Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2014; 02(04): E244-E251
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377980
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Self-Expanding Metal Stent (SEMS): an innovative rescue therapy for refractory acute variceal bleeding

Kinesh Changela
Department of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, New York, United States
,
Mel A. Ona
Department of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, New York, United States
,
Sury Anand
Department of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, New York, United States
,
Sushil Duddempudi
Department of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, New York, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 12. Februar 2014

accepted after revision 07. Juli 2014

Publikationsdatum:
24. Oktober 2014 (online)

Preview

Background: Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a life-threatening complication of liver cirrhosis or less commonly splenic vein thrombosis. Pharmacological and endoscopic interventions are cornerstones in the management of variceal bleeding but may fail in 10 – 15 % of patients. Rescue therapy with balloon tamponade (BT) or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) may be required to control refractory acute variceal bleeding effectively but with some limitations. The self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) is a covered, removable tool that can be deployed in the lower esophagus under endoscopic guidance as a rescue therapy to achieve hemostasis for refractory AVB.

Aims: To evaluate the technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety of SEMS as a rescue therapy for AVB.

Methods: In this review article, we have performed an extensive literature search summarizing case reports and case series describing SEMS as a rescue therapy for AVB. Indications, features, technique, deployment, success rate, limitations, and complications are discussed.

Results: At present, 103 cases have been described in the literature. Studies have reported 97.08 % technical success rates in deployment of SEMS. Most of the stents were intact for 4 – 14 days with no major complications reported. Stent extraction had a success rate of 100 %. Successful hemostasis was achieved in 96 % of cases with only 3.12 % found to have rebleeding after placement of SEMS. Stent migration, which was the most common complication, was observed in 21 % of patients.

Conclusion: SEMS is a safe and effective alternative approach as a rescue therapy for refractory AVB.