Varizenchirurgie durch den Dermatologen

Zusammenfassung

Anatomisch bedingt sind die Diagnostik und Therapie von Venenerkrankungen und deren Folgezuständen ein Teil der modernen Dermatologie. Bei ausreichender Erfahrung und geeignetem Setting weist die operative Sanierung der Varikosis durch den operativ tätigen Dermatologen hervorragende funktionelle wie kosmetische Ergebnisse bei geringer Rezidivrate auf. Ziel dieses Übersichtsartikels ist es, die praxisrelevante phlebologische Diagnostik zu skizzieren, operative und interventionelle Therapieverfahren ausführlich darzustellen und dem Leser Tipps und Tricks aus der täglichen Praxis eines überregionalen Venenschwerpunktzentrums zu vermitteln.

Abstract

Due to human anatomy, diagnosis and treatment of venous disease and its sequela form part of modern dermatology. Surgical treatment of venous disorders by an experienced dermatosurgeon using an adequate setting leads to excellent functional and cosmetic treatment results and minor recurrence rates. The primary aim of this review is to outline phlebologic diagnostics of practical relevance, to illustrate surgical and interventional treatment options and to provide the reader with tips and tricks from the daily practice of a transregional competence centre for venous disease.

• Literatur

• 1 Garrison FH. An introduction into the history of medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1929
• 2 Hach W, Hach-Wunderle V. Die Rezirkulationskreise der primären Varikose. Berlin: Springer; 1994
• 3 Babcock WW. A new operation for the extirpation of varicose veins of the leg. NY Med J 1907; 86: 153-156
• 4 Kluess HG, Noppeney T, Breu FX et al. Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Krampfadererkrankung. Phlebologie 2010; 39: 271-289
• 5 Nüllen H, Noppeney T. Diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins: Part 2: therapeutic procedures and results. Chirurg 2010; 81: 1125-1137
• 6 Franceschi C. Théorie et Pratique de la Cure Conservatrice et Hémodynamique de l’Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire. Édition de l’Armançon, Précy-sous-Thil. 1988. ISBN: ISBN: 2-906594-06-7
• 7 Mowatt-Larssen E, Shortell C. CHIVA. Semin Vasc Surg 2010; 23: 118-122
• 8 Mendoza E. CHIVA – Ein Handbuch. 1. Auflage Wunstorf: Arrien Verlag; 2002. ISBN-13: 978-3000095450
• 9 Geier B, Barbera L, Stücker M et al. Vein-saving therapy for greater saphenous vein insufficiency: experiences with the extraluminal valvuloplasty. Vasomed 2002; 14: 240-246
• 10 Sattler G, Sommer B, Hagedorn M. Die Bedeutung der Tumeszenz-Lokalanästesie in der ambulanten Varizenchirurgie. Phlebologie 1998; 27: 117-121
• 11 Bruning G, Rasmussen H, Wolf C et al. Articain versus Prilocain: Die Lösung der Toxizitätsfrage der Tumeszenlokalanästhesie. Akt Dermatol 2004; 30: 436-437
• 12 Beck-Schimmer B, Pasch T. Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2002; 37: 84-88
• 13 Sommer B, Sattler G. Tumeszenzlokalanästhesie. Weiterentwicklung der Lokalnästhesieverfahren für die operative Dermatologie. Hautarzt 1998; 49: 351-360
• 14 Earnshaw JJ, Heather BP. Neovascularisation as a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Scope Phlebol Lymphol 1999; 2: 20-23
• 15 Glass GM. Neovascularization in recurrence of varices of the great saphenous vein in the groin. Phlebography. Angiology 1988; 39: 577-582
• 16 Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D et al. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 442-445
• 17 Mumme A, Olbrich S, Babera L et al. Saphenofemoral groin-recurrence following stripping of the long saphenous vein: technical error or neovascularisation?. Phlebologie 2002; 31: 38-41
• 18 Nyamekye I, Shephard NA, Davies B et al. Clinicopathogical evidence that neovascularisation is a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15: 412-415
• 19 Turton EP, Scott DJ, Richards SP et al. Duplex-derived evidence of reflux after varicose vein surgery: neoreflux or neovascularisation?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 17: 230-233
• 20 Fischer R, Chandler JG, De Maeseneer MG et al. The unresolved problem of recurrent saphenofemoral reflux. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2002; 195: 80-94
• 21 Frings N, Nelle A, Tran VTP et al. Unavoidable recurrence and neoreflux after correctly performed ligation of the saphenofemoral junction: neovascularisation?. Phlebologie 2003; 32: 96-100
• 22 De Maeseneer MG, Vandenbroeck CP, Hendriks JM et al. Accuracy of duplex evaluation one year after varicose vein surgery to predict recurrence at the sapheno-femoral junction after five years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 308-312
• 23 Kluess HG, Gallenkämper G, Mulkens P et al. Modified ligation of the saphenofemoral junction – follow-up by colour duplex scan after 2 ½ years. Abstract. Vasomed 1997; 9 (Suppl. to issue 4)
• 24 Frings N, Nelle A, Tran P et al. Reduction of neoreflux after correctly performed ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. A randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28: 246-452
• 25 Bruning G, Schinagl H. Surgical management of recurrent insufficiency of the sapheno-femoral junction using modified technique of Junod. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2011; 9: 646-647
• 26 Huang TW, Chen SL, Bai CH et al. The optimal duration of compression therapy following varicose vein surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 45: 397-402
• 27 Allegra C, Antignani PL, Carlizza A. Recurrent varicose veins following surgical treatment: our experience with five years follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 751-756
• 28 Noppeney T, Noppeney J, Kurth I. Ergebnisse nach klassischer Varizenchirurgie. Zentralbl Chir 2002; 127: 748-751
• 29 Fischer R, Kluess HG, Frings N et al. Der aktuelle Stand der Magnakrossenrezidiv-Forschung. Phlebologie 2003; 32: 54-59
• 30 Faubel R, Schäfer I, Augustin M et al. Langzeitergebnisse und Analysen von Zusammenhängen 5 Jahre nach Varizenstripping. Phlebologie 2010; 39: 263-269
• 31 Flessenkämper I, Hartmann M, Stenger D et al. Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Phlebology 2013; 28: 16-23
• 32 Rasmussen L, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58: 421-426
• 33 Flessenkämper IH, Stenger D, Hartmann M et al. Two-Year Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Multicenter Trial to Compare Open Operative Therapy vs. Endoluminal Venous Laser Therapy with and without High Ligation for the Therapy of Varicose Greater Saphenous Veins. Zentralbl Chir 2014; May 8. [Epub ahead of print]
• 34 Rass K, Frings N, Glowacki P et al. Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study). Arch Dermatol 2011; 148: 49-58