Download PDF
Z Orthop Unfall 2015; 153(2): 187-191
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545682
Aus den Sektionen – AE Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoprothetik
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Tripolare Pfannen

Tripolar Cups
B. Fink
Klinik für Endoprothetik, Allgemeine und Rheumaorthopädie, Orthopädische Klinik Markgröninigen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 April 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Tripolare Pfannen können in gekoppelte Pfannen und ungekoppelte Dual-Mobility-Cups unterschieden werden. Letztgenannte zeigen bessere Überlebens- und Revisionsraten. Das Hauptproblem stellt der Polyäthylenabrieb dar, weswegen heute moderne Polyäthylene verwendet werden. Die Indikationen für Dual-Mobility-Cups stellen rezidivierende Luxationen und Situationen dar, in denen ein höheres Luxationsrisiko besteht.

Abstract

Tripolar cups can be separated into constrained and unconstrained dual-mobility cups. The latter show better survival and revision rates. The main problem is the polyethylene wear. Therefore modern types of polyethylene are used in these cups. The indications for dual-mobility cups are recurrent dislocation and situations where the risk of dislocation is increased.

Schlüsselwörter

Pfannen - tripolar - Duo Mobility - Revision - Luxation

Key words

cups - tripolar - duo mobility - revision - dislocation
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD et al. The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 9-14
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bozic KJ, Kurzt S, Lau E et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 128-133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Clohisy JC, Harris WH. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoated femoral component with cement: an average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 247-255
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Crawford SA, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral modular cemented stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 684-686
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Taunton jr. OD, Culpepper 2nd WJ, Engh sr. CA. Treatment of complications in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 344: 150-161
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Guyen O, Chen QS, Bejui-Hugues J et al. Unconstrained tripolar hip implants: effect on hip stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 455: 202-208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Stroh A, Naziri Q, Johnson AJ et al. Dual-mobility bearings: a review of the literature. Expert Rev Med Devices 2012; 9: 23-31
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B. Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 3048-3053
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G et al. [Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008; 94: 731-739
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Philippot R, Adam P, Farizon F et al. [Survival of cementless dual mobility sockets: ten-year follow-up]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2006; 92: 326-331
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Mertl P, Combes A, Leiber-Wackenheim R et al. Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years. HSS J 2012; 8: 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 511-518
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Grazioli A, Ek ET, Rüdiger HA. Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 2411-2418
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Loving L, Lee RK, Herrera L et al. Wear performance evaluation of a contemporary dual mobility hip bearing using multiple hip simulator testing conditions. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 1041-1046
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Heffernan C, Benerjee S, Nevelos J et al. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 1535-1544
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Cooke CC, Hozack W, Lavernia C et al. Early failure mechanisms of constrained tripolar acetabular sockets used in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 827-833
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Sanders RJ, Swierstra BA, Goosen JH. The use of a dual-mobility concept in total hip arthroplasty patients with spastic disorders: no dislocations in a series of ten cases at midterm follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133: 1011-1016
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Buly RL, Huo M, Root L et al. Total hip arthroplasty in cerebral palsy. Long-term follow-up results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 296: 148-153
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Root L. Surgical treatment for hip pain in adult cerebral palsy patient. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51 (Suppl. 04) S84-S91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Schorle CM, Fuchs G, Manolikakis G. Total hip arthroplasty in cerebral palsy. Orthopade 2006; 35: 823-833
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Schroeder K, Hauck C, Wiedenhofer B et al. Long-term results of hip arthroplasty in ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 335-339
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Raphael BS, Dines JS, Akerman M et al. Long-term followup of total hip arthroplasty in patients with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 1845-1854
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A et al. Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation. 228 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 566-571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B et al. The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 2009; 33: 927-932
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ et al. Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 1998; 22: 219-224
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Philippot R, Boyer B, Faizon F. Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 965-970
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Goetz DD, Capello WM, Callaghan JJ et al. Salvage of total hip instability with a constrained acetabular component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 355: 171-181
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Goetz DD, Capello WN, Callaghan JJ et al. Salvage of a recurrently dislocating total hip prosthesis with use of a constrained acetabular component. A retrospective analysis of fifty-six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 502-509
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Aubriot H, Lesimple P, Leclercq S. Etude du cotyle non scelle de Bousquet dans cent protheses totales de hanche hybrides (composant femoral type Charnley scelle). Recul moyen 5 ans. Acta Orthop Belg 1993; 59 (Suppl. 01) S267-S271
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Shapiro TS, Weiland DE, Markel DC et al. The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 250-258
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Bremner BR, Goetz DD, Callaghan JJ et al. Use of constrained acetabular components for hip instability: an average 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (Suppl. 01) S131-S137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Shrader MW, Parvizi J, Lewallen DG. The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 2179-2183
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Callaghan JJ, Parvizi J, Novak CC et al. A constrained liner cemented into a secure cementless acetabular shell. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 2206-2211
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Callaghan JJ, OʼRourke MR, Goetz DD et al. Use of a constrained tripolar acetabular liner to treat intraoperative instability and postoperative dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a review of our experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 429: 117-123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Goetz DD, Bremner BR, Callaghan JJ et al. Salvage of a recurrently dislocating total hip prosthesis with use of a constrained acetabular component. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 2419-2423
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 McCarthy JC, Lee JA. Constrained acetabular components in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441: 210-215
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Zywiel MG, Mustafa LH, Bonutti PM et al. Are abductor muscle quality and previous revision surgery predictors of constrained liner failure in hip arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 797-802
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Guyen O, Piberot V, Vaz G et al. Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 849-858
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Tarasevicus S, Busevicius M, Robertsson O et al. Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 175
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Bouchet R, Mercier N, Saragaglia D. Posterior approach and silocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual moblilty cup with conventional 28-mm head/polyethylene prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97: 2-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Prudhon JL. Dual-mobility cup and cemented femoral component: 6 year follow-up results. Hip Int 2011; 21: 713-717
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M et al. Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98: 296-300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J et al. Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 3891-3900
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Philippot R, Meucci JF, Boyer B et al. Modern dual-mobility cup implanted with an uncemented stem: about 100 cases with 12-year follow-up. Surg Technol Int 2013; 23: 208-212
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R. Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 2345-2350
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Epinette JA, Béracassat R, Tracol P et al. Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients?. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1323-1328
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Bensen AS, Jakobsen T, Krarup N. Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop 2014; 38: 1241-1245
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A et al. A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 2014; 38: 1125-1129
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F et al. Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 389-395
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Levine BR, Della Valle CJ, Deirmengian CA et al. The use of a tripolar articulation in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 1182-1188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G et al. Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 465-472
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Götze C, Glosemeyer D, Ahrens J et al. Die bipolare Pfanne Avantage in der Hüftrevisionschirurgie. Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 148: 420-425
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97: 807-813
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F et al. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 3542-3548
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Saragaglia D, Ruattik S, Refaie R. Relevance of a press-fit mobility cup to deal with recurrent dislocation of conventional total hip arthroplasty: a 29-case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013; 23: 431-436
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Vasukutty NL, Middleton RG, Matthews EC et al. The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement: the United Kingdom experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 603-608
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M et al. Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 yearsʼ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97: 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Massin P, Besnier L. Acetabular revision using a press-fit dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 9-13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Leclercq S, Benoit JY, De Rosa JP et al. [Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket: five years follow-up]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008; 94: 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Grigoris P, Grecula MJ, Amstutz HC. Tripolar hip replacement for recurrent prosthetic dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 304: 148-155
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar