Patient-posture and Ileal-intubation during colonoscopy (PIC): a randomized controlled open-label trial

Background and aims: Patient’s posture change is commonly employed by a colonoscopist to achieve complete examination. We studied whether patient’s posture (left-lateral decubitus vs supine) influenced the success rate of ileal intubation.

Patients and methods: In this prospective open-label randomized study performed in the Endoscopy Suite of a tertiary-care center, all adult outpatients referred for colonoscopy, in whom cecal intubation was achieved and who satisfied predefined inclusion criteria, were randomized to undergo ileal intubation in either of the above two postures. Colonoscopy (EC-201 WL, Fujinon) was performed after overnight poly-ethylene-glycol preparation, under conscious sedation and continuous pulse-oxymetry monitoring. After confirming cecal intubation, patients were randomized for ileal intubation. Success was defined by visualization of ileal mucosa or villi (confirmed by digital photography) and was attempted until limited by pain and/or time of ≥ 6 min.

Results: Of 320 eligible patients, 217 patients (150 males) were randomized, 106 to left-lateral decubitus and 111 to supine posture. At baseline, the two groups were evenly matched. Successful ileal intubation was achieved in 145 (66.8 %) patients overall, significantly higher in the supine posture (74.8 % versus 58.5 %; P = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, supine posture (P = 0.02), average/good right-colon preparation (P < 0.01), non-thin-lipped ileocecal (IC) valve (P < 0.001) and younger age (P = 0.02) were independent predictors of success. Positive ileal findings were recorded in 13 (9 %) patients.

Conclusion: Ileoscopy is more successful in supine than in left-lateral decubitus posture. Age, bowel preparation and type of IC valve also determine success.

• References

• 1 Williams C, Teague R. Colonoscopy. Gut 1973; 14: 990-1003
• 2 Cotton PB, Williams CB (ed.) Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy. Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Fifth edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2003: 83-171
• 3 Nagasako K, Yazawa C, Takemoto T. Biopsy of the terminal ileum. Gastrointest Endosc 1972; 19: 7-10
• 4 Baillie J. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Basic Principles and Practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd; 1992: 79-80
• 5 Bhasin DK, Goenka MK, Dhavan S et al. Diagnostic value of ileoscopy: a report from India. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 31: 144-146
• 6 Geboes K, Ectors N, D’Haens G et al. Is ileoscopy with biopsy worthwhile in patients presenting with symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease?. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 201-206
• 7 Morini S, Lorenzetti R, Stella F et al. Retrograde ileoscopy in chronic nonbloody diarrhea: a prospective, case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1512-1515
• 8 Jeong SH, Lee KJ, Kim YB et al. Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 51-55
• 9 Yusoff IF, Ormonde DG, Hoffman NE. Routine colonic mucosal biopsy and ileoscopy increases diagnostic yield in patients undergoing colonoscopy for diarrhea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 276-280
• 10 Misra SP, Dwivedi M, Misra V et al. Endoscopic biopsies from normal-appearing terminal ileum and cecum in patients with suspected colonic tuberculosis. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 612-616
• 11 Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. The reliability of cecal landmarks during colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 1993; 7: 33-36
• 12 Powell N, Knight H, Dunn J et al. Images of the terminal ileum are more convincing than cecal images for verifying the extent of colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 196-201
• 13 Sakai Y Section 6, Chapter 81 In: Sivak MV Jr, (ed.) Technique of Colonoscopy. Gastro-enterologic Endoscopy. Second edition. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1999
• 14 Kundrotas LW, Clement DJ, Kubik CM et al. A prospective evaluation of successful terminal ileum intubation during routine colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 544-546
• 15 Börsch G, Schmidt G. Endoscopy of the terminal ileum. Diagnostic yield in 400 consecutive examinations. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28: 499-501
• 16 Ansari A, Soon SY, Saunders BP et al. A prospective study of the technical feasibility of ileoscopy at colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 1184-1186
• 17 Chen M, Khanduja KS. Intubation of the ileocecal valve made easy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 494-496
• 18 Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: A valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-625
• 19 Iacopini G, Frontespezi S, Vitale MA et al. Routine ileoscopy at colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of learning curve and skill-keeping line. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 250-256
• 20 Powell N, Hayee BH, Yeoh DPK et al. Terminal ileal photography or biopsy to verify total colonoscopy: does the endoscope agree with the microscope?. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 320-325
• 21 Kennedy G, Larson D, Wolff B et al. Routine ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy: a useful maneuver?. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2606-2608
• 22 Yoong KKY, Heymann T. It is not worthwhile to perform ileoscopy on all patients. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 809-811
• 23 McHugh JB, Appelman HD, McKenna BJ. The diagnostic value of endoscopic terminal ileum biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1084-1089
• 24 Melton SD, Feagins LA, Saboorian MH et al. Ileal biopsy: Clinical indications, endoscopic and histopathologic findings in 10,000 patients. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 199-203
• 25 Cherian S, Singh P. Is routine ileoscopy useful? An observational study of procedure times, diagnostic yield, and learning curve. . Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2324-2329
• 26 De Silva AP, Kumarasena RS, Perera Keragala SD et al. The prone 12 o’clock position reduces ileal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o’clock (standard) position. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11: 89
• 27 Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Malhotra N et al. A comparison of evaluation, time pressure, and multitasking as stressors of psychomotor operative performance. Surgery 2011; 149: 776-782
• 28 Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Role of intravenously administered hyoscine butyl bromide in retrograde terminal ileoscopy: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 1820-1823
• 29 Rex DK. Achieving cecal intubation in the very difficult colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 938-944
• 30 Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC et al. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 1-8
• 31 Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2297-2303