Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365543
Urgent double balloon endoscopy provides higher yields than non-urgent double balloon endoscopy in overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
Publication History
submitted 18 October 2013
accepted after revision 23 January 2014
Publication Date:
07 May 2014 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/201402/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0034-1365543-1.jpg)
Background and study aims: In overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OV), double balloon endoscopy (DBE) is recommended as one of the most important investigations as it can provide both diagnosis and treatment. However, there is no set standard on the timing of DBE in OV. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic and therapeutic yields between urgent and non-urgent DBE in patients with OV.
Patients and methods: Between January 2006 and February 2013, 120 patients with OV who underwent DBE were retrospectively reviewed. An urgent DBE was defined as DBE performed within 72 h from the last visible gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 74) whereas a non-urgent DBE was defined as DBE performed after 72 h (n = 46). Diagnostic yields, therapeutic impact and clinical outcomes were evaluated.
Results: Diagnostic yield in urgent DBE was significantly higher than that in non-urgent DBE (70 % versus 30 %; P < 0.05). Urgent DBE offered significantly more therapies including endoscopic, angiographic embolization, and surgery than non-urgent DBE (54 % versus 15 %; P < 0.001). Endoscopic therapy was performed in 43 % of urgent-DBE patients whereas only 13 % of patients in the other group received endoscopic therapy (P < 0.01). In patients with identified bleeding sources, the rebleeding rate was lower in patients who underwent urgent DBE than in those who underwent non-urgent DBE (10 % versus 29 %, NS).
Conclusions: Regarding diagnostic and therapeutic impacts in OV, our retrospective study showed that urgent DBE is better than non-urgent DBE. The recurrent bleeding rate in patients undergoing urgent DBE tended to be lower.
-
References
- 1 Fisher L, Lee KrinskyM, Anderson MA et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 471-479
- 2 Mönkemüller K, Neumann H, Meyer F et al. A retrospective analysis of emergency double-balloon enteroscopy for small-bowel bleeding. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 715-717
- 3 Lecleire S, Iwanicki-Caron I, Di-Fiore A et al. Yield and impact of emergency capsule enteroscopy in severe obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 337-342
- 4 Almeida N, Figueiredo P, Lopes S et al. Urgent capsule endoscopy is useful in severe obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: 87-92
- 5 Raju GS, Gerson L, Das A et al. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 1697-1717
- 6 Nakamura M, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N et al. Preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 59-66
- 7 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K et al. Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 1010-1016
- 8 Hadithi M, Heine GD, Jacobs MA et al. A prospective study comparing video capsule endoscopy with double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 682
- 9 Tanaka S, Mitsui K, Yamada Y et al. Diagnostic yield of double-balloon endoscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 683-691
- 10 Estévez E, González-Conde B, Vázquez-Iglesias JL et al. Diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes after capsule endoscopy in 100 consecutive patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 881-888
- 11 Yano T, Yamamoto H, Sunada K et al. Endoscopic classification of vascular lesions of the small intestine (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 169-172
- 12 Shinozaki S, Yamamoto H, Yano T et al. Long-term outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding investigated by double-balloon endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 151-158
- 13 Fujita M, Manabe N, Honda K et al. Long-term outcome after double-balloon endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Digestion 2010; 82: 173-178
- 14 Ohmiya N, Yano T, Yamamoto H et al. Diagnosis and treatment of obscure GI bleeding at double balloon endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 72-77
- 15 Carey EJ, Leighton JA, Heigh RI et al. A single-center experience of 260 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 89-95
- 16 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E et al. Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 643-653
- 17 Apostolopoulos P, Liatsos C, Gralnek IM et al. Evaluation of capsule endoscopy in active, mild-to-moderate, overt, obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 1174-1181
- 18 Rondonotti E, Marmo R, Petracchini M et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) diagnostic algorithm for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: eight burning questions from everyday clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 179-185
- 19 Gerson L, Kamal A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of management strategies for obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 920-936