Download PDF
Endosc Int Open 2014; 02(02): E58-E64
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365528
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

EMR is not inferior to ESD for early Barrett’s and EGJ neoplasia: An extensive review on outcome, recurrence and complication rates

Yoriaki Komeda
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Marco Bruno
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Arjun Koch
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted: 20 August 2013

accepted after revision: 24 February 2014

Publication Date:
07 May 2014 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims In recent years, it has been reported that early Barrett’s and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) neoplasia can be effectively and safely treated using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) appears to be the safest EMR method. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the safety and efficacy of MBM compared with ESD for the treatment of early neoplasia in Barrett’s or at the EGJ.

Methods A literature review of studies published up to May 2013 on EMR and ESD for early Barrett’s esophagus (BE) neoplasia and adenocarcinoma at the EGJ was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Results on outcome parameters such as number of curative resections, complications and procedure times are compared and reported.

Results A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis in this study. There were no significant differences in recurrence rates when comparing EMR (10/380, 2.6 %) to ESD (1/333, 0.7 %) (OR 8.55; 95 %CI, 0.91 – 80.0, P = 0.06). All recurrences after EMR were treated with additional endoscopic resection. The risks of delayed bleeding, perforation and stricture rates in both groups were similar. The procedure was considerably less time-consuming in the EMR group (mean time 36.7 min, 95 %CI, 34.5 – 38.9) than in the ESD group (mean time 83.3 min, 95 %CI, 57.4 – 109.2).

Conclusions The MBM technique for EMR is as effective as ESD when comparing outcomes related to recurrence and complication rates for the treatment of early Barrett’s or EGJ neoplasia. The MBM technique is considerably less time-consuming.

 

  • References

  • 1 Lagergren J, Bergström R, Lindgren A et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 825-831
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Swisher SG, Deford L, Merriman KW et al. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 1126-1132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Peters FP, Kara MA, Rosmolen WD et al. Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 506-514
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ell C, May A, Pech O et al. Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 3-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Pech O, Behrens A, May A et al. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 2008; 57: 1200-1206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Rice TW, Falk GW, Achkar E et al. Surgical management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1832-1836
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 de Boer AG, van Lanschot JJ, van Sandick JW et al. Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4202-4208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG, Peters FP et al. Randomized trial on endoscopic resection-cap versus multiband mucosectomy for piecemeal endoscopic resection of early Barrett’s neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 35-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 van Vilsteren FG, Pouw RE, Herrero LA et al. Learning to perform endoscopic resection of esophageal neoplasia is associated with significant complications even within a structured training program. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 4-12
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Seewald S, Akaraviputh T, Seitz U et al. Circumferential EMR and complete removal of Barrett’s epithelium: a new approach to management of Barrett’s esophagus containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and intramucosal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 854-859
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Giovannini M, Bories E, Pesenti C et al. Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 782-787
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Soehendra N, Seewald S, Groth S et al. Use of modified multiband ligator facilitates circumferential EMR in Barrett’s esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 847-852
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Peters FP, Kara MA, Rosmolen WD et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1449-1457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Larghi A, Lightdale CJ, Ross AS et al. Long-term follow-up of complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection (CBE-EMR) for the treatment of high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1086-1091
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pouw RE, Peters FP, Sempoux C et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: report on a Brussels’ cohort. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 892-898
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Chennat J, Konda VJ, Ross AS et al. Complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma – an American single-center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2684-2692
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Pouw RE, Seewald S, Gondrie JJ et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for eradication of Barrett’s oesophagus with multi-center series of 169 patients. Gut 2010; 59: 1169-1177
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Moss A, Bourke MJ, Hourigan LF et al. Endoscopic resection for Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia and early esophageal adenocarcinoma: an essential staging procedure with long-term therapeutic benefit. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1276-1283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Alvarez HerreroL, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG et al. Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060 resections in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 177-183
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Gerke H, Siddiqui J, Nasr I et al. Efficacy and safety of EMR to completely remove Barrett’s esophagus: experience in 41 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 761-771
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 van Vilsteren FG, Pouw RE, Seewald S et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Gut 2011; 60: 765-773
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Peters FP, Kara MA, Curvers WL et al. Multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of Barrett’s esophagus: feasibility study with matched historical controls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 311-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Thomas T, Singh R, Ragunath K. Trimodal imaging-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection of early Barrett’s neoplasia. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1609-1613
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Buttar NS, Wang KK, Lutzke LS et al. Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy for esophageal neoplasia within Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 682-688
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 May A, Gossner L, Pech O et al. Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 14: 1085-1091
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Hirao M, Masuda K, Asanuma T et al. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer and other tumors with local injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 264-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Kodashima S, Fujishiro M, Yahagi N et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using flexknife. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 378-384
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T et al. Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 966-973
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H et al. A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 560-563
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Nakamoto S, Sakai Y, Kasanuki J et al. Indications for the use of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer in Japan: a comparative study with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 746-750
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Kakushima N, Yahagi N, Fujishiro M et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for tumors of the esophagogastric junction. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 170-174
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Yoshinaga S, Gotoda T, Kusano C et al. Clinical impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial adenocarcinoma located at the esophagogastric junction. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 202-209
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Hirasawa K, Kokawa A, Oka H et al. Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: long-term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 960-966
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Omae M, Fujisaki J, Horiuchi Y et al. Safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophagogastric junction cancer. Gastric Cancer 2013; 16: 147-154
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Imai K, Kakushima N, Tanaka M et al. Validation of the application of the Japanese curative criteria for superficial adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection: a long-term analysis. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2436-2445
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Hoteya S, Matsui A, Iizuka T et al. Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics and results of endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophagogastric junction and non-junctional cancers. Digestion 2013; 87: 29-33
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 58-62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Thomas T, Ayaru L, Lee EY et al. Length of Barrett’s segment predicts success of extensive endomucosal resection for eradication of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3627-3635
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 3-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma – 2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer 1998; 1: 10-24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Oyama T, Tomori A, Hotta K et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 7: S67-S70
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K et al. Success rate of curative endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision assisted by submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 507-512
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Pech O, May A, Manner H et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 652-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T et al. Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal cancer. Gut 2007; 56: 1625-1634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Eslick GD. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2009; 38: 17-25, vii
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ballantyne KC, Morris DL, Jones JA et al. Accuracy of identification of early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 618-619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Shimizu S, Tada M, Kawai K. Early gastric cancer: its surveillance and natural course. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 27-31
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Murata A, Muramatsu K, Ichimiya Y et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer in elderly Japanese patients: an observational study of financial costs of treatment based on a national administrative database. J Dig Dis 2014; 15: 62-70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar