Synlett 2014; 25(15): 2201-2207
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378517
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Magnetically Separable Nano Fe3O4 Catalyzed Direct Azidation of Allylic and Benzylic Alcohols Followed by Copper-Catalyzed Click Reaction

Naveen,
Nayyar Ahmad Aslam
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Manauli P.O., Punjab, 140306, India   Fax: +91(172)2240266   eMail: sababu@iisermohali.ac.in
,
Srinivasarao Arulanda Babu*
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Manauli P.O., Punjab, 140306, India   Fax: +91(172)2240266   eMail: sababu@iisermohali.ac.in
,
Dharmendra Kumar Singh
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Manauli P.O., Punjab, 140306, India   Fax: +91(172)2240266   eMail: sababu@iisermohali.ac.in
,
Ameet Rana
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Manauli P.O., Punjab, 140306, India   Fax: +91(172)2240266   eMail: sababu@iisermohali.ac.in
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 06. Mai 2014

Accepted after revision: 20. Juni 2014

Publikationsdatum:
04. August 2014 (online)


Abstract

A competent one-pot method comprising magnetically separable nano Fe3O4 catalyzed direct azidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols followed by the copper-catalyzed click reaction of the corresponding azides with alkynes is reported. This method gave a direct access to several 1,2,3-triazoles starting from various allylic and benzylic alcohols via their respective azides.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Sanz R, Martínez A, Miguel D, Álvarez-Gutiérrez JM, Rodríguez F. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006; 348: 1841
  • 2 Emer E, Sinisi R, Capdevila MG, Petruzziello D, De Vincentiis F, Cozzi PG. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 647
  • 3 Bandini M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 994
  • 4 Kumar R, Van der Eycken EV. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 1121
  • 5 Shirakawa S, Shimizu S. Synlett 2008; 1539
  • 6 Trillo P, Baeza A, Nájera C. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 7344 ; and references cited therein
  • 7 Srinu G, Srihari P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 2382
  • 8 Reddy PS, Ravi V, Sreedhar B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 4037 ; and references cited therein
  • 9 Hajipour AR, Rajaei A, Ruoho AE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 708
  • 10 Yadav JS, Bhunia DC, Krishna KV, Srihari P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 8306
  • 11 Kumar HM. S, Reddy BV. S, Anjaneyulu S, Yadav JS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 7385
  • 16 General Procedure for the Magnetic Nano Fe3O4 Catalyzed Direct Azidation of Allylic Alcohol 1a A mixture of alcohol 1a (0.5 mmol), trimethylsilyl azide (1.25 mmol), and magnetic nano Fe3O4 (particle size <50 nm, 15 mol%; the particles can be handled using a Teflon spatula) in DCE (3 mL) was stirred at 70 °C for 6 h. At this stage a magnet was externally applied to the reaction flask to attract the magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and the resulting clear solution was transferred to another flask using a pipette. The catalyst was washed using EtOAc (2 mL), and the residual Fe3O4 nanoparticles were heated in an oven at 100–110 °C overnight, and the catalyst was reused in subsequent cycles. The combined organic layers were evaporated under vacuum and purified by column chromatography to give the product 2. General Procedure for the One-Pot Magnetic Nano Fe3O4 Catalyzed Direct Azidation of Allylic Alcohols and Click Reaction The direct azidation of 1a (0.5 mmol) was carried out as above, the catalyst was removed using an external magnet, and the solvent was evaporated. Then to the residue THF (3 mL), H2O (3 mL), alkyne (1 mmol), CuSO4·5H2O (30 mol%), and sodium l-ascorbate (30 mol%) were added, and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 12 h. The reaction mixture was then extracted using EtOAc, the combined organic layers were evaporated, and the resulting reaction mixture was purified by column chromatography, eluting with EtOAc–hexanes (50:50), to afford the product 4a as a colorless liquid. Yield: 82% (238 mg). FT-IR (neat): ν = 3375, 2954, 1731, 1450, 1223, 1091 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.57 (s, 1 H), 7.41–7.28 (m, 10 H), 6.70 (dd, J 1 = 15.6 Hz, J 2 = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.52–6.47 (m, 2 H), 4.79 (s, 2 H), 3.36 (br s, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.8, 137.7, 135.5, 134.7, 129.2, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 127.5, 126.9, 125.5, 121.2, 66.5, 56.4. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C18H18N3O [M + H]+: 292.1450; found: 292.1100.

    • The nano Fe3O4 used in this work was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and the size of the particles was checked through HRTEM analysis/images (see the Supporting Information) before using the nano Fe3O4. For communications dealing with the preparation and characterization of nano Fe3O4, see:
    • 17a Sun J, Zhou S, Hou P, Yang Y, Weng J, Li X, Li M. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2007; 80: 333
    • 17b Yuanbi Z, Zumin Q, Jiaying H. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2008; 16: 451
    • 17c Wu S, Sun A, Zhai F, Wang J, Xu W, Zhang Q, Volinsky AA. Mater. Lett. 2011; 65: 1882
    • 17d Yang T, Shen C, Li Z, Zhang H, Xiao C, Chen S, Xu Z, Shi D, Li J, Gao H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005; 109: 23233