-263
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 32 deSouza NM, Williams AD. Uterine arterial embolization for leiomyomas: perfusion and volume changes at MR imaging and relation to clinical outcome. Radiology 2002; 222: 367-374
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Scheurig-Muenkler C, Wagner M, Franiel T et al. Effect of uterine artery embolization on uterine and leiomyoma perfusion: evidence of transient myometrial ischemia on magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 1347-1353
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Pelage J-P, Laurent A, Wassef M et al. Uterine artery embolization in sheep: comparison of acute effects with polyvinyl alcohol particles and calibrated microspheres. Radiology 2002; 224: 436-445
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Siskin GP, Beck A, Schuster M et al. Leiomyoma infarction after uterine artery embolization: a prospective randomized study comparing tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus polyvinyl alcohol microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 58-65
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Abramowitz SD, Israel GM, McCarthy SM et al. Comparison of four embolic materials at uterine artery embolization by using postprocedural MR imaging enhancement. Radiology 2009; 250: 482-487
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Yu SCH, Lok I, Ho SSY et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of tris-acryl microspheres versus polyvinyl alcohol microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22: 1229-1235
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Spies JB, Allison S, Flick P et al. Spherical polyvinyl alcohol versus tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: results of a limited randomized comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 1431-1437
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kroencke TJ, Scheurig C, Lampmann LEH et al. Acrylamido polyvinyl alcohol microspheres for uterine artery embolization: 12-month clinical and MR imaging results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 47-57
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Katsumori T, Kasahara T, Akazawa K. Long-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles alone for symptomatic fibroids. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 848-854
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Barth MM, Spies JB. Ovarian artery embolization supplementing uterine embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 1177-1182
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Toor SS, Jaberi A, Macdonald DB et al. Complication rates and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 1153-1163
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF et al. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 199-S202
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Katsumori T, Kasahara T, Tsuchida Y et al. Amenorrhea and resumption of menstruation after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 103: 217-221
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Nelson HD. Menopause. Lancet 2008; 371: 760-770
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Hu NN, Kaw D, McCullough MF et al. Menopause and menopausal symptoms after ovarian artery embolization: a comparison with uterine artery embolization controls. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22: 710-715 e1
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Andrews RT, Brown PH. Uterine arterial embolization: factors influencing patient radiation exposure. Radiology 2000; 217: 713-722
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 48 White AM, Banovac F, Spies JB. Patient radiation exposure during uterine fibroid embolization and the dose attributable to aortography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18: 573-576
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker E-P et al. Optimisation strategies and justification: an example in uterine artery embolisation for fibroids. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 117: 50-53
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Poulsen B, Munk T, Ravn P. Long-term follow up after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2011; 90: 1281-1283
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Scheurig-Muenkler C, Koesters C, Powerski MJ et al. Clinical long-term outcome after uterine artery embolization: sustained symptom control and improvement of quality of life. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 765-771
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Goodwin SC, Spies JB, Worthington-Kirsch R et al. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 22-33
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Scheurig-Muenkler C, Lembcke A, Froeling V et al. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: long-term changes in disease-specific symptoms and quality of life. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 2036-2042
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Banovac F, Ascher SM, Jones DA et al. Magnetic resonance imaging outcome after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata with use of tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13: 681-688
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Kröncke TJ, Gauruder-Burmester A, Scheurig C et al. Transarterial embolization for uterine fibroids: clinical success rate and results of magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo 2005; 177: 89-98
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Coryell L, Stavropoulos SW et al. Outcomes following fibroid expulsion after uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22: 1586-1593
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Yousefi S, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, White AM et al. Repeat uterine artery embolization: indications and technical findings. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 1923-1929
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Tse G, Spies JB. Radiation exposure and uterine artery embolization: current risks and risk reduction. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 13: 148-153
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 59 David M, Kröncke T. Uterine fibroid embolisation – potential impact on fertility and pregnancy outcome. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2013; 73: 247-255
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Homer H, Saridogan E. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 324-330
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar