Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391852
Efficacy and implications of a 48-h cutoff for video capsule endoscopy application in overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
Publication History
submitted 03 December 2014
accepted after revision 23 February 2015
Publication Date:
05 May 2015 (online)
Background and study aims: Early video capsule endoscopy (VCE) may provide a high diagnostic yield and improve clinical outcomes in patients with overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB); however, there is no practical recommendation for the ideal timing of VCE application in overt OGIB. Therefore, this study investigated the diagnostic yield and efficacy of VCE to assess overt OGIB with respect to the timing of application.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients who had undergone VCE for overt OGIB between April 2004 and February 2014 at a tertiary referral academic center. We included hemodynamically stable patients who underwent VCE for overt OGIB after negative bidirectional endoscopy. We analyzed the diagnostic yield of VCE, therapeutic intervention rate, and length of hospital stay.
Results: A total of 94 patients underwent VCE to assess overt OGIB. The diagnostic yields in the groups that underwent VCE < 48 h and > 48 h from the last overt OGIB were 66.7 % and 40.6 %, respectively (P = 0.019). Therapeutic intervention was performed in 26.7 % and 9.4 % of patients in the < 48-h and > 48-h groups, respectively (P = 0.028). The mean lengths of hospital stay in the < 48-h and > 48-h groups were 5 days (95 % confidence interval [CI], 4.8 – 7.7) and 7 days (95 %CI, 6.9 – 10.1), respectively (P = 0.039).
Conclusions: Performing VCE within 2 days from the last overt OGIB results in a higher diagnostic yield, higher therapeutic intervention rate, and shorter hospital stay. Therefore, VCE application with a 48-h cutoff could improve the outcome of patients with overt OGIB.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
-
References
- 1 Zuckerman GR, Prakash C, Askin MP et al. AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 201-221
- 2 Leighton JA, Goldstein J, Hirota W et al. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 650-655
- 3 Yamada A, Watabe H, Kobayashi Y et al. Timing of capsule endoscopy influences the diagnosis and outcome in obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Hepatogastroenterology 2012; 59: 676-679
- 4 Bresci G, Parisi G, Bertoni M et al. The role of video capsule endoscopy for evaluating obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: usefulness of early use. J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 256-259
- 5 Laine L, Sahota A, Shah A. Does capsule endoscopy improve outcomes in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding? Randomized trial versus dedicated small bowel radiography. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 1673-1680
- 6 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E et al. Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 643-653
- 7 Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C et al. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 280-286
- 8 Rondonotti E, Villa F, Mulder CJ et al. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in 2007: indications, risks and limitations. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 6140-6149
- 9 Pennazio M, Eisen G, Goldfarb N et al. ICCE consensus for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1046-1050
- 10 Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2407-2418
- 11 Leighton JA, Triester SL, Sharma VK. Capsule endoscopy: a meta-analysis for use with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 229-250
- 12 Hadithi M, Heine GD, Jacobs MA et al. A prospective study comparing video capsule endoscopy with double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 52-57
- 13 Almeida N, Figueiredo P, Lopes S et al. Urgent capsule endoscopy is useful in severe obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Digest Endosc 2009; 21: 87-92
- 14 Singh A, Marshall C, Chaudhuri B et al. Timing of video capsule endoscopy relative to overt obscure GI bleeding: implications from a retrospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 761-766
- 15 Lecleire S, Iwanicki-Caron I et al. Yield and impact of emergency capsule enteroscopy in severe obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 337-342
- 16 Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 2000; 405: 417
- 17 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Fisher L, Lee KrinskyM et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 471-479
- 18 Rondonotti E, Marmo R, Petracchini M et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) diagnostic algorithm for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: eight burning questions from everyday clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 179-185
- 19 Hindrycks P, Botelberge T, De Vos M et al. Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy on further strategy and long-term clinical outcome in patients with obscure bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 98-104
- 20 Richter JM, Christensen MR, Colditz GA et al. Angiodysplasia: natural history and efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34: 1542-1546
- 21 Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Vahedi K et al. Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy compared to push enteroscopy: 1-year follow-up study. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 318-323