PDF herunterladen
Semin Plast Surg 2015; 29(01): 073-080
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1544172
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity Following Nerve and Tendon Reconstruction: When and How

Christine B. Novak
1   Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2   Toronto Rehab and Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Rebecca L. von der Heyde
3   Department of Occupational Therapy, Concordia University Wisconsin, Mequon, Wisconsin
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
04. Februar 2015 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Following upper extremity nerve and tendon reconstruction, rehabilitation is necessary to achieve optimal function and outcome. In this review, the authors present current evidence and literature regarding the strategies and techniques of rehabilitation following peripheral nerve and tendon reconstruction.

Keywords

tendon - nerve - rehabilitation - upper extremity - hand
 

  • References

  • 1 Novak CB, von der Heyde RL. Hand therapy. In: Neligan PC, Chang J, , eds. Plastic Surgery. London: Elsevier Saunders; 2013: 855-869
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Clare TD, de Haviland Mee S, Belcher HJCR. Rehabilitation of digital nerve repair: is splinting necessary?. J Hand Surg [Br] 2004; 29 (6) 552-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Katz J. Patient reported outcome following peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (2) 281-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Novak CB, Katz J. Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury. Physiother Can 2010; 62 (3) 190-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gordon T, Sulaiman OAR, Ladak A. Chapter 24: Electrical stimulation for improving nerve regeneration: where do we stand?. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009; 87: 433-444
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fu SY, Gordon T. Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation. J Neurosci 1995; 15 (5 Pt 2): 3886-3895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Williams HB. The value of continuous electrical muscle stimulation using a completely implantable system in the preservation of muscle function following motor nerve injury and repair: an experimental study. Microsurgery 1996; 17 (11) 589-596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Eberstein A, Eberstein S. Electrical stimulation of denervated muscle: is it worthwhile?. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28 (12) 1463-1469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Michlovitz SL. Is there a role for ultrasound and electrical stimulation following injury to tendon and nerve?. J Hand Ther 2005; 18 (2) 292-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gordon T, Brushart TM, Amirjani N, Chan KM. The potential of electrical stimulation to promote functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury—comparisons between rats and humans. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2007; 100: 3-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dellon AL, Curtis RM, Edgerton MT. Reeducation of sensation in the hand after nerve injury and repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53 (3) 297-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dellon AL. Somatosensory Testing and Rehabilitation. Baltimore, MD: Institute for Peripheral Nerve; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Imai H, Tajima T, Natsumi Y. Successful reeducation of functional sensibility after median nerve repair at the wrist. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (1) 60-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Novak CB, Kelly L, Mackinnon SE. Sensory recovery after median nerve grafting. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (1) 59-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Spicher CJ, Mathis F, Degrange B, Freund P, Rouiller EM. Static mechanical allodynia (SMA) is a paradoxical painful hypo-aesthesia: observations derived from neuropathic pain patients treated with somatosensory rehabilitation. Somatosens Mot Res 2008; 25 (1) 77-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rosen B, Lundborg G. Sensory re-education following nerve repair. In: Slutsky DJ, , ed. Upper Extremity Nerve Repair—Tips and Techniques: A Master Skills Publication. Rosemont, IL: American Society for Surgery of the Hand; 2008: 159-178
    Google Scholar
  • 17 McCabe C. Mirror visual feedback therapy. A practical approach. J Hand Ther 2011; 24 (2) 170-178 , quiz 179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Moucha R, Kilgard MP. Cortical plasticity and rehabilitation. Prog Brain Res 2006; 157: 111-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rosén B, Lundborg G. Training with a mirror in rehabilitation of the hand. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2005; 39 (2) 104-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Oud T, Beelen A, Eijffinger E, Nollet F. Sensory re-education after nerve injury of the upper limb: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21 (6) 483-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150 (3699) 971-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain 2009; 132 (Pt 7) 1693-1710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Moseley GL, Wiech K. The effect of tactile discrimination training is enhanced when patients watch the reflected image of their unaffected limb during training. Pain 2009; 144 (3) 314-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Anastakis DJ, Chen R, Davis KD, Mikulis D. Cortical plasticity following upper extremity injury and reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2005; 32 (4) 617-634 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Malessy MJ, Bakker D, Dekker AJ, Van Duk JG, Thomeer RT. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and control over the biceps muscle after intercostal-musculocutaneous nerve transfer. J Neurosurg 2003; 98 (2) 261-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Duff SV. Impact of peripheral nerve injury on sensorimotor control. J Hand Ther 2005; 18 (2) 277-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Chen R, Anastakis DJ, Haywood CT, Mikulis DJ, Manktelow RT. Plasticity of the human motor system following muscle reconstruction: a magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114 (12) 2434-2446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J Hand Ther 1993; 6 (2) 89-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Taylor KS, Anastakis DJ, Davis KD. Cutting your nerve changes your brain. Brain 2009; 132 (Pt 11) 3122-3133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Novak CB. Rehabilitation following motor nerve transfers. Hand Clin 2008; 24 (4) 417-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Novak CB. Rehabilitation following nerve transfer. In: Slutsky DJ, , ed. Upper Extremity Nerve Repair - Tips and Techniques: A Master Skills Publication. Rosemont, IL: American Society for Surgery of the Hand; 2008: 261-266
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Mackinnon SE, Novak CB, Myckatyn TM, Tung TH. Results of reinnervation of the biceps and brachialis muscles with a double fascicular transfer for elbow flexion. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (5) 978-985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Tung TH, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Nerve transfers to the biceps and brachialis branches to improve elbow flexion strength after brachial plexus injuries. J Neurosurg 2003; 98 (2) 313-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Merrell GA, Barrie KA, Katz DL, Wolfe SW. Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (2) 303-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Oberlin C, Béal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJ. Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (2) 232-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Distal anterior interosseous nerve transfer to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve for reconstruction of high ulnar nerve injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18 (6) 459-464
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: Testing and Function. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Sahrmann SA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Starr HM, Snoddy M, Hammond KE, Seiler III JG. Flexor tendon repair rehabilitation protocols: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (9) 1712-7.e1 , 14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Groth GN. Pyramid of progressive force exercises to the injured flexor tendon. J Hand Ther 2004; 17 (1) 31-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Amadio PC. Friction of the gliding surface. Implications for tendon surgery and rehabilitation. J Hand Ther 2005; 18 (2) 112-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Tanaka T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Zobitz ME, An KN. Gliding resistance versus work of flexion—two methods to assess flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res 2003; 21 (5) 813-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zhao C, Amadio PC, Paillard P , et al. Digital resistance and tendon strength during the first week after flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair in a canine model in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (2) 320-327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Zhao C, Amadio PC, Tanaka T , et al. Short-term assessment of optimal timing for postoperative rehabilitation after flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair in a canine model. J Hand Ther 2005; 18 (3) 322-329 , quiz 329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Cao Y, Tang JB. Investigation of resistance of digital subcutaneous edema to gliding of the flexor tendon: an in vitro study. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (6) 1248-1254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Cao Y, Chen CH, Wu YF, Xu XF, Xie RG, Tang JB. Digital oedema, adhesion formation and resistance to digital motion after primary flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33 (6) 745-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Cao Y, Tang JB. Resistance to motion of flexor tendons and digital edema: an in vivo study in a chicken model. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (10) 1645-1651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Buonocore S, Sawh-Martinez R, Emerson JW, Mohan P, Dymarczyk M, Thomson JG. The effects of edema and self-adherent wrap on the work of flexion in a cadaveric hand. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (7) 1349-1355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Manske PR. History of flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin 2005; 21 (2) 123-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Cohen MJ. Primary repair of zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations. Paper presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand 1975;91–104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Duran RE, Houser RG. Controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repair in zones two and three. In: Hunter J, Schneider L, , eds. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand. St. Louis. MO: CV Mosby; 1975: 105-114
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Groth GN. Current practice patterns of flexor tendon rehabilitation. J Hand Ther 2005; 18 (2) 169-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Cooney WP, Lin GT, An KN. Improved tendon excursion following flexor tendon repair. J Hand Ther 1989; 2: 102-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Evans RB, Thompson DE. The application of force to the healing tendon. J Hand Ther 1993; 6 (4) 266-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Lieber RL, Amiel D, Kaufman KR, Whitney J, Gelberman RH. Relationship between joint motion and flexor tendon force in the canine forelimb. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (6) 957-962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Lieber RL, Silva MJ, Amiel D, Gelberman RH. Wrist and digital joint motion produce unique flexor tendon force and excursion in the canine forelimb. J Biomech 1999; 32 (2) 175-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Savage R. The influence of wrist position on the minimum force required for active movement of the interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg [Br] 1988; 13 (3) 262-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Zhao C, Amadio PC, Zobitz ME, Momose T, Couvreur P, An KN. Effect of synergistic motion on flexor digitorum profundus tendon excursion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (396) 223-230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Strickland JW, Cannon NM. Flexor tendon repair - Indiana method. Indiana Hand Center Newsletter 1993; 1: 1-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Coats II RW, Echevarría-Oré JC, Mass DP. Acute flexor tendon repairs in zone II. Hand Clin 2005; 21 (2) 173-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Lalonde D. How the wide awake approach is changing hand surgery and hand therapy: inaugural AAHS sponsored lecture at the ASHT meeting, San Diego, 2012. J Hand Ther 2013; 26 (2) 175-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Sandow MJ, McMahon M. Active mobilisation following single cross grasp four-strand flexor tenorrhaphy (Adelaide repair). J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (6) 467-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Clancy SP, Mass DP. Current flexor and extensor tendon motion regimens: a summary. Hand Clin 2013; 29 (2) 295-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Peck FH, Roe AE, Ng CY, Duf C, McGrouther DA, Lees VC. The Manchester short splint: a change to splinting practice in the rehabilitation of zone II flexor tendon repairs. Hand Ther 2014; 19: 47-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Boyer MI, Gelberman RH, Burns ME, Dinopoulos H, Hofem R, Silva MJ. Intrasynovial flexor tendon repair. An experimental study comparing low and high levels of in vivo force during rehabilitation in canines. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A (6) 891-899
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Goldfarb CA, Harwood F, Silva MJ, Gelberman RH, Amiel D, Boyer MI. The effect of variations in applied rehabilitation force on collagen concentration and maturation at the intrasynovial flexor tendon repair site. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (5) 841-846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Silva MJ, Brodt MD, Boyer MI , et al. Effects of increased in vivo excursion on digital range of motion and tendon strength following flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res 1999; 17 (5) 777-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Greenwald D, Shumway S, Allen C, Mass D. Dynamic analysis of profundus tendon function. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (4) 626-635
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Schuind F, Garcia-Elias M, Cooney III WP, An KN. Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (2) 291-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Urbaniak JR, Cahill JD, Mortenson RA. Tendon suturing methods: Analysis of tensile strengths. In: Hunter J, Schneider L, , eds. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1975: 70-80
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Wehbé MA, Hunter JM. Flexor tendon gliding in the hand. Part II. Differential gliding. J Hand Surg Am 1985; 10 (4) 575-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Small JO, Brennen MD, Colville J. Early active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989; 14 (4) 383-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Tang JB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007; 32 (2) 118-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Farzad M, Layeghi F, Asgari A, Ring DC, Karimlou M, Hosseini SA. A prospective randomized controlled trial of controlled passive mobilization vs. Place and active hold exercises after zone 2 flexor tendon repair. Hand Surg 2014; 19 (1) 53-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Frueh FS, Kunz VS, Gravestock IJ , et al. Primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2: early passive mobilization versus controlled active motion. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (7) 1344-1350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Trumble TE, Vedder NB, Seiler III JG, Hanel DP, Diao E, Pettrone S. Zone-II flexor tendon repair: a randomized prospective trial of active place-and-hold therapy compared with passive motion therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (6) 1381-1389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Yen CH, Chan WL, Wong JWC, Mak KH. Clinical results of early active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. Hand Surg 2008; 13 (1) 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Strickland JW, Glogovac SV. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: A comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5 (6) 537-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar